Juncos, Luis A.

We tested the hypothesis that angiotensin II (Ang II)–induced stimulations of endothelin (ET) and isoprostanes are implicated in the slow pressor responses to Ang II. We infused either vehicle (group 1) or Ang II (groups 2 to 4) intravenously at 5 ng/kg per minute via osmotic pumps for 15 days into Sprague-Dawley rats. Groups 3 and 4 received 30 mg/kg per day of either losartan (Ang II type 1 receptor blocker) or bosentan (ETAand ETBreceptor blocker) in their drinking water. We measured systolic blood pressure (SBP) every 3 days during the infusion. Plasma levels of Ang II, ET, isoprostanes, and urinary nitrites were determined at 15 days. Vehicle infusion did not change SBP (from 138±13 to 136±2 mm Hg at day 15). Circulating Ang II, ET, and isoprostane levels were 35±9, 39±3, and 111±10 pg/mL, respectively, whereas urinary nitrites were 2.3±0.4 μg/d. Ang II increased SBP (from 133±10 to 158±8 mm Hg), plasma Ang II (179±77 pg/mL), and isoprostanes (156±19 pg/mL) without altering ET levels (38±5 pg/mL) or urinary nitrites (1.8±0.5 μg/d). Losartan prevented Ang II–induced increases in SBP and isoprostanes (SBP went from 137±5 to 120±4 mm Hg; isoprostanes were 115±15 pg/mL) while increasing urinary nitrite levels (5.2±1.1 μg/d). Losartan did not alter Ang II (141±57 pg/mL) or ET (40±4 pg/mL) levels. Bosentan also blocked Ang II–induced hypertension (from 135±4 to 139±3 mm Hg) but did not decrease isoprostanes (146±14 pg/mL). Ang II (63±11 pg/mL), ET levels (46±2 pg/mL), and urinary nitrites (2.8±0.4 μg/d) were not altered. In conclusion, our results suggest that low-dose Ang II increases isoprostanes via its Ang II type 1 receptor and causes an ET-dependent hypertension, without altering circulating ET levels.

ANG II causes renal injury through hemodynamic and other effects, and pressor doses of ANG II induce heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) as a protective response. The present studies examined the hemodynamic effects of more clinically relevant, lower doses of ANG II and the role of HO activity in influencing these effects. Under euvolemic conditions, ANG II increased arterial pressure and renal vascular resistance. ANG II did not induce oxidative stress, inflammation/injury-related gene expression, or proteinuria and did not alter extrarenal vascular reactivity. At these doses, ANG II failed to increase HO-1 or HO-2 mRNA expression or HO activity. Inhibiting HO activity in ANG II-treated rats by tin mesoporphyrin further increased renal vascular resistances, decreased renal blood flow, and blunted the rise in arterial pressure without inducing oxidative stress or altering expression of selected vasoactive/injury/inflammation-related genes; tin mesoporphyrin did not alter vasorelaxation of mesenteric resistor vessels. We conclude that in this model renal vasoconstriction occurs without the recognized adverse effects of ANG II on glomerular filtration rate, renal blood flow, oxidative stress, vascular reactivity, proteinuria, and injury-related gene expression; renal HO activity is essential in preserving perfusion of the ANG II-exposed kidney. These findings represent an uncommon example wherein function of a stressed organ (by ANG II), but not that of the unstressed organ, requires intact renal HO activity, even when the imposed stress neither induces HO-1 nor HO activity. These findings may be germane to conditions attended by heightened ANG II levels, ineffective renal perfusion, and susceptibility to acute kidney injury.

There is substantial evidence suggesting that angiotensin II plays an important role in elevating blood pressure of spontaneously hypertensive rats, despite normal plasma renin activity, and that converting enzyme inhibitors (captopril) can effectively normalize blood pressure in the spontaneously hypertensive rats. One mechanism by which angiotensin II induces hypertension is via oxidative stress and endothelin, as seen in subpressor angiotensin II–induced hypertension. In fact, it has been shown that antioxidants lower mean arterial pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats. However, the relationship between angiotensin II, oxidative stress, and endothelin in the spontaneously hypertensive rats is still relatively undefined. This study examines the relationship between mean arterial pressure, plasma renin activity, angiotensin II, oxidative stress, and endothelin in spontaneously hypertensive rats compared with normotensive Wistar Kyoto rats, and the effects of captopril on this association. Untreated spontaneously hypertensive rats had increased plasma angiotensin II levels despite normal plasma renin activity, oxidative stress, and endothelin. Captopril treatment in spontaneously hypertensive rats lowered mean arterial pressure, angiotensin II, oxidative stress, and endothelin, and increased plasma renin activity. In contrast, captopril increased plasma renin activity (suggesting effective captopril treatment) but did not significantly alter mean arterial pressure, angiotensin II, oxidative stress, or endothelin of Wistar Kyoto rats. These results suggest that in spontaneously hypertensive rats, angiotensin II is a primary instigator of hypertension, and that captopril selectively lowers angiotensin II, oxidant stress, and endothelin, which in turn may contribute to the blood pressure-lowering efficacy of captopril in spontaneously hypertensive rats.

We examined whether interactions between angiotensin II (Ang II), endothelin (ET), nitric oxide (NO), and prostaglandins (PGs) differentially regulate perfusion to distinct vascular beds. For this, we blocked either angiotensin AT 1 or ET receptors or both and then sequentially inhibited NO and PG synthesis in anesthetized dogs. Blocking Ang II or ET had similar effects on systemic hemodynamics: Mean arterial pressure fell slightly without altering cardiac output. Blocking both caused a synergistic fall in mean arterial pressure and increased cardiac output. Pulmonary vascular resistance was not altered by blocking Ang II, ET, or both but progressively increased during NO and PG blockade in group 2 (which had unblocked ET receptors), suggesting that endogenous ET exerts pulmonary vasoconstriction that is tempered by NO and PGs. In the kidney, blocking Ang II increased regional blood flow (RBF), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and fractional excretion of sodium (FENa). In contrast, blocking ET did not alter RBF, and it decreased GFR and FENa. Combined Ang II and ET blockade markedly increased RBF without altering GFR, and FENa was maintained at the levels as when only ET was blocked. Sequentially inhibiting NO and PGs decreased RBF when Ang II or ET were blocked but had little effect when both were blocked. Finally, Ang II or ET blockade did not alter iliac blood flow. Inhibiting NO and PGs decreased iliac blood flow when Ang II or ET but not both were blocked. These results suggest that regional differences in the interactions between endogenous Ang II, ET, NO, and PGs are important determinants in systemic, pulmonary, and regional hemodynamics.

Subpressor doses of angiotensin II (SP-Ang II) cause a slow increase in blood pressure in rats as assessed by tail cuff plethysmography (TCP), reflecting either sustained hypertension or an exaggerated pressor response to diverse stimuli. We examined whether subpressor doses of Ang II enhance blood pressure responses to simple stress (handling of trained rats for TCP). We implanted telemetry in Sprague-Dawley rats. After 10 days of recovery and TCP training, we implanted osmotic minipumps with either SP-Ang II (50 ng/kg per minute) or vehicle, and then measured systolic blood pressure continuously in unrestrained rats for 13 days. We also recorded telemetry readings while obtaining TCP measurements every 2 days. SP-Ang II increased blood pressure from 134±19 to 159±22 mm Hg by TCP, which matched the simultaneous telemetry readings of 131±20 to 154±25 mm Hg. In contrast, SP-Ang II did not change the blood pressure in the unrestrained rats (measured with continuous telemetry: 124±2 versus 127±1 mm Hg). The blood pressure in the control rats did not change in the unrestrained state (125±3 versus 128±5 mm Hg on days 0 and 12, respectively), and only slightly increased during TCP (11±5 and 6±4 mm Hg by TCP and simultaneous telemetry, respectively; P =NS). In summary, SP-Ang II, although unable to provoke sustained hypertension, nonetheless magnifies the pressor response to otherwise trivial stimuli. We speculate that even modestly elevated Ang II levels may contribute to hypertensive complications because such levels promote the punctuation of an apparent normotensive state by episodic hypertension occasioned by seemingly innocuous stimuli.