Manriquez, Melissa C.

Abstract — — Chronically infusing a subpressor dose of angiotensin (Ang) II increases blood pressure via poorly defined mechanisms. We found that this hypertensive response is accompanied by increased oxidant stress and is prevented by blocking endothelin (ET) receptors. Thus, we now tested whether blocking oxidant stress decreases both blood pressure and ET levels. We infused Sprague-Dawley rats (via osmotic pumps) with either vehicle (group 1) or Ang II (5 ng · kg −1 · min −1 ; groups 2 to 4) for 15 days. Groups 3 and 4 also received either tempol in the drinking water (1 mmol/L) or vitamin E (5000 IU/kg diet), respectively, for 15 days. We measured systolic blood pressure (SBP) and urinary nitrite excretion every 3 days, and on day 15 we measured systemic and renal venous plasma levels of ET, isoprostanes, and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS). SBP in Group 1 did not change throughout the study, whereas Ang II increased SBP (from 132±5 to 151±7 mm Hg). In addition, Ang II increased the systemic and renal venous levels of isoprostanes, TBARS, and ET and caused a transient decrease in urinary nitrites (that returned to control levels by day 9). Both tempol and vitamin E prevented Ang II-induced hypertension and either prevented or tended to blunt the increase in systemic and renal isoprostanes, TBARS, and ET. Finally, both antioxidants abolished the transient decrease in urinary nitrites. These results together with our previous study suggest that subpressor-dose Ang II increases oxidant stress (and isoprostanes). This in turn increases ET levels, which participate in the hypertensive response to Ang II.

We tested the hypothesis that angiotensin II (Ang II)–induced stimulations of endothelin (ET) and isoprostanes are implicated in the slow pressor responses to Ang II. We infused either vehicle (group 1) or Ang II (groups 2 to 4) intravenously at 5 ng/kg per minute via osmotic pumps for 15 days into Sprague-Dawley rats. Groups 3 and 4 received 30 mg/kg per day of either losartan (Ang II type 1 receptor blocker) or bosentan (ETAand ETBreceptor blocker) in their drinking water. We measured systolic blood pressure (SBP) every 3 days during the infusion. Plasma levels of Ang II, ET, isoprostanes, and urinary nitrites were determined at 15 days. Vehicle infusion did not change SBP (from 138±13 to 136±2 mm Hg at day 15). Circulating Ang II, ET, and isoprostane levels were 35±9, 39±3, and 111±10 pg/mL, respectively, whereas urinary nitrites were 2.3±0.4 μg/d. Ang II increased SBP (from 133±10 to 158±8 mm Hg), plasma Ang II (179±77 pg/mL), and isoprostanes (156±19 pg/mL) without altering ET levels (38±5 pg/mL) or urinary nitrites (1.8±0.5 μg/d). Losartan prevented Ang II–induced increases in SBP and isoprostanes (SBP went from 137±5 to 120±4 mm Hg; isoprostanes were 115±15 pg/mL) while increasing urinary nitrite levels (5.2±1.1 μg/d). Losartan did not alter Ang II (141±57 pg/mL) or ET (40±4 pg/mL) levels. Bosentan also blocked Ang II–induced hypertension (from 135±4 to 139±3 mm Hg) but did not decrease isoprostanes (146±14 pg/mL). Ang II (63±11 pg/mL), ET levels (46±2 pg/mL), and urinary nitrites (2.8±0.4 μg/d) were not altered. In conclusion, our results suggest that low-dose Ang II increases isoprostanes via its Ang II type 1 receptor and causes an ET-dependent hypertension, without altering circulating ET levels.

There is substantial evidence suggesting that angiotensin II plays an important role in elevating blood pressure of spontaneously hypertensive rats, despite normal plasma renin activity, and that converting enzyme inhibitors (captopril) can effectively normalize blood pressure in the spontaneously hypertensive rats. One mechanism by which angiotensin II induces hypertension is via oxidative stress and endothelin, as seen in subpressor angiotensin II–induced hypertension. In fact, it has been shown that antioxidants lower mean arterial pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats. However, the relationship between angiotensin II, oxidative stress, and endothelin in the spontaneously hypertensive rats is still relatively undefined. This study examines the relationship between mean arterial pressure, plasma renin activity, angiotensin II, oxidative stress, and endothelin in spontaneously hypertensive rats compared with normotensive Wistar Kyoto rats, and the effects of captopril on this association. Untreated spontaneously hypertensive rats had increased plasma angiotensin II levels despite normal plasma renin activity, oxidative stress, and endothelin. Captopril treatment in spontaneously hypertensive rats lowered mean arterial pressure, angiotensin II, oxidative stress, and endothelin, and increased plasma renin activity. In contrast, captopril increased plasma renin activity (suggesting effective captopril treatment) but did not significantly alter mean arterial pressure, angiotensin II, oxidative stress, or endothelin of Wistar Kyoto rats. These results suggest that in spontaneously hypertensive rats, angiotensin II is a primary instigator of hypertension, and that captopril selectively lowers angiotensin II, oxidant stress, and endothelin, which in turn may contribute to the blood pressure-lowering efficacy of captopril in spontaneously hypertensive rats.

Subpressor doses of angiotensin II (SP-Ang II) cause a slow increase in blood pressure in rats as assessed by tail cuff plethysmography (TCP), reflecting either sustained hypertension or an exaggerated pressor response to diverse stimuli. We examined whether subpressor doses of Ang II enhance blood pressure responses to simple stress (handling of trained rats for TCP). We implanted telemetry in Sprague-Dawley rats. After 10 days of recovery and TCP training, we implanted osmotic minipumps with either SP-Ang II (50 ng/kg per minute) or vehicle, and then measured systolic blood pressure continuously in unrestrained rats for 13 days. We also recorded telemetry readings while obtaining TCP measurements every 2 days. SP-Ang II increased blood pressure from 134±19 to 159±22 mm Hg by TCP, which matched the simultaneous telemetry readings of 131±20 to 154±25 mm Hg. In contrast, SP-Ang II did not change the blood pressure in the unrestrained rats (measured with continuous telemetry: 124±2 versus 127±1 mm Hg). The blood pressure in the control rats did not change in the unrestrained state (125±3 versus 128±5 mm Hg on days 0 and 12, respectively), and only slightly increased during TCP (11±5 and 6±4 mm Hg by TCP and simultaneous telemetry, respectively; P =NS). In summary, SP-Ang II, although unable to provoke sustained hypertension, nonetheless magnifies the pressor response to otherwise trivial stimuli. We speculate that even modestly elevated Ang II levels may contribute to hypertensive complications because such levels promote the punctuation of an apparent normotensive state by episodic hypertension occasioned by seemingly innocuous stimuli.