Schweizer, Marin Leigh

Abstract Objective: Suppressive antibiotic therapy (SAT) is used to prevent recurrent prosthetic joint infections (PJI) among patients who undergo debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR). We aimed to assess SAT outcomes among younger, immunocompetent patients. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Patients: Immunocompetent patients <65 years of age who received DAIR for PJI of the hip, knee, or shoulder. Setting: Veterans Affairs hospitals. Methods: SAT was divided into short-term (oral antibiotics given for <3 months after guideline concordant therapy) and long-term SAT (>3 months to 5 years of oral antibiotics). The primary outcome was treatment failure (TF) and mortality combined. SAT was a time-dependent covariate in Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Of the 938 patients, 15% received short-term SAT, 20% received long-term SAT, and 65% did not receive SAT. Short- and long-term SAT were significantly associated with decreased hazards of TF or mortality (short-term SAT adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.27; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.11, 0.67; Long-term SAT aHR = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.30, 0.89). Short-term SAT was significantly associated with C. difficile infection (aHR: 3.47; 95% CI: 1.38, 8.74). Short-term SAT (aHR: 7.83; 95% CI: 4.80, 12.77) and long-term SAT (aHR: 1.68; 95% CI: 1.19, 2.38) were significantly associated with antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Long-term SAT was not significantly associated with TF alone (aHR = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.32, 1.16). Conclusions: SAT was significantly associated with decreased death or TF and increased side effects. Benefits and risks must be weighed before prescribing SAT to younger, immunocompetent patients.

Abstract Background Most articles on hand hygiene report either overall compliance or compliance with specific hand hygiene moments. These moments vary in the level of risk to patients if healthcare workers (HCWs) are noncompliant. We assessed how task type affected HCWs’ hand hygiene compliance. Methods We linked consecutive tasks individual HCWs performed during the Strategies to Reduce Transmission of Antimicrobial Resistant Bacteria in Intensive Care Units (STAR*ICU) study into care sequences and identified task pairs—2 consecutive tasks and the intervening hand hygiene opportunity. We defined tasks as critical and/or contaminating. We determined the odds of critical and contaminating tasks occurring, and the odds of hand hygiene compliance using logistic regression for transition with a random effect adjusting for isolation precautions, glove use, HCW type, and compliance at prior opportunities. Results Healthcare workers were less likely to do hand hygiene before critical tasks than before other tasks (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.97 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .95–.98]) and more likely to do hand hygiene after contaminating tasks than after other tasks (aOR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.10–1.13]). Nurses were more likely to perform both critical and contaminating tasks, but nurses’ hand hygiene compliance was better than physicians’ (aOR, 0.94 [95% CI, .91–.97]) and other HCWs’ compliance (aOR, 0.87 [95% CI, .87–.94]). Conclusions Healthcare workers were more likely to do hand hygiene after contaminating tasks than before critical tasks, suggesting that habits and a feeling of disgust may influence hand hygiene compliance. This information could be incorporated into interventions to improve hand hygiene practices, particularly before critical tasks and after contaminating tasks.