Garrido-Castro, A. C.

Abstract Introduction: With emerging antibody drug conjugates (ADC) as treatment of metastatic breast cancer (mBC), it is key to understand the mechanisms that drive resistance to inform optimal ADC selection and sequencing. The AURORA (AUR) US Network was established to characterize paired primary and metastatic (met) samples via multiplatform profiling, with a prospective phase of met tissue collection that included pre and post-ADC samples. Methods: Fresh frozen or FFPE met and archival primary tumors were analyzed across 3 platforms: DNA low pass whole genome and exome sequencing (WES), DNA methylation arrays (Methyl) and RNA sequencing (RNA seq). The molecular cohort included pts with data from ≥1 platform. Pairwise gene expression comparisons were performed in R using t-tests, and pathway analysis with GSEA. Results: A total of 168 pts comprised the molecular cohort: WES, 168; Methyl, 163; RNA seq, 168. Median age at mBC diagnosis was 56 (28-88). 21 pts (12.5%) had known germline BRCA1/2 mutations; 37 (22.0%) presented with de novo mBC. Subtype at mBC (if not available, at primary) diagnosis was: 108 (64.3%) HR+/HER2-, 22 (13.1%) HER2+, 33 (19.6%) TNBC and 5 (3.0%) unknown. Among 139 pts with known subtype in the first AUR met collected, 95 (68.3%) were HR+/HER2-, 17 (12.2%) HER2+ and 27 (19.4%) TNBC. 72 pts received ≥1 ADC with 1 (0-4) median line of chemotherapy for mBC prior to ADC1. As ADC1, 42 pts received HER2 ADC (35 trastuzumab deruxtecan, T-DXd; 7 trastuzumab emtansine), 29 TROP2 ADC (28 sacituzumab govitecan, SG; 1 datopotamab deruxtecan) and 1 NECTIN4 ADC. 22 pts received ≥2 ADC (16 immediate sequence; 6 intervening therapy); 11 T-DXd and 11 SG as ADC2. Median duration of ADC1 was 141 days (6-522); 81 (7-425) for ADC2. Progressive disease was the most common reason for ADC discontinuation, denoting resistance in post-ADC samples. 99 samples were collected pre-ADC1 and 24 post-ADC1, of which 5 were pre-ADC2. ERBB2 expression did not differ between samples after HER2 (n=9) vs non-HER2 ADC (n=8) (p=0.55), nor did TACSTD2 after TROP2 (n=8) vs non-TROP2 ADC (n=9) (p=0.16). In pts with HER2+ subtype at mBC diagnosis or AUR collection who received HER2 ADC, ERBB2 expression significantly decreased in post (n=4) vs pre-treatment (n=7) samples (p=0.043). ERBB2 downregulation was observed in 5 pts with paired pre vs post-HER2 ADC samples. In pts who received TROP2 ADC, TACSTD2 expression did not differ in post (n=10) vs pre-treatment (n=47) samples (p=0.63). GSEA of post-ADC samples revealed significant pathway differences by payload, including actin cytoskeleton in post-microtubule inhibitor (MTi) vs non-MTi ADC samples (p=0.001) and ATM-dependent DNA damage response after topoisomerase I inhibitor (TOP1i) vs non-TOP1i ADCs (p=0.043). Lysosomal vesicle biogenesis (p=0.014) and calcium release (p=0.05) pathways significantly differed between ADC naïve vs treated metastases. ERBB2 hypermethylation was not detected in the cohort. TACST2 promoter methylation was observed in 10 samples (β value >0.3) without association with TROP2 ADC exposure. ERBB2 or TACSTD2 mutations were not identified in the ADC-treated cohort. A novel loss-of-function (LOF) mutation in MED12 was detected in one pt immediately post-T-DXd. MED12 LOF has been reported to promote PARP inhibitor and platinum resistance in BRCA-deficient tumors and may represent a novel resistance mechanism to TOP1i. Conclusions: Multiplatform molecular characterization of mBC treated with ADC revealed potential mechanisms of resistance related to downregulation of target expression, payload (e.g., microtubule formation, DNA damage repair) and lysosomal processing. Additional analyses integrating these multimodal data are ongoing. Strategies to overcome resistance, e.g. modifying ADC target, are being evaluated in clinical trials. Citation Format: A. C. Garrido-Castro, W. C. Nenad, J. M. Balko, T. Hinoue, G. L. Wheeler, B. J. Kelly, M. Singha, B. M. Felsheim, A. R. Michmerhuizen, U. Chandran, A. V. Lee, L. A. Carey, T. A. King, E. Mardis, P. W. Laird, K. V. Giridhar, K. A. Hoadley, C. M. Perou. Molecular characterization of resistance to antibody drug conjugates in metastatic breast cancer: a prospective analysis from the AURORA US Network [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-09.

Abstract Background: Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) often have short survival, and clinical disease management is challenging due to tumor heterogeneity, treatment resistance, and unique contributions of organ-specific metastatic microenvironments. Methods: The retrospective and prospective phases of the AURORA US Metastasis Project have profiled samples from 220 MBC patients using RNA-seq, DNA-seq, and DNA methylation arrays. RNA-seq has been performed on 392 specimens from 143 primary tumors and 249 metastases. In total, there are 162 primary-metastasis pairs from 134 patients (13 patients have 2+ metastases profiled). The 249 metastatic samples include 116 liver, 29 lymph node, 17 lung, 14 bone, 10 brain, and 8 skin metastases. Each specimen was assayed to determine its clinical and molecular subtypes. Here we investigate the molecular causes of clinical and PAM50 subtype switching in primary tumor-metastasis pairs using multi-platform data. Results: Of the patients with paired data in the AURORA dataset, 38/134 (28%) had clinical subtype (HR+/HER2+, HR-/HER2+, HR+/HER2-, TNBC) switches between the primary tumor and paired metastasis. The most common clinical subtype switch was loss of hormone receptor expression (16/38 patients) in the metastatic tumor. Many of these observations have been confirmed by concomitant RNA and/or DNA changes. In addition, 59/134 (44%) patients had PAM50 molecular subtype switches. 26/59 (44%) patients had a Luminal A primary tumor which switched either into Luminal B (16/26) or HER2-Enriched (7/26) subtypes, suggesting recurrent progression mechanisms during metastasis. For example, patient ARRP had a Luminal A primary tumor and a HER2-Enriched bone metastasis. Using DNA clonality data, we identified a clonal mutation in the DNA binding domain of FOXA1 (H247L) as well as mutations in CDH1 (frameshift) and NLRC3 (Q650H) that originated in the primary tumor. A distinct, dominant clone arose in the metastasis, harboring oncogenic activating mutations in PIK3CA (H1047R) and ERBB2 (L869R). There was also an increase in RNA expression of ERBB2 and FGFR4 but no change in ERBB2 copy number. This is in alignment with previous publications demonstrating a shift to the HER2-Enriched subtype, often without gain of HER2 amplification. Interestingly, there were 21 patients that had both clinical and PAM50 subtype switches. Patient ANFC had a HR+/HER2- primary tumor (Luminal A) and a TNBC liver metastasis (HER2-Enriched). Notably, the metastasis lost clinical expression of ER and PR (by IHC), and this was also observed through a decrease in ESR1 and PGR mRNA expression. Using DNA clonality data, we identified 5 new clones in the metastasis that were not present in the primary tumor. Finally, we observed that basal-like primary tumors with a PAM50 subtype switch in the paired metastasis had a significantly lower correlation to the basal-like centroid compared to primary tumors with a basal-like paired metastasis (p=0.0053). This suggests that either these tumors had significant intra-tumoral heterogeneity in the primary tumor and the metastasis originated from a non-basal-like portion of the tumor, or the switches from a basal-like primary tumor are a byproduct of the PAM50 bioinformatics algorithm (i.e. the tumor is very close to 2 subtype centroids). Ongoing analyses will precisely determine which subtype switches can be attributed to genetic or epigenetic causes, organ site biases, and/or bioinformatic methodologies. Conclusions: Using multi-platform molecular analyses, we identified cases of clinical and molecular subtype switching in primary-metastasis pairs. These findings begin to elucidate the underlying molecular drivers of tumor progression and subtype switching in patients with MBC, which may have implications for clinical treatment. Citation Format: A. R. Michmerhuizen, B. M. Felsheim, G. L. Wheeler, B. J. Kelly, M. Singha, T. Hinoue, W. C. Nenad, A. C. Garrido-Castro, J. M. Balko, K. Giridhar, U. Chandran, A. V. Lee, L. A. Carey, T. A. King, K. A. Hoadley, P. W. Laird, E. R. Mardis, C. M. Perou, AURORA US Metastasis Network. Molecular causes of subtype switching in primary and metastatic breast tumor pairs from the AURORA US Project [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-06.