Sayegh, Jonathan

Background: Indications for TAVR explant have been established, although limited data exist regarding pre-TAVR baseline characteristics that predict eventual explantation. Methods: The TriNetX network, a database comprising medical records from over 105 institutions, was used. Two cohorts were created: those who underwent TAVR without explant and those requiring subsequent TAVR explant and SAVR. Predictors of explantation were analyzed by multivariate models. Results: Among the 63,377 patients undergoing TAVR, 273 (0.4%) required explantation. Patients in the explant group were younger (69.1 ± 11.3 vs. 78.1 ± 8.8 years; p < 0.001), more likely to have a thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) (10.6% vs. 4.7%; p < 0.001) and had higher LDL levels (88.2 ± 41.3 vs. 80.7 ± 34.6 mg/dL; p = 0.011). They also had increased post-TAVR rates of acute kidney injury (9.2% vs. 5.2%; p = 0.004) and paravalvular leak (5.9% vs. 0.9%; p < 0.001). Age at TAVR (HR 1.04; CI 1.03–1.06), baseline TAA (HR 1.69; CI 1.09–2.63), history of infective endocarditis (HR 1.92; CI 1.10–3.35), and higher LDL (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00–1.03) were independent predictors for explantation. Conclusions: Younger age at TAVR, TAA, history of endocarditis, and elevated baseline LDL were notable predictors of explantation. These findings highlight the necessity of pre-procedural assessment and follow-up in high-risk patients to optimize TAVR durability.

Abstract Background Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (VEDS) and Marfan’s syndrome are associated with cardiovascular complications, including arrhythmias. However, atrial fibrillation (AF) risk in these populations has not been frequently reported. This study assessed the AF risk in VEDS and Marfan's syndrome patients using propensity score-matched analysis from an international database. Methods The TriNetX Research Network, an international database with de-identified patient data from over 100 centers, was used to pull patients with a diagnosis of VEDS and Marfan's Syndrome. Baseline characteristics (e.g., demographics, cardiovascular comorbidities, etc.) were collected, and propensity score matching was performed to balance the cohorts. Rates of AF were collected across both cohorts, and risk analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival were used to assess outcomes. Results A total of 1,114 and 23,172 patients had VEDS and Marfan’s syndrome, respectively. After propensity score matching, each cohort included 1,091 balanced patients regarding demographics and clinical characteristics. When compared in the matched cohorts, AF incidence was lower in VEDS (4.6%) compared to Marfan’s syndrome (8.6%), with a risk difference of -0.040 (95% CI: -0.061, -0.020; z = -3.794; p &lt; 0.001). The risk ratio was 0.532 (95% CI: 0.381, 0.742), and the odds ratio was 0.509 (95% CI: 0.358, 0.726), indicating a significantly lower risk of AF in VEDS. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed an AF survival probability of 84.23% in VEDS and 78.20% in Marfan’s syndrome (log-rank p = 0.071). The hazard ratio was 0.723 (95% CI: 0.508, 1.029), which didn’t reach statistical significance (p = 0.579). Conclusion Patients with VEDS have a significantly lower risk of developing AF compared to those with Marfan’s syndrome. However, no significant difference in AF survival probability was observed. These findings suggest significant differences in the arrhythmic burden between these connective tissue disorders, which can direct future risk stratification and management strategies.Figure 1

Abstract Background Marfan syndrome (MFS) predisposes individuals to aortic dissections. Recent data suggest that atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter (AF/AFL) may increase complications and mortality in MFS patients; however, their independent role in aortic dissection remains unclear. Purpose This study aims to assess the risk of aortic dissection in MFS patients with and without AF/AFL. Methods Using the TriNetX database and ICD-10 codes, 2,447 MFS patients with AF/AFL and 20,520 without were identified. Demographics (age, sex, race, ethnicity) were evaluated, and aortic dissection outcomes were compared using risk ratios and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results Patients in the AF/AFL cohort were older (mean age 60.9 ± 16.7 years vs. 38 ± 16.6 years) and had higher proportions of males (62.51% vs. 56.76%) and white patients (74.67% vs. 66.3%). Aortic dissections occurred in 13.9% of MFS patients with AF/AFL compared to 3.4% of those without, resulting in a risk difference of 10.5% (95% CI: 9.0%–11.9%) and a risk ratio of 4.04 (95% CI: 3.547–4.603). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significantly lower survival rates in the AF/AFL cohort (74.07% vs. 90.63%; log-rank test, p &lt; 0.0001), with a hazard ratio of 4.232 (95% CI: 3.686–4.858). Conclusion In MFS patients, those with AF/AFL were over four times more likely to experience aortic dissection and had over four times the hazard of mortality. Screening and managing AF/AFL may be essential to preventing aortic dissections and improving outcomes in this population.Figure 1

Abstract Background Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (VEDS) and Marfan’s syndrome are associated with cardiovascular complications, including arrhythmias. However, ventricular tachycardia (VT) risk in these populations has not been frequently reported. Purpose This study aims to assess the VT risk in VEDS and Marfan's syndrome patients through an international database. Methods The TriNetX database was used to pull patients with a diagnosis of VEDS and Marfan's Syndrome. Baseline characteristics (e.g., demographics, cardiovascular comorbidities, etc.) were collected, and propensity score matching was performed to balance the cohorts. Risk analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival were used to assess outcomes. Results A total of 1,114 and 23,172 patients had VEDS and Marfan’s syndrome, respectively. After propensity score matching, each cohort included 1,091 balanced patients regarding demographics and clinical characteristics. The cohorts were balanced with a mean age of 37.7 ± 16.0 years in both groups. 68.7% and 68.8% were females in the VEDS and Marfan cohorts, the majority being White (82.2% in VEDS, 82.9% in Marfan’s). VT Incidence was lower in VEDS (0.9%) compared to Marfan’s syndrome (2.6%), with a risk difference of -0.016 (p = 0.003). Kaplan-Meier survival showed higher survival in VEDS (99.44%) vs. Marfan’s (94.04%, log-rank p = 0.002). The risk ratio for VT in VEDS was 0.357 (95% CI: 0.174, 0.732). Conclusion VEDS patients have a significantly lower VT risk compared to those with Marfan’s syndrome. These findings suggest significant differences in the arrhythmic burden between these connective tissue disorders, which can direct future risk stratification and management strategies.