Ferriolli, Eduardo

Importance Sex and racial or ancestral disparities in Alzheimer disease remain incompletely understood; autopsy studies that examine amyloid, tau, and genetic factors are scarce. Objective To test whether neuritic plaque burden and cognitive outcomes differ by sex and whether sex modifies the effects of apolipoprotein E ε4 ( APOEε4 ), informant-reported race, and African ancestry. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a cross-sectional study using postmortem neuropathological data from the Biobank for Aging Studies, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. A total of 2268 autopsies from a population-based, diverse clinicopathological sample were collected between April 2004 and March 2025. Exposures Sex, informant-reported race (Black, White), African ancestry proportion, and APOEε4 carrier status. Main Outcomes and Measures Neuritic plaque burden (Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease [CERAD] score), and cognitive function (Clinical Dementia Rating–Sum of Boxes [CDR-SB]). Ordinal logistic regression examined association of sex with CERAD scores and 2- and 3-way interactions among sex, race, ancestry, and APOEε4 ; adjusting for age, education, vascular factors, and Braak stages. Linear models related pathology to CDR-SB, adding copathologies. Results The analysis included 2268 autopsies (median [IQR] age, 74.8 [63.8-83.3] years; 1152 [51% male] and 1116 [49%] female; 802 [35%] Black and 1466 [65%] White; other race groups not included owing to small numbers); female individuals were older than male individuals and more likely to exhibit cognitive impairment (CDR global score ≥0.5). Female individuals had higher plaque burden than male individuals (unadjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.97; 95% CI, 1.67-2.29; P < .001), and this association remained significant in adjusted models for sociodemographic and vascular factors and APOEε4 status (adjusted OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.33-2.20; P < .001). APOEε4 carriers of both sexes had an approximately 4-fold greater odds of plaques. Significant 2-way interactions were found between sex, APOEε4 status, race, and ancestry on CERAD scores. Black noncarriers (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.34-0.67) and noncarriers of African ancestry (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.43-0.76) were least likely to have high plaque burden, whereas this protection was weakened in ε4 carriers. No significant 3-way interaction was detected. Among individuals with a CERAD score of 2 or higher, female individuals were more likely than male individuals to reach Braak stage V-VI than male individuals (probability ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.13-1.38; P = .002). Adding Braak stage to multivariable models attenuated the female-male difference in plaques and interaction of sex and plaque on CDR-SB was no longer significant. Conclusions and Relevance The findings indicate that female sex, APOEε4 , and both race and African ancestry were jointly associated with amyloid in this study population. Excess amyloid among women may partly explain their greater tau burden and steeper cognitive decline. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating sex, race, and ancestry into biomarker thresholds, risk stratification, and the design of preventive or disease-modifying trials for Alzheimer disease.

BACKGROUND: Cerebrovascular disease is prevalent in older adults and is associated with cognitive impairment. Although the association between brain infarcts and cognition has been widely investigated, the contribution of vascular disease to cognitive impairment has been less studied, particularly in non-White populations. We investigated the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of vascular disease phenotypes and their association with cognitive abilities in a diverse population. METHODS: In a Brazilian population–based clinicopathological study (recruitment between 2004 and 2024), inclusion criteria were age at death ≥18 years and the availability of an informant. Clinical information and cognitive abilities were assessed through informant interviews. Hyaline arteriolosclerosis (HA) was evaluated in 13 brain areas and categorized as absent, mild, moderate, or severe. Moderate/severe HA defined microvascular disease (Micro[+]). Intracranial atherosclerosis in the circle of Willis was similarly classified, with moderate/severe cases defining macrovascular disease (Macro[+]). Four vascular profiles were compared: Micro[+]/Macro[+], Micro[−]/Macro[+], Micro[+]/Macro[−], and Micro[−]/Macro[−]. Linear regression models adjusted for sociodemographic, clinical, and cerebrovascular/neurodegenerative lesions evaluated the association of cognition with vascular profiles, and microvascular and macrovascular diseases separately. RESULTS: Of 2418 participants, 834 with missing data were excluded, yielding a final sample of 1584 individuals (mean age, 74.3±13.4 years; 776 [49%] women; 982 [62%] White). Microvascular disease was slightly more frequent (31%) than macrovascular (29%). Regarding vascular profiles, 788 (50%) participants were Micro[−]/Macro[−], 334 (21%) Micro[+]/Macro[−], 301 (19%) Micro[−]/Macro[+], and 161 (10%) Micro[+]/Macro[+]. Micro[+] participants were older and more frequently women, and had worse cognitive abilities. Vascular groups were similar regarding most clinical comorbidities. HA (β, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.25–1.36]; P =0.004) and Micro[+]/Macro[+] phenotype (β, 1.25 [95% CI, 0.38–2.12]; P =0.005) were associated with worse cognitive abilities compared with HA-negative and Micro[−]/Macro[−] participants, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: HA was as frequent as intracranial atherosclerosis. HA and the vascular phenotype with both microvascular and macrovascular diseases were associated with worse cognition.