Paternoster, Sarah F.

Abstract Introduction: A new isodicentric variant of del(20q) was recently described; namely ider(20)(p11.2)del(20)(q11.2q13.3). The frequency and clinical significance of this anomaly are not yet established. This anomaly is usually missed in routine cytogenetic studies and the common commercial FISH probe, D20S108, does not distinguish between del(20q) and ider(20q). The goals of this study were to determine 1) the frequency and hematopathology of patients (pts) with ider(20q) and 2) the best cytogenetic methods to distinguish among various del(20q) anomalies. Methods: We selected 12 pts referred for chromosome studies with -20,+mar to look for evidence of ider(20q). For comparison, we also randomly selected 12 pts with classical del(20q). Up to 10 bone marrow metaphases were studied for each of these 24 pts using FISH with probes for 20pter, JAG1 (20p12), centromere 20, D20S108 (20q12) and 20qter. We also studied 200 interphase nuclei from each pt using D20S108 and 20qter probes. We reviewed cytogenetic results for a consecutive series of pts in our hematological practice between 9/1/05 and 12/31/05 to establish the frequency of ider(20q). Blood and marrow slides were available for microscopic evaluation in 9 of 12 pts. with ider(20q). Results: By metaphase FISH, each of the 12 pts with del(20q) were 20pter+, JAG1+, D20S108- and 20qter+ indicating an interstitial deletion. Each of the 12 pts with ider(20q) were 20pter-, JAG1-, D20S108-- and 20qter++ indicating an isodicentric chromosome with an interstitial del(20q) on either side of the centromere. The ider(20q) is best detected using probe for D20S108 and 20qter. By FISH each pt with ider(20q) had a mixture of cells with del(20q) and ider(20q), though cells with only del(20q) were not usually detected by chromosome studies. One pt had a subclone with two copies of ider(20q). Interphase FISH identified del(20q) and ider(20q) in each specimen. Hematopathology studies of 9 pts with ider(20q) indicated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with multilineage dysplasia in 1 and myelodysplastic syndrome in 8 (refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia (RCMD) in 3, RCMD with ringed sideroblasts in 3, atypical myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative disease in 1, and refractory anemia with excess blasts-2 (RAEB-2) in 1). Additional chromosome anomalies were detected in the pts with AML with multilineage dysplasia and RAEB-2. Six pts had dysgranulopoiesis in addition to dysmegakaryopoiesis and/or dyserythropoiesis. Among 5,744 pts in our hematological clinical practice screened by interphase FISH, ider(20q) was seen in 8, but 8 of 78 pts with del(20q) also had ider(20q). Discussion: In clinical practice ider(20q) is common in hematological disorders and occurs in 0.14% of all pts and in 10% of pts with del(20q). This figure may underestimate the true frequency of ider(20q) because novel FISH studies with D20S108 and 20qter are required to confirm its presence. When G-banding preparations indicate -20,+mar, then ider(20q) should be suspected. The literature is sparse but pts with ider(20q) appeared to have a more consistent presentation of multilineage dysplasia with additional involvement of the granulocytic series than pts with del(20q). These results suggest that it is helpful to distinguish among various forms of del(20q) in clinical practice using both chromosome and FISH studies with D20S108 and 20qter.

Abstract Background: Results of conventional cytogenetic studies on specimens processed without B-cell mitogens are usually normal in B-CLL: this observation is often attributed to lack of mitotic B-CLL cells. Using metaphase FISH with D13S319, we now have evidence that these apparently normal mitotic B-CLL cells often exhibit submicroscopic interstitial deletions in 13q14. This observation indicates B-CLL cells do divide in unstimulated cultures, but the abnormal metaphases are not detected because the abnormalities are submicroscopic and represent a low percentage of proliferating cells. Methods: We studied 12 patients with B-CLL who had normal metaphases by conventional cytogenetics, but abnormal interphase nuclei by FISH with D13S319. This cohort consisted of 7 females and 5 males who ranged in age from 50 to 87 years. Clinical information was available for 11 patients: Rai stages were 0, I, II, III, or IV for 6, 1, 1, 2, and 1 patients, respectively; 8 patients received treatment and 3 have died. Conventional cytogenetic studies and metaphase FISH were done on bone marrow specimens that were processed by standard 24 and 48-hour unstimulated cultures with Chang Medium BMC. Interphase FISH studies were done on blood or bone marrow (collected within 3 days of specimens for conventional cytogenetic studies) using probes to detect anomalies of chromosomes 6, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 17. For each patient, metaphase FISH was done with commercial probes from Vysis Inc., Downers Grove, IL for D13S319/13q34 using leftover fixed cells from conventional cytogenetics studies. Results: Metaphase FISH results were normal for 3 bone marrow specimens: the remaining 9 specimens had 1.9 to 13.8% metaphases with interstitial deletions of 13q14. One patient had a cytogenetically visible chromosome 13 deletion in 2.2% of metaphases. In the remaining 8 specimens, the size of the abnormal 13 was similar to the normal 13 homolog and other acrocentric chromosomes. By comparison, interphase FISH revealed 13 to 93% nuclei with 13q-x1 or 13q-x2. Seven patients had additonal anomalies in their interphase nuclei; 3 had 11q-, 2 had 17p-, 1 had +12 and 1 had +IGH. Conclusions: This investigation indicates that metaphase FISH detects submicroscopic deletions in chromosome 13 as well as infrequent mitotic B-CLL cells in patients who have normal conventional cytogenetic results. Therefore, metaphase FISH is a novel and useful technique to detect abnormal mitotic cells in B-CLL in cultures without special B-cell mitogens. The prognostic significance of abnormal metaphase FISH results is still under investigation. We speculate that this method will allow for identification of more aggressive proliferating disease even in so-called “favorable” prognostic groups based on interphase FISH results.

Abstract Background: Loss of p53 is detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in interphase nuclei in 8–10% of patients with B-CLL and has been associated with aggressive disease and poor response to therapy. Results of chromosome studies suggest loss of p53 is often due to structural anomalies of chromosome 17 rather than monosomy 17. To characterize chromosome 17 anomalies in B-CLL, we used interphase and metaphase FISH to study a series of patients with this disorder. Methods: We studied 16 patients with B-CLL who had chromosome 17 anomalies detected by conventional chromosome studies or interphase FISH. The study cohort consisted of 8 females and 8 males (age 54 – 73 years). Clinical data was available for 15 patients: Rai stages were I, II, III and IV for 1, 2, 6 and 6 patients, respectively; 14 patients received treatment and 10 have died. Metaphase and interphase FISH studies were performed using left-over fixed bone marrow or peripheral blood cell pellets from conventional cytogenetic studies. To identify recurrent chromosome 17 breakpoint cluster regions, patients were first studied with p53(17p13.1) and D17Z1(centromere17), and then with FISH probes for SMS(17p11.2) and RARA(17q21). For patients retaining the SMS probe site, we did FISH for HNPP(17p11.2–12) and D17Z1(centromere17). A total of 200 interphase nuclei and up to 20 metaphases were analyzed by each probe set. Results: The karyotype was normal for 3 patients and complex involving various abnormalities of chromosome 17 for the remaining 13. All patients showed loss of one p53 probe site with retention of both chromosome 17 centromeres. The SMS locus was absent in 13 patients indicating a breakpoint cluster region between the centromere and SMS probe site. In the remaining 3 patients, HNPP was absent, but the SMS probe site was retained indicating chromosome breakage between the SMS and HNPP probe sites. Metaphase FISH results indicate loss of p53 was due to an isochromosome 17p11.2 in 4 patients and an unbalanced translocation involving 17p11.2 in 12 patients. Conclusions: This study shows that loss of p53 in B-CLL cells is due to isochromosome formation or unbalanced translocations that involve a ~6,400 kb breakpoint cluster region adjacent to the centromere on the short arm of chromosome 17. Importantly, our findings indicate that loss of p53 is not due to loss of chromosome 17, simple deletions of p53, or chromosome breakage near the p53 locus. The region between the centromere and HNPP on chromosome 17 is known to be rich in low copy repeats and homologous DNA sequences are dispersed throughout the genome. In somatic cells, these repeats can result in pairing of the same or different chromosomes; crossing over within these homologous regions can result in translocations or isochromosomes. Undoubtedly, this genetic mechanism plays an important role in the origin of structural anomalies of chromosome 17 in B-CLL.

Abstract This phase 1 clinical trial evaluated the safety and effects of autologous dendritic cells (DC) injected to patients in late chronic or accelerated phase of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Seven patients with a median age of 63 years (range 55–78) entered the trial. Median time from diagnosis to registration was 38 months (range 16–94). Two patients were in the accelerated phase of disease based on the presence of additional bone marrow chromosomal abnormalities, all other patients were in chronic phase. Prior therapies included hydroxyurea and alpha interferon with or without cytosine arabinoside. Four patients were on therapy with imatinib mesylate during the course of the trial, two were treated before imatinib became available and one was previously intolerant of imatinib. CD14+ monocytes were selected from a leukapheresis product by clinical grade immunoadsorption (Miltenyi Biotec). The monocytes were matured to CD83+ and bcr-abl+ DC after 10 days in culture with X-VIVO 15 medium with 1% human AB serum, GM-CSF, IL-4, as the base culture media followed by maturation mediated by TNF-alpha, IL-6 and prostaglandin E2. The first patient entered had a positive mycoplasma reaction by polymerase chain reaction at the time of his first DC injection, the cells were not given and he was withdrawn from the study. The other six patients were treated in two cohorts of three patients and received four injections each of 3x106 DC and 15x106 DC per injection, respectively. CML-DC injections were generally well tolerated and all non-hematologic toxicities were ≤ grade 2. All injections were given intra-nodally into a cervical lymph node except in the first patient where the DCs were injected subcutaneously. We observed no major clinical responses, but the white blood cell counts normalized or were maintained at normal level in four patients during therapy. Three patients experienced a transient reduction in the percentage of bcr-abl+ cells suggesting that the treatment may have affected the cells in a leukemia specific manner. We detected vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the plasma prior to therapy. In four of five patients, VEGF levels decreased by more than 75 percent during therapy. T cells isolated from patients’ blood and incubated with autologous CML DC before, during and after therapy showed increased proliferation and secretion of interferon gamma during the course of therapy. DCs from three patients were transfected with a recombinant replication-defective adenovirus carrying the gene for IL-2 under a constitutively active promoter. IL-2 secreted by transfected dendritic cells enhanced in vitro T cell proliferation and interferon gamma release and these effects increased with increasing numbers of DC injections. This study demonstrates that CML-DC can be prepared from the blood of patients treated with imatinib mesylate, that they can be administered safely and that progress of therapy is accompanied by an increase in DC-specific T cell reactivity and a decrease in circulating VEGF.

Abstract Background: In B-CLL, the observation of interphase cells with hemizygous D13S319 deletion at 13q14 (13q-x1) as a sole anomaly in blood is widely considered a favorable prognosis. The observation of cells with 11q-, +12 or 17p- has been associated with a relatively poor prognosis. Over the past 1.5 yrs, 16.2% (174/1,076) of patients (pts) referred for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing for B-CLL in our clinical practice had a clone with homozygous D13S319 deletion (13q-x2), but the prognostic significance of this observation is poorly understood. Moreover, 39.3% (142/361) of pts with unfavorable FISH anomalies have 13q-x1 and/or 13q-x2 and the clinical significance of this observation is also unknown. Thus, we investigated pts with 13q- (with or without other chromosome anomalies) to establish the relative clinical significance of 13q- in B-CLL. Methods: We studied 333 pts with B-CLL sampled between 9/1999 and 6/2004 who had FISH performed on interphase nuclei from blood. The FISH probe set was designed to detect 6q-, 11q-, +12, 13q-, 17p-, and translocations involving IgH at 14q32. We classified pts into four groups: 13q-x1 only (group 1), 13q-x1 and 13q-x2 only (group 2), 13q-x2 only (group 3) and 13q-x1 and/or 13q-x2 plus other FISH anomalies (group 4). FISH groups were compared with gender, age, Rai stage, treatment status, time to treatment, CD38 and IgVH mutation. Results: Of the 333 pts, 171 (51.3%) had a 13q-: 71 were in group 1, 25 in group 2, 26 in group 3 and 49 in group 4. %CD38+ differed significantly across FISH groups; in pairwise analyses, the proportion of pts with >30% CD38+ was significantly greater for pts in group 4 vs. group 3 (p=0.0015) although no significant differences were observed for group 3 vs. group 1 or vs. group 2. Pts in group 3 were not significantly different from other FISH groups for Rai stage, IgVH mutation or gender. The median percentage of abnormal nuclei for pts with group 1 was 54.5% vs. 79.5% for pts in group 4 (p<0.0001). The median percent abnormal nuclei for pts in groups 3 and 2 was 72.5% and 68.5%, respectively. Median % abnormal nuclei for group 3 was not significantly different than the other FISH groups. Treatment status was available on 147 pts, where the proportion of pts who had treatment in each group was as follows: group 1, 15/66; group 2, 2/22; group 3, 4/21; and group 4, 9/38. Due to limited sample size and heavy censoring, any analysis on time to treatment is preliminary; however, these early analyses suggest group 4 pts have a lower median time to treatment (9 yrs) compared to groups 3 and 1 (12.3 and 13 yrs, respectively). Conclusions: This study has generated new information about the 13q- anomaly in B-CLL. First, known prognostic markers for B-CLL pts with 13q-x2 are not significantly different than for pts with 13q-x1 or 13q-x1/13q-x2. Second, 13q-x1 and/or 13q-x2 occurring with other unfavorable FISH anomalies have an unfavorable prognosis; i.e. potential benefits of 13q- are trumped when it is observed with unfavorable FISH anomalies. Thus, patients with any form of 13q- alone may have indolent disease while patients with 13q- and unfavorable FISH anomalies should be considered to be in a more aggressive phase.

Abstract Background: Using fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH), a number of investigators have identified specific cytogenetic abnormalities that identify CLL patients with a more aggressive (17p-, 11q-) or indolent (13q-) disease course. Some have suggested patients who initially have a normal karyotype may acquire new chromosome abnormalities during the course of their disease. Since patients with specific cytogenetic abnormalities (17p-, 11q-) are less likely to respond to purine nucleoside analogues, such clonal evolution has potential implications for treatment as well as prognosis. No study has prospectively investigated the frequency of clonal evolution in a cohort of patients with newly diagnosed untreated CLL. Methods: Between 1994 and 2000, we enrolled 167 patients with previously untreated CLL seen at Mayo Clinic in a prospective trial evaluating the prognostic importance of cytogenetic abnormalities and clonal evolution detected by FISH. All patients provided a baseline blood specimen for FISH testing and follow-up specimens over the following 24 months. Other research samples from later timepoints were tested where available. Study participants were contacted by mail in 2004 to update vital and treatment status. Of 83 living responders, 70 (84%) indicated they would be willing to provide an additional follow-up sample for cytogenetic analysis of whom 48 have returned a sample to date. Results of clinical FISH testing during the follow-up interval were also abstracted. FISH was performed on interphase nuclei from blood as we have previously described (BJH 121:287). Results: Median age at diagnosis was 64. Median time from diagnosis to study enrollment was 3.3 months. 94% of patients had early stage disease at enrollment (88 Rai 0; 48 Rai I, 18 Rai II, 2 Rai III; 8 Rai IV). Median follow-up time from diagnosis for all 164 eligible study participants was 8.5 years (range: 0.33–22.9 yrs). As of last follow-up, 48% of patients have received treatment and 57 (35%) have died. 75% of patients had chromosome abnormalities on FISH testing at baseline. The frequency of individual cytogenetic abnormalities on baseline FISH analysis along with overall survival by hierarchical FISH risk category are shown in Table I. 106 patients had sequential samples for FISH analysis at least 2 years apart, 61 had samples at least 5 years apart, and 22 had samples at least 10 years apart. 15 patients had evidence of clonal evolution during follow up as evidenced by a new FISH anomaly not present on the baseline specimen. No clonal evolution was observed in the first 2 years of follow-up (n=106), however of 61 patients with samples at least 5 years apart, 14 (23%) had evidence of clonal evolution. Median time for development of a new cytogenetic abnormality among these patients was 9.3 years. Conclusions: Clonal evolution occurs during the course of disease for approximately 25% of patients with early stage CLL. Clonal evolution appears to occur at low frequency during the first 2 years of follow-up but increases in frequency after 5 years. This finding has potentially significant implications for prognosis and treatment of patients with CLL. FISH Risk Category* N (Baseline) Median Overall Survival (Years) * Difference between groups significant p=0.0038 13q- x 1 37 14.4 13q- x2 35 17 Normal Karyotype 40 13.2 12+ 24 11.1 11q- 12 8.6 17p- 10 10.5 6q- 2 4.1 Other 2 Not reached

Abstract Genetic analysis has an increasing role in the diagnosis, classification, and management of patients with CLL. Although translocations involving the IgH locus are well characterized in B-cell malignancies such as follicular cell lymphoma, their frequency and significance in CLL are less well defined. We studied a series of patients with a clinical diagnosis of CLL using a FISH probe set including IgH. Methods: FISH was performed on blood using a DNA probe set designed to detect common chromosome anomalies associated with CLL and translocations involving IgH. Patients with an IgH abnormality were further studied using FISH probes sets for IgH and cyclin D1, BCL-2, BCL-3, BCL-6, BCL-11a, c-MYC, MALT-1, c-MAF, FGFR-3 or PAX-5. The clinical presentation, pathology, and flow cytometric immunophenotype was reviewed in patients with various translocations involving IgH. Results: Between 1/1/03 and 6/15/04, samples from 1032 patients with a clinical diagnosis of CLL were analyzed by FISH. Of these, 76 patients (7%) had translocations involving the IgH locus. Sixty one patients had a single translocation partner gene (cyclin D1 45%, BCL-2 24%, BCL-3 8%, c-MYC 2.5%, or BCL-11a 1.3%). Two patients had two independent clones (cyclin D1 and BCL-2; BCL-3 and BCL-11a). In 13 pts (17%) we could not identify the translocation partner. Thirty five (46%) of the 76 patients with IgH translocations had been seen at Mayo Clinic Rochester and had clinical and laboratory data for detailed review. Among these 35 patients, 16 (45%) had fusion of IgH and cyclin D1 and were diagnosed with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). The immunophenotype of the monoclonal B cells was typical of MCL (CD5+, CD23-) in 6 patients and typical of CLL (CD5+, CD23+) in 4 patients. Six MCL patients had non-diagnostic immunophenotypes: CD5-, CD 23+ (n = 3) and CD5-, CD23- (n = 3). Twelve (34%) of the 35 patients had the IGH/BCL-2 fusion gene. Of these, 3 patients had leukemic phase follicular lymphoma, one had both CLL and MCL, and 8 had the diagnostic immunophenotype of CLL. The remaining 7 patients (19%) had a variety of translocation partners: BCL-3 (n = 1), BCL-3 and BCL-11a (n = 1), c-MYC (n = 2), and unknown (n = 3). The patients with a translocation involving BCL-3 had a typical CLL immunophenotype. Discussion: The IgH FISH probe detected a molecular defect in 7% of patients with a circulating monoclonal B cell population. In patients with a CLL immunophenotype, use of the IgH probe identified the IgH/cyclin D1 translocation characteristic of MCL in 4 patients, a finding of major clinical significance. Interestingly, after exclusion of MCL patients, more than 4% patients with CLL had other translocations involving IgH, a proportion comparable with other better defined chromosomal abnormalities in CLL. Although IgH/BCL-2 translocation is usually associated with follicular lymphoma, we identified 8 patients with CLL and this translocation. Translocations involving BCL-3 had been described before in CLL with an “atypical” immunophenotype. In contrast both of our patients with BCL-3 had typical phenotypes. Translocations involving IgH and BCL-11a have not been previously described. We conclude that FISH studies using the IgH probe improve the precision of diagnosis in CLL and could also have prognostic value.

Abstract Background: In 2006 Lenalidomide received FDA approval for myelodysplasia (MDS) with interstitial deletion 5q [del(5q)] based on conventional cytogenetic (CC) results before and after treatment. In clinical practice, FISH studies of interphase nuclei with probes for EGR1 are widely used to detect del(5q), but it is not known whether this method has similar efficacy as CC. Thus, we compared CC and FISH results for various forms of del(5q). Methods: We selected 145 patients (pts) in our cytogenetic database with del(5q). These pts had various forms of del(5q) and were representative of our clinical practice. This series included 9 pts with MDS that were studied before and after treatment with Lenalidomide. CC studies were done using standard procedures to analyze 20 metaphases from bone marrow. FISH studies were done on the same specimens using stored left-over cells and standard procedures for EGR1 (5q31.2) and D5S23/D5S721 (5p15.2). The cutoff for del(5q) for FISH was <6.0% based on 200 nuclei. Results: Among 145 pts, 104 were referred for MDS, 9 acute myeloid leukemia, 9 lymphoproliferative disorders, 7 myeloproliferative disorders and 16 without clinical information. A total of 116 pts had breakpoints at del(5)(q13q33), 17 del(5)(q15q33), 8 del(5)(q11.2~q31q31~q35), 3 del(5)(q22q33) and 1 del(5)(q13q22). Del(5q) was detected in 144 pts by both CC and FISH. One pt had del(5)(q13q22) in 20/20 metaphases but was normal by FISH. Percent abnormal cells by FISH was lower in 135/145 pts compared to CC (mean difference 22.5 ± 19.6, range −42 to 98). For 9 pts with MDS, 29 specimens were collected before and after treatment with Lenalidomide: 7 achieved complete cytogenetic remission (four relapsed) and 2 showed a decrease in percent abnormal metaphases. Results of CC and FISH for these 9 pts were concordant for detection of del(5q) and trend of tumor burden due to treatment for 28/29 specimens. The discordant specimen was collected 222 days after treatment; results of CC were normal but FISH was abnormal in 19% of nuclei. Among the 29 specimens, percent abnormal cells by FISH was lower than CC in 27 (mean difference 13.9% ± 22.5, range −19.0 to 73.5). Each of the 9 treated pts had only del(5q) prior to treatment, and was detected by both FISH and CC. After treatment, FISH did not detect a separate cytogenetic clone involving deletion 20q without del(5q) in 2 pts nor did it identify development of other anomalies in 3 pts. Conclusions: Results of CC and FISH were mostly concordant, but differed in 4 respects. First, 1/145 pts was normal by FISH but had del(5q) by CC. This pt had unusual breakpoints that did not result in loss of EGR1. Second, percentage of cells with del(5q) was usually lower by FISH than CC. This observation is likely related to a different mitotic rate of cells with del(5q) versus normal cells. Third, 1 specimen was abnormal by FISH but normal by CC after treatment, but 2 subsequent specimens were concordant. This discrepancy was likely due to interference of mitosis of del(5q) cells and residual non-proliferating disease. Fourth, 2 treated pts developed a separate cytogenetic clone without del(5q) and 3 developed other anomalies that could not be detected by FISH. We believe FISH for EGR1 is useful in clinical practice, but not a substitute for CC.

Purpose Retrospective studies suggest cytogenetic abnormalities detected by interphase fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) can identify patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who will experience a more aggressive disease course. Other studies suggest that patients may acquire chromosome abnormalities during the course of their disease. There are minimal prospective data on the clinical utility of the widely used hierarchical FISH prognostic categories in patients with newly diagnosed early-stage CLL or the frequency of clonal evolution as determined by interphase FISH. Patients and Methods Between 1994 and 2002, we enrolled 159 patients with previously untreated CLL (83% Rai stage 0/I) on a prospective trial evaluating clonal evolution by FISH. Patients provided baseline and follow-up specimens for FISH testing during 2 to 12 years. Results Chromosomal abnormalities detected by FISH at study entry predicted overall survival. Eighteen patients experienced clonal evolution during follow-up. The rate of clonal evolution increased with duration of follow-up with only one occurrence in the first 2 years (n = 71; 1.4%) but 17 occurrences (n = 63; 27%) among patients tested after 5+ years. Clonal evolution occurred among 10% of ZAP-70–negative and 42% of ZAP-70–positive patients at 5+ years (P = .008). Conclusion This clinical trial confirms prospectively that cytogenetic abnormalities detected by FISH can predict overall survival for CLL patients at the time of diagnosis, but also suggests that many patients acquire new abnormalities during the course of their disease. Patients with higher ZAP-70 expression may be more likely to experience such clonal evolution. These findings have important implications for both clinical management and trials of early treatment for patients with high-risk, early-stage CLL.

AbstractThe clinical efficacy of evaluating genetic anomalies in metaphase cells versus interphase nuclei for multiple myeloma (MM) is poorly understood. Therefore, survival for 154 patients with newly diagnosed untreated MM was compared with results from analysis of metaphase and interphase cells. Metaphases were studied by conventional cytogenetics and fluorescent-labeled DNA probes (fluorescence in situ hybridization [FISH]), whereas inter-phase nuclei were evaluated only by FISH. All FISH studies were done using DNA probes to detect t(4;14)(p16;q32), t(11;14)(q13;q32), t(14;16)(q32;q23), del(17) (p13.1), and chromosome 13 anomalies. Metaphases were abnormal by cytogenetics and/or metaphase FISH in 61 (40%) patients. Abnormal interphase nuclei were observed in 133 (86%) patients, including each patient with abnormal metaphases. FISH was a necessary adjunct to cytogenetics to detect t(4;14) and t(14;16) in metaphase cells. Patient survival was especially poor for patients with greater than 50% abnormal interphase nuclei, although this result was more likely due to level of plasma cells than specific chromosome anomalies. For metaphase data, patients with t(4;14), t(14;16), del(17) (p13.1), and/or chromosome 13 anomalies (primarily monosomy 13) had poor survival. A different outcome was observed for interphase data as patients with t(4;14) or t(14;16) had poor survival, whereas patients with chromosome 13 anomalies had intermediate survival: interphase FISH did not substitute for metaphase analysis.