Back to Authors

Shah, D

Mayo Clinic

Houston Methodist

Citations 1

Addressing recurrent pericarditis: assessing patient and professional education needs
Klein, A, Wang, T, Weber, B N, Abbate, A, Kohnstamm, S, Luis, S A, Cremer, P, Al-Kazaz, M, Shah, D, Wang, L, Sabet, Amin , Tadwalkar, R, Participants, A H A Addressing Recurrent Pericarditis Initiative, Staff, A H A Addressing Recurrent Pericarditis, Cremer, Paul , Cremer, Paul C , Klein, Allan L. , Wang, T, Weber, Brittany , Abbate, Antonio , Salik, Jonathan R. , Kohnstamm, Sarah, Luis, S A, Al‐Kazaz, Mohamed

European Heart Journal | February 4, 2026 | Volume: 46 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.4512 Get It

Abstract Background Nearly 40,000 people in the U.S. experience recurrent pericarditis with up to 90% of cases having no identifiable cause, often making the journey to diagnosis arduous. Understanding the challenges that patients and health care professionals (HCP) face will help address gaps and barriers in patient diagnosis and care. In addition, the lack of U.S. based guidelines for recurrent pericarditis clinical care, coupled with the time lapse from the last published European guideline, has created an opportunity to discover workflow solutions for U.S. based healthcare professionals. Purpose The American Heart Association’s (AHA) Addressing Recurrent Pericarditis Initiative is a three-year effort utilizing a quality improvement approach to address gaps/barriers in patient care, educate HCPs, and develop patient education resources to improve diagnosis, treatment, and quality of life. To accomplish this, the lived experiences and challenges patients face on their journey to diagnosis was integrated into the qualitative research process. Methods To assess quality improvement opportunities, the AHA engaged HCPs with recurrent pericarditis experience from 15 diverse health systems to participate in a learning collaborative strategy for quality improvement and implementation to share successful strategies, provide input on professional education topics, and participate in process mapping. Data collection strategies include 1:1 consultations, quarterly learning collaborative calls, surveys and questionnaire completion. To assess patient education needs, the AHA Market Research Team held 1-hour video interviews with ten diverse patients. Results AHA-led HCP interviews produced process maps of clinical workflows and identified opportunities for standardization to improve clinical workflow and patient outcomes (Figure 1). From these data collection methods, preliminary results include care coordination across clinical settings, exploring treatment options, standardization of follow-up cadence, and provider awareness of misdiagnoses/underdiagnosis rates. The patient interviews revealed that there is a lack of symptom recognition, persistent rate of misdiagnosis, delay in accurate diagnosis and treatment, and discrepancies in diagnosis and treatment for various demographics including female and younger adult patients (Figure 2). Conclusion(s) In Year 2 of this three-year initiative, we will continue to refine identified areas of opportunities to improve patient outcomes by creating and disseminating educational materials and launch awareness campaigns, while also producing a national education series for HCPs that provide guidance for system-level quality improvement to emphasize consistency in care and reductions in health inequities. Key findings from this study highlight the care coordination involved in the treatment of patients with recurrent pericarditis and the need to provide multidiscipline educational approaches to achieve this goal.Figure. 1 Summary of care pathway Figure. 2 Summary of patient interviews