Shelig, Mohamed

Abstract Objective This report describes the first use of the Affera Sphere-9 dual-energy catheter for slow pathway modification in atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in a patient with a dual-chamber pacemaker, illustrating a streamlined single-catheter approach. Case presentation A 74-year-old man with prior cryoablation for AF, mitral valve repair, and a recently implanted dual-chamber pacemaker was referred for repeat AF ablation due to symptomatic, recurrent AF (30% burden). Left atrial mapping with the Sphere-9 catheter revealed reconnection at the right superior pulmonary vein, right carina, and across prior roof and floor lines. Using pulsed field (4-s lesions, 8 mm spacing) and supplemental radiofrequency (RF) energy, the left atrial posterior wall was re-isolated. Cavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation was performed with RF and pulsed field applications, achieving bidirectional block. During subsequent testing, typical AVNRT was induced. To maximize efficiency, slow pathway modification was performed with the same Sphere-9 catheter, using shortened RF applications (3 s), a lower target temperature (60°C), and an 80% current limit, at an inferior-posterior site 1.3–2.5 cm from the His signal. Junctional acceleration was observed without atrioventricular block, indicating successful slow pathway modification. The procedure was completed without fluoroscopy or complications, and follow-up device interrogation showed no recurrence of AF or AVNRT. Conclusion This case demonstrates the feasibility and acute safety of using a single dual-energy lattice-tip catheter for combined AF and AVNRT ablation, potentially reducing procedure time, catheter exchanges, and cost; larger studies are needed to assess long-term outcomes.

Abstract Aims Heart failure (HF) continues to portend significant morbidity and mortality within the USA. Data regarding the efficacy of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains unclear. Finerenone, a non-steroidal MRA, has demonstrated reduction in hospitalizations in this population. However, the comparative efficacy of different MRA classes in these patients remains elusive. Methods and results We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study using the TriNetX research network. We applied 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) to compare patients with HFpEF initiated on finerenone vs. spironolactone. We examined 1-year risks of HF exacerbation, acute kidney injury (AKI), electrolyte derangements, and cardiovascular outcomes. We identified 254,417 patients with HFpEF and MRA use. After PSM, each cohort contained 491 patients. Analysis revealed that finerenone use was associated with a significantly lower risk of HF exacerbation (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.63 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54, 0.74], P < 0.001), all-cause mortality (HR = 0.38 [95% CI: 0.23, 0.64], P < 0.001), and hypokalaemia (HR = 0.58 [95% CI: 0.40, 0.85], P = 0.001). The aforementioned results, along with a reduction in AKI risk, were statistically significant after stratified subgroup analysis by diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. Conclusion In this large real-world HFpEF cohort, finerenone use was associated with lower risks of HF exacerbation and all-cause mortality compared with spironolactone. These observational findings are hypothesis-generating and warrant confirmation in randomized trials.