Trabattoni, Daniela

Background: In younger patients (<60 years) with cryptogenic stroke presumed to be patent foramen ovale (PFO)-related, the standard approach involves transcatheter PFO closure combined with antithrombotic therapy (ATA). However, due to their exclusion from randomized clinical trials, no formal recommendations exist for patients ≥60 years. This study investigates whether PFO closure benefits patients ≥60 years with prior cryptogenic stroke or if ATA remains the preferred option. Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect databases to obtain articles in all languages from January 2004 until July 2025. The primary outcome was a risk of recurrent stroke during follow-up and secondary outcomes were risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF), all-cause mortality and in-hospital complications. PROSPERO registration ID: CRD420250652870. Results: One post hoc evaluation of the DEFENSE-PFO trial and eleven observational studies were included. Compared to ATA, PFO closure was associated with a reduced risk of recurrent stroke (HR=0.60; 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.80, p<.001) and mortality (HR=0.41; 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.90, p=.02; I2 = 43.8%) with no difference in risk of new-onset AF (HR=1.13, 95%CI: 0.53 to 2.44, p=.74). When compared with patients <60 years, individuals ≥60 years had a higher risk of recurrent stroke (HR = 2.68; 95% CI 1.40–5.13; p=.002), new-onset AF (HR = 4.12; 95% CI 1.90–8.95; p<0.001) and mortality during follow-up (HR = 8.24; 95% CI 3.49–19.46; p<.0001). In-hospital complications after PFO closure were comparable between two age groups. Conclusion: While PFO closure may reduce ischemic stroke risk in older patients with cryptogenic stroke, this benefit is offset by higher absolute risks for recurrent stroke, new-onset AF, and mortality. Therefore, highly individualized patient selection and age-specific risk tools are crucial. Further long-term randomized trials are essential to optimize PFO closure in this population.