Ailawadhi, Sikander

Abstract Introduction: IRAKLIA is an international, open-label, non-inferiority (NI) trial (NCT05405166) investigating isatuximab (Isa) subcutaneous (SC) vs intravenous (IV) administration, plus pomalidomide-dexamethasone (Pd) and the first Phase 3 multiple myeloma (MM) trial using an on-body injector (OBI). IRAKLIA demonstrated NI in its co-primary endpoints: overall response rate (ORR) and steady state trough concentration (Ctrough; Cycle(C) 6 Day(D) 1 predose). IsaOBI offers hands-free administration of flat-dose Isa, a small, hidden, retractable needle to prevent sharps injury and low-pressure delivery. Here, we examine the effect of body weight (BW) on pharmacokinetics (PK) as well as efficacy and safety outcomes with flat-dose IsaOBI vs IV + Pd in IRAKLIA. Methods: Patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory MM ≥18 years (yr) with ≥1 prior line of therapy (LOT) were randomized 1:1 to IsaOBI (1400mg; n=263) or IV (10mg/kg; n=264 weekly in C1, then every 2 weeks + P (4mg/day, D1–21) + d (40mg [20mg if ≥75yr] weekly) in 4-week cycles. This analysis is run by BW (≤65kg, >65–≤85kg, >85kg) which was a stratification factor, and extreme BW (≤50kg, >50–≤100kg, >100kg). Results: Number of pts per BW group were: ≤50kg [OBI n=16, IV n=14], ≤65kg [OBI n=84, IV n=85], >65–≤85kg [OBI n=117, IV n=118], >85kg [OBI n=62, IV n=65], and >100kg [OBI n=22, IV n=22]. Baseline (BL) demographic and disease characteristics were generally balanced across BW groups for IsaOBI vs IV, including age (median 66yr) and prior LOT (median 2). However, in the >100kg group, more IsaOBI vs IV pts exhibited poor prognostic characteristics including plasmacytoma, International Staging System Stage II/III disease, beta 2-microglobulin level ≥5.5mg/L, estimated glomerular filtration rate <60mL/min/1.73m2 and a lower very good partial response (VGPR) rate as best overall response at last regimen. Flat-dose IsaOBI showed adequate exposure (C2D1 Ctrough) for all BW groups, with geometric mean ratios (90% CI) vs IV >1: ≤65kg (1.628 [1.294–2.048]), >65–≤85kg (1.303 [1.089–1.560]) and >85kg (1.006 [0.817–1.239]). IsaOBI ORRs were comparable to IV across BW: ≤65kg, 66% vs 71% (relative risk [RR]: 0.928), >65–≤85kg, 70% vs 70% (RR: 1.009), and >85kg, 81% vs 72% (RR: 1.115). For extreme BW groups, ORRs (95% CI) were similar between IsaOBI and IV for ≤50kg group [56% vs 60%] and for >50–≤100kg [72(66–78)% vs 70(63–76)%] but lower [68% vs 86%] in >100kg group. An exposure-response (E-R) analysis showed the impact of BW on response: IsaOBI pts ≤50kg tended to respond less vs IsaOBI pts >50kg despite correct exposure because they were confounded by BL disease characteristicsincluding a higher proportion of high-risk cytogenetics and plasma cells in the bone marrow vs other BW group pts. For IsaOBI and IV, Grade (Gr)≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and Gr≥3 treatment-related TEAEs decreased with increasing BW. They were similar between arms in ≤65kg group (OBI vs IV, Gr≥3 TEAEs: 87% vs 88%; Gr≥3 treatment-related TEAEs: 73% vs 77%). A similar trend was observed in extreme BW groups along with similar incidences between arms in ≤50kg group. While TE serious AEs (TESAEs) and treatment-related TESAEs decreased with increasing BW for IsaIV, incidence was stable in the IsaOBI arm. OBI arm OBI Gr5 TEAEs were similar between groups and arms, except for higher incidence in ≤65kg group (12% vs 5%) with OBI vs IV that was not reflected in ≤50 or >50–≤100kg groups. Treatment discontinuation rates for all drugs with IsaOBI vs IV were 14% vs 6% (≤65kg), 8% vs 10% (>65–≤85kg), and 2% vs 10% (>85kg). Similar incidence of Gr≥3 laboratory (lab) neutropenia was observed across BW in IsaOBI: 86.9% (≤65kg), 83.5% (>65–≤85kg) and 83.9% (>85kg). Higher rates of Gr≥3 lab neutropenia were observed in ≤50kg group (93.8%, IsaOBI vs 71.4%, IsaIV), which did not translate into higher rates of neutropenic complications (18.8% vs 14.3%). The E-R analysis revealed no relationship between Isa PK exposure and safety for OBI and IV arms. Conclusions: No notable impact from IsaOBI flat dosing was observed across BW groups. Flat-dose Isa OBI showed consistent safety and efficacy across different BW groups, with differences likely linked to BL disease characteristics according to the E-R analysis. The IsaOBI C2D1 Ctrough, a time-independent predictor of efficacy, was similar to, or higher vs IsaIV in each BW group, supportive of a flat dose providing adequate exposure without need for adjustment.

Abstract Introduction Cila-cel is associated with a 10-15% risk of delayed neurotoxicity (DNT) with rates of cranial nerve palsies (IEC-NP) and parkinsonism (IEC-PKS) seen at a rate of 10% and 1-4% respectively and can occur as early as 3-4 weeks after infusion. We and others have shown that high post-infusion peak absolute lymphocyte count (ALCpeak) of >3x10^9/L is associated with an increased risk of delayed neurotoxicity (Lim et al., ASCO 2025) whilst the risk was negligible (~1%) when ALCpeak fell below that threshold. Since December 2024, we implemented prophylactic administration of dexamethasone (PPX DEX) when ALC was >3x10^9/L (defined as high ALCpeak). Outcome of these patients are described here. Methods Analysis of clinical outcome included 230 pts treated between Feb 2022 and Nov 2024 as a historical cohort and 102 patients treated between Dec 2024 and May 2025 after the introduction of dexamethasone prophylaxis using an oral dose of 10mg twice a day for at least three days in the high ALCpeak cohort. Results No significant differences were seen between the new and historical cohort in pre-lymphodepletion disease burden (bone marrow plasma cell %, involved light chain or M-spike level), and rates of all/high-grade CRS or ICANS, IEC-HS and rates of tocilizumub use. Median follow-up in the new cohort of 102 pts was 3.6 months (95% CI 3.3-4.2). Eleven (10.8%) developed DNT [3 (2.9%) with IEC-PKS, 8 (7.8%) with IEC-NP]. High ALCpeak of >3x10^9/L was observed in 51 (50%) pts. Among pts with high ALCpeak, DNT was observed in 10 (20%) pts [3 (5.9%) with IEC-PKS, 7 (13.7%) with IEC-NP] whereas among 51 pts with ALCpeak <3x10^9/L, DNT was observed in 1 (2%) pt [1 (2%) with IEC-NP]. In the high ALCpeak cohort, 38 (75%) received DEX [6 (12%) for toxicity management, 32 (63%) PPX DEX]. Of the 38 pts treated with DEX, DNT was observed in 6 (16%) pts (2 (5.3%) IEC-PKS, 4 (10.5%) IEC-CNP). We next compared DNT rates between this new cohort of high ALCpeak pts receiving DEX (n=38) against the historical cohort with high ALCpeak (n=98). Estimated 90-day DNT by Kaplan-Meier method was (19.2% vs 20.5%; p=0.53): IEC-PKS (5.8% vs 7.2%; p=0.60) and IEC-NP (11.7% vs 13.3%; p=0.58). In patients with high ALCpeak, the use of DEX did not appear to significantly reduce the risk of DNT compared to historical controls (HR 0.76, 0.33-1.78), IEC-PKS (HR 0.67, 0.14-3.10) or IEC-NP (0.73, 0.24-2.23). We next compared ALC expansion over the first month post CAR-T infusion (area under the curve, AUC). Among the new cohort of 102 patients, no difference was seen in the AUC of pts who received DEX but did not develop DNT vs those who developed DNT (31.0 vs 57.9, p=0.28); No difference in AUC was seen in the new high ALCpeak cohort receiving DEX vs the historical cohort with high ALCpeak (36.0 vs 43.8, p=0.15) Of the eight cases of IEC-NP, 4 received PPX DEX. No noticeable differences were observed in the severity of presentation, laterality of cranial nerve involvement and rates of multiple cranial nerve involvement between these 4 cases who received PPX DEX and the 16 cases from the historical cohort. At the time of database freeze, 3 of the 4 cases had resolved and 1 was improving. Median time to complete symptom resolution was 38 days vs 69 days in the historical cohort. Of the three cases of IEC-PKS, 2 received PPX DEX. Median time to symptom onset for IEC-PKS was 46 days (vs. 24 days in historical cohort). Both cases had severe symptoms non-responsive to first line high-dose methylprednisolone, second line intrathecal chemotherapy and third line high-dose cyclophosphamide. Both pts subsequently died from sepsis 28 and 67 days post-cyclophosphamide. Conclusion While ALCpeak >3x10^9/L predicts risk of DNT in pts treated with cilta-cel, the use of PPX DEX does not appear to significantly reduce ALC expansion and does not appear to significantly reduce the risk of DNT, IEC-PKS or IEC-NP. Other strategies to reduce ALC or alter T cell functions may need to be considered.

Abstract Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is the only curative option for myelofibrosis (MF) but carries significant non-relapse mortality (NRM). Splenomegaly in MF patients undergoing allo-HCT is linked to delayed engraftment, poor graft function, and worse overall survival (OS). Strategies to reduce spleen size pre-HCT have been explored. Splenic irradiation (SI) offers a non-invasive approach for rapid spleen size reduction, though data on transplant outcomes are limited. Retrospective studies suggest SI just before HCT may reduce relapse and effectively shrink spleens with acceptable toxicity. Methods: We conducted a single-center observational study on MF patients with splenomegaly undergoing allo-HCT between 2022–2024. SI (100 cGy in 5 fractions) was delivered within 6 weeks pre-HCT. Primary endpoints: engraftment kinetics (including primary engraftment failure), time to neutrophil/platelet engraftment, and transfusion independence. Secondary endpoints: OS, progression-free survival (PFS), relapse, NRM, and rates of acute/chronic GVHD. Kaplan–Meier methods were used for OS/PFS; cumulative incidence functions with competing risks were used for relapse/NRM. Results: Thirteen patients were analyzed. Median age was 63 (range 40–74) years, and 54% were male. Eight (62%) patients had primary MF, 3 (23%) post-essential thrombocytosis, and 2 (17%) post-polycythemia vera. Eleven (94.6%) patients had prior Ruxolitinib therapy, and 10 (76.9%) harbored a JAK2 mutation with a median variant allele frequency of 51% (range 34%–94%). DIPSS risk at transplant was low in 1 (7.7%), intermediate-1 in 8 (61.5%), and intermediate-2 in 4 (30.8%) patients. Median pretransplant spleen size was 22.4 (range 14.5–28) cm. Two patients had a history of thrombosis, including 1 with portal vein thrombosis. The median interval between SI and stem cell infusion was 14 (range 10–43) days. The median HCT-CI score was 2 (range 0–6), and the median KPS was 80% (range 80–100%). Most patients (76.9%) received a HLA-matched unrelated donor transplantation, while 3 (23.1%) received haploidentical donor grafts. All grafts used peripheral blood stem cells. Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) was used in 11 (84.6%) patients, while 2 (15.4%) received myeloablative conditioning (MAC). Five (38.5%) patients received total body irradiation (TBI) as part of conditioning, with all receiving a TBI dose of 200 cGy. All patients received post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based GVHD prophylaxis. With a median follow-up of 17.1 months, median neutrophil engraftment occurred at 18 (range 14–45) days, platelet engraftment at 30 (range 15–434) days, red blood cell transfusion independence at 35 (range 11–341) days, and platelet transfusion independence at 24 (range 10–312) days. Median hospital stay was 26 (range 14–86) days. Primary engraftment failure occurred in 1 (8.3%) patient. One (7.7%) patient developed veno-occlusive disease. Four (33.3%) patients experienced CMV reactivation, and 3 developed CMV disease requiring systemic therapy. Median post-transplant spleen size was 16.6 (range 12.2–25.2) cm, and 30% of patients achieved >50% spleen size reduction, with a median time of 114 (range 45–212) days, with none having a normal spleen at day 30 post-transplant but 2 (15%) patients having a normal spleen at day 100 post-transplant. At 1 year, OS was 73.3% (95%CI, 51.5–100%), and PFS was 66% (95%CI, 44%–100%). The 1-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 7.6%, while 1-year NRM was 25.7%. Seven (53%) patients developed acute GVHD, with 1 patient experiencing grade III acute GVHD that progressed to sepsis and death at day 248 post-transplant. Two additional deaths occurred (graft failure=1, multiorgan failure=1). Two (15%) patients developed moderate chronic GVHD Conclusion: In this single-center cohort, SI pre-allo-HCT was feasible, tolerated, and associated with promising OS and PFS. Engraftment occurred in >90%, with one case of primary engraftment failure and most achieving transfusion independence within reasonable time frames. SI reduced spleen size in >30%, though acute GVHD was frequent. It remains uncertain whether the incidence and severity of GVHD may be influenced using TBI as part of the conditioning regimen (albeit reduced in intensity) in addition to splenic irradiation. Larger prospective studies are needed to clarify SI's impact on engraftment, transfusion dependence, GVHD, and outcomes in MF patients.

Abstract Background People of color (POC) and patients (pts) from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds often face financial, geographic, and systemic barriers, limiting access to advanced treatments (Tx). A survey was conducted to better understand how race and socioeconomic factors affect pt awareness of and access to bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies in the US. Methods This study used 30-minute online surveys (March-June 2024) of 1301 pts with RRMM across 7 countries. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and χ2 tests, with P<.01 for all comparisons unless specified; these are presented for the 305 US pts. Results The 305 US pts identified as White (n=227) or POC (n=78), which included Black/African American (n=42); Hispanic/Latino (n=24); and Asian, Pacific Islander, or Arab (n=12). Pts self-reported as having easy/very easy (n=92), neutral (n=117), or difficult/very difficult (n=96) financial burden, being employed (n=142) or not employed (n=163), and having ≤secondary (n=72) or >secondary education (n=232). In the US, more POC reported difficult/very difficult financial circumstances than White pts (47% v 26%). Fewer POC stated they were in remission (28% v 49%) or had consulted an MM specialist (41% v 59%, P=.028), even after adjusting for self-reported good financial circumstances. Among pts with neutral-very easy financial situations, stated remission rates were still lower for POC (n=41) v White pts (n=168) (34% v 59%, P=.026), as were MM specialist visits (41% v 66%, P=.022). Pts with >secondary education (n=232) and those who were employed (n=142) had higher stated remission rates than those with ≤secondary education (n=72) and those who were not employed (n=163) (47% v 32%, P=.025 and 66% v 24%, respectively). Physical burden was experienced by more POC v White pts (91% v 66%), even after adjusting for financial circumstances (90% v 65%, P=.011, for POC v White pts in neutral/very easy financial circumstances). POC and pts with difficult financial circumstances (including POC and White pts) perceived their Tx as less effective than expected across several measures, including emotional and mental health, overall impact on daily life, side effects, Tx costs, and the effect of Tx schedule on everyday life. Awareness of BsAbs and CAR-T was lower among POC v White pts (BsAb: 49% v 77%; CAR-T: 67% v 81%, P=.032), pts who were not employed v employed (BsAb: 63% v 77%, P=.015; CAR-T: 74% v 81%, P=.046), pts with ≤secondary v >secondary education (CAR-T only: 75% v 78%, P=.021), and those in difficult/very difficult v easy/very easy financial circumstances (BsAb: 54% v 90%; CAR-T: 64% v 90%). Among pts aware of BsAbs, 18% (n=39) reported that the Tx was offered by their physician. More employed v not employed pts were offered BsAbs (26% v 10%). There were non-statistically significant differences in the proportion offered BsAbs based on race (POC 8% v White pts 21%, P=.065), financial status (difficult/very difficult 15% v easy/very easy 23%, P=.288), or level of education (≤secondary education 15% v >secondary education 20%, P=.428). Among pts aware of CAR-T, 24% (n=56) reported that the Tx was offered by their physician. Fewer POC than White pts were offered CAR-T (6% v 29%), even after adjusting for financial status (10% v 32%, P=.04 for pts with good finances). Among those aware of CAR-T, fewer pts not employed v employed (12% v 37%), pts with ≤secondary v >secondary education (11% v 27%, P=.015), and pts with financial burden (difficult/very difficult 10% v easy/very easy 31%) were offered CAR-T. Overall, fewer POC received CAR-T than White pts (1.3% v 10.7%, P=.03). Additionally, more employed v not employed pts received CAR-T (15.2% v 2.5%) or BsAbs (23.5% v 4.4%). Conclusions Consistent with existing health equity inequalities (Chen et al, Int J Equity Health, 2025), POC and pts in poorer socioeconomic circumstances had less awareness of and access to BsAbs and CAR-T. To address these disparities, partnering with trusted messengers and pt advocacy groups supporting Black, Hispanic, and Asian pts and those with socioeconomic hardships can enhance healthcare infrastructure, support initiatives to help pts navigate advanced Tx options, and develop pt- and physician-targeted education. These strategies can improve awareness and promote Tx equity, ultimately ensuring that all pts with MM receive optimal care regardless of their socioeconomic status and race.

Abstract Introduction: CLL disease control and survival outcomes have improved since the introduction of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis). Since CLL often requires treatments, understanding patient preferences is critical in optimizing adherence and overall satisfaction. However, there are limited published data on how Korean patients prioritize treatment efficacy, safety and the convenience of administration. To address this gap, a discrete choice experiment (DCE) methodology was applied in a comprehensive quantitative analysis to evaluate patient preferences for BTKi treatment attributes among patients with CLL in Korea. Methods: Adult patients (≥18 years of age) with a confirmed diagnosis of CLL in Korea were recruited by The Korea Blood Disease & Cancer Association to participate in an online DCE survey questionnaire from April 30, 2025 to May 22, 2025. Treatment attributes and levels were identified based on published literature and clinical inputs. Efficacy attributes included progression-free survival (PFS); safety attributes included impacts of adverse events (AEs), including diarrhea, headache, atrial fibrillation and hypertension, on quality of life (QoL); convenience attributes included formulation type (including tablet or capsule) and dosing frequency (including once daily or twice daily). Preference data was analyzed using a conditional logistic regression. Relative importance of BTKi treatment attributes were calculated to measure the importance of each attribute in treatment decision-making. Additionally, subgroup analyses were conducted among patients aged <60 years and ≥60 years, those who received 2 or more lines (2L+) of treatments, and those who experienced AEs from CLL treatment. Results: A total of 57 patients completed the survey. The mean age was 61 years, with 46% aged <60 years and 54% aged ≥60 years. Female patients comprise 35% of the sample. Around 33% had a high school education or less, and 23% were employed full-time. More than half (54%) reported no comorbid conditions, and 70% were diagnosed ≥5 years ago (26% diagnosed 1 to <5 years ago; 4% diagnosed less than a year ago). In terms of treatment experience, 11% were treatment naive, while 89% received ≥1 treatment (61% first-line, 21% second-line and 7% third-line or later). In the context of CLL treatment preferences, patients showed a significant preference (P < .05) for therapies that minimized the impact of AEs on QoL, offered longer PFS, and required less frequent dosing. Formulation type did not have a statistically significant impact on treatment choice. Overall, patients placed greater importance on how treatment-related attributes affect their QoL and dosing frequency. The highest-ranked factors were the impact of headache (22%) and diarrhea (21%) on QoL, followed by dosing frequency (19%), the impact of atrial fibrillation (16%) and hypertension (14%) on QoL, PFS (7%), and formulation type (0.6%). Results from the subgroup analyses were generally consistent with the full sample analysis, with impacts of AEs on QoL being the most important factors for treatment decision-making, especially among older patients, although the relative ranking of impacts of AEs varied by age groups and treatment experience. Regarding efficacy, younger patients (<60 years of age) valued PFS slightly more than older patients (≥60 years of age), ranking it 4th and 6th out of the 10 attributes, respectively. Additionally, preference on dosing frequency was more important for 2L+ patients, reflecting the treatment burden experienced from previous regimens. Conclusions: This study provides valuable insights into the treatment preferences of Korean patients with CLL, highlighting the importance of QoL considerations for treatment decision-making. Among the evaluated attributes, patients placed the greatest weight on minimizing the impacts of AEs, particularly headache and diarrhea, on daily functioning, followed by dosing frequency. These preferences underscore the need for patient-centered care that prioritizes not only clinical efficacy but also tolerability and convenience. These insights can inform shared decision-making and support the development of personalized treatment strategies that better align with patient needs and expectations in Korea.

Abstract Background and Significance: Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia (WM) is an indolent B cell disorder characterized by proliferation of clonal lymphoplasmacytic lymphocytes in the bone marrow, lymph nodes, as well as liver and spleen, and secreting a monoclonal IgM Protein. WM is a rare disorder with about 1,700 cases diagnosed in the U.S. each year. There have been significant advances in the management of patients with WM in the last decade, with Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors (ibrutinib and zanubrutinib) emerging as a major treatment advancement in this disease. Currently, both BTK inhibitors are approved for the treatment of WM patients with newly diagnosed as well as relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease. BTK inhibitors are effective for the therapy of WM, especially among patients with MYD88 mutation, although the response rates are lower in patients with CXCR4 mutations. In addition, these drugs can cause cardiac side effects such as atrial and ventricular arrhythmias as well as an increased risk of bleeding/bruising. Thus, these drugs can be difficult to use in patients who are older and have cardiac comorbidities. BCL-2 overexpression is well described in a number of B cell malignancies, including WM, leading to inhibition of apoptosis of malignant cells. BCL-2 inhibition with venetoclax has been tested in patients with R/R WM and showed excellent activity with an overall response rate (ORR) of 85% and very good partial response (VGPR) rate of 19%. The therapy was overall well tolerated with no evidence of cardiac toxicity. Given the excellent activity and tolerability of Venetoclax in WM, we are conducting a national cooperative group randomized phase 2 trial comparing ibrutinib+rituximab (IR) vs. venetoclax+rituximab (VR) in patients with newly diagnosed WM. Our hypothesis is that with this trial, we have the potential to develop a more effective therapy targeting BCL-2 for patients with untreated WM, that does not have cardiac or hemostatic toxicity. In addition, we are testing use of a fixed duration therapy with these regimens. Study design and methods: The ongoing clinical trial () is being conducted through the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) and is enrolling at multiple SWOG, ECOG, and ALLIANCE centers throughout the US. Major inclusion criteria include 1) newly diagnosed WM confirmed by biopsy and measurable disease (≥0.5 g/dl IgM type paraprotein), 2) meeting WM-related clinical criteria to initiate therapy (cytopenias, B symptoms, bulky lymphadenopathy, neuropathy, hyperviscosity) 3) adequate blood counts (ANC >1000, HGB ≥7.5, PLT ≥50,000), 4) eGFR ≥30 ml/min, 5) adequate liver function tests (total bilirubin ≤1.5 x ULN and AST, ALT and alkaline phosphatase ≤3 x ULN), 6) Zubrod performance status ≤2, 7)prior treatment with single-agent R allowed as long as >6 months prior to registration. Once enrolled the patients will be randomized 1:1 to IR vs. VR. I will be started at 420 mg daily at start of therapy while V will be given at 400mg daily during cycle 1 week 1 and then increased to 800 mg daily from cycle 1 day 8 onwards. R will be given weekly x 4 in cycles 2 and 5. Dose adjustments for both I and V can be done depending on toxicity. Therapy will be given for 2 years and then the patients will be observed off treatment. Patients with disease progression during these 2 years of therapy can cross-over to the other arm. The primary endpoint of the study is rate of VGPR or better. With 41 eligible participants per arm (total N=82), this design has 80% power to reject the null hypothesis of a 25% VGPR rate, given the alternative of a 50% VGPR rate, with a one-sided alpha of 10%. To account for an anticipated 10% ineligibility rate, approximately 46 participants will be accrued per arm (92 total). Current enrollment stands at 15 patients. The secondary end points include ORR, complete response rate, major response rate, progression free and overall survival rates.

Abstract Background: Intravenous (IV) isatuximab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Isa-Pd) is approved for treatment in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) based on the ICARIA-MM study. Subcutaneous (SC) administration of Isa offers potential advantages such as shorter administration duration and greater patient comfort compared with IV routes. Isa SC via an on-body injector (OBI), an investigational wearable bolus injector, demonstrated safety and efficacy in a Phase 1b study in patients with RRMM. The IRAKLIA trial (NCT05405166) was the first Phase 3 trial evaluating the non-inferiority of Isa-Pd SC via an OBI vs Isa-Pd IV in patients with RRMM. Here, we report the findings of the IRAKLIA trial in the East Asian subgroup with RRMM. Methods: This global, multicenter, open-label study enrolledpatients aged ≥18 years with RRMM who had received ≥1 prior line of therapy (LOT) including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor (PI). Patients were randomized 1:1 to Isa SC (1400 mg) or Isa IV (10 mg/kg) weekly in Cycle (C)1, then every 2 weeks in addition to P (4 mg orally daily, Day [D]1-21) and d (40 mg orally [20 mg if age ≥75 years] weekly). Treatment was administered in 4-week cycles and continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient withdrawal. Co-primary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and observed Isa concentration before dosing (Ctrough) at steady state (predose at C6D1). Key secondary endpoints included rate of very good partial response or better (≥VGPR), Ctroughlevel Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1), infusion reaction incidence, and patient satisfaction rate based on the patient experience and satisfaction questionnaire (PESQ) at C5D15. Results: The East Asian subgroup consisted of 105 patients from China (Mainland, n=82 and Taiwan, n=1) and Japan(n=22) (SC, n=50; IV, n=55). Baseline characteristics of the East Asian subgroup were generally balanced between the two arms and generally comparable to the overall global population (median age 62 years; median 2 prior LOT; 29.5% high-risk cytogenetics; 82.9% refractory to lenalidomide; 7.6% prior exposure to daratumumab). After a median of 13.0 months follow-up, ORR in the SC and IV arm was 74.0% and 70.9%, respectively (relative risk [95% CI] = 1.044 [0.815 – 1.335]). The mean (SD) of Ctroughat C6D1 was 502 (232) µg/mL for SC arm and 282 (123) µg/mL for IV arm. The geometric mean ratio (90% CI) comparing SC to IV for Ctrough at steady state was 1.756 (1.346 – 2.290). The ≥VGPR rates were 58.0% for SC and 50.9% for IV (relative risk [95% CI] = 1.139 [0.798 – 1.631]). The mean(SD) of C2D1 Ctroughlevel was 420 (161) µg/mL for the SC arm and 262 (111) µg/mL for IV arm. The geometric mean ratio (90% CI) comparing SC to IV for Ctrough at C2D1 was 1.673 (1.321 to 2.120). The infusion reaction incidence was 0% and 21.8% for SC and IV, respectively. Grade ≥3treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in 82.0% and 87.3% of patients in the SC and IV arms, respectively. Treatment discontinuation rates were 6% for the SC arm and 12.7% for the IV arm. Injection site reactions (ISRs) occurred in 4% (2/50) of patients in the SC arm and in 0.21% (2/964) of SC injections (all Grade 1), with 99.3% of SC injections completed successfully. Isa SC patients expressed higher satisfaction with their injection method, with 64.0% of patients reporting “satisfied” or “very satisfied” vs 52.7% of Isa IV patients (odds ratio [95% CI] = 1.594 [0.728 – 3.489]). Conclusions: The efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic results between Isa SC vs IV + Pd in the East Asian population from the IRAKLIA study were consistent with the results of the overall global population, in which non-inferiority of ORR, Ctrough at C6D1, ≥VGPR and Ctrough at C2D1 was demonstrated and statistically significantly fewer infusion reactions and higher patient satisfaction were also noted for SC vs IV. These results support the potential use of Isa SC delivered via OBI in East Asian patients and demonstrate the potential of this delivery method to improve patient experience and practice efficiency.

Abstract Purpose: R,R-1,2 cyclohexanediamine-pyrophosphato-platinum(II) (PT-112) is a novel immunogenic cell death–inducing small molecule under phase II development in several cancer types. It inhibits ribosome biogenesis and causes organelle stresses, leading to selective immunogenic cell death in cancer cells. The possibility of PT-112’s pyrophosphate moiety driving high drug concentrations to bone sites of disease has led to an interest in PT-112’s use in multiple myeloma. In this study, we present findings from phase I and in vivo studies for PT-112 in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Experimental Design: PT-112 biodistribution was analyzed in mice via laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The activity of PT-112 was assessed in de novo and transplantable Tg(Igkv3-5*-MYC)#Plbe (Vk*MYC) multiple myeloma mouse models as monotherapy or combination therapies. M-spike levels and survival were measured. A phase I dose escalation study of PT-112 monotherapy was conducted using a 3 + 3 design in patients with heavily pretreated relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma with exhausted available therapies. Results: In vivo biodistribution imaging revealed high concentrations in the bone, kidney, lung, skin, and liver. PT-112 was active in Vk*MYC multiple myeloma mouse models, both alone and in combination. Phase I data showed that PT-112 monotherapy was safe and well-tolerated, establishing a recommended phase II dose of 360 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Confirmed responses and other signals of activity were observed. Conclusions: These results suggest a lack of cross-resistance with the standard of care and support the translational value of the Vk*MYC model system. Further clinical investigation of PT-112 is warranted in multiple myeloma.

CLL is the most prevalent adult leukemia in Western countries, characterized by the accumulation of monoclonal B lymphocytes. Over the past decade, the therapeutic landscape for CLL has undergone significant transformations, primarily due to the introduction of targeted small molecular therapies like BTK inhibitors and BCL-2 inhibitors, that have improved patient outcomes drastically. Despite significant advances, long-term disease management remains challenging for patients with double-refractory CLL, where responses with subsequent therapies are short-lived. Resistance to these therapies can arise through several mechanisms like kinase-altering BTK mutations, alterations in the BCL-2 pathway, and adaptations within the tumor microenvironment, necessitating the exploration of new therapeutic options. This review provides an in-depth overview of the promising novel treatment approaches under investigation in CLL, focusing on advanced cellular therapies (CAR T-cell therapy), T-cell engagers, new monoclonal antibodies, and various next-generation small molecule inhibitors including BTK degraders, PI3K inhibitors, MALT1 inhibitors, c-MYC inhibitors, CDK9 inhibitors, and agents targeting angiogenesis and DNA damage repair. In this review, we will discuss the novel therapeutic targets and agents as well as ongoing trials, emphasizing the potential of these treatments to overcome resistance and meet the unmet needs of patients, particularly those with double-refractory CLL.