Yorkgitis, Brian K.

Background Traumatic injury is the fourth leading cause of death nationally; rural residents are twice as likely to die from injury as urban counterparts. On-scene mortality coverage gaps across regional trauma systems remain poorly characterized. Objective To identify geographic blind spots and time-critical, spatially advantageous on-scene deaths (2019-2023) that fall outside modeled 10-minute drive-time service areas across seven North Central state trauma regions. Methods This retrospective analysis geocoded death certificate records to ZIP Code Tabulation Areas and modeled 10-minute drive-time service areas in ArcGIS Online. EMS agency headquarters and staffing classification (volunteer, mixed, paid) were obtained from the DHS EMS Service Map. Candidate sites were identified by maximizing coverage of weighted, uncovered death centroids per region. Results Of 11,868 decedents (60.7% male; mean age 64.4 years [SD 25.6]; 49.9% fall, 26.4% firearm), 7815 had geocodable addresses. Coverage ranged from 53.5% (Western) to 87.0% (North Central); 5492 (70.3%) fell within a 10-minute service area. One candidate site per region could extend modeled coverage to 4-321 additional death locations (480 combined). Volunteer-dominant regions, where 63% of agencies reported scheduling gaps, had the lowest coverage, suggesting headquarters presence overstates availability. Conclusion Geospatial analysis identified actionable blind spots where one additional EMS resource per region could extend modeled coverage to hundreds of death locations. Because these are modeled coverage gains, not demonstrated mortality reductions, and depend in volunteer-dominant regions on staffing reliability that placement alone cannot resolve, the identified locations warrant further evaluation, not presumed survival benefit.

Background In pediatric patients presenting after blunt trauma, the incidence of clinically significant cervical spine injury (CSI) is approximately 1%. Although multidetector CT (MDCT) is widely accepted for cervical spine clearance in adults, its utility in children remains uncertain. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the sensitivity of MDCT in identifying clinically significant CSI in pediatric patients, stratified by age groups: adolescents (12 years to 17 years) and children (0 years to 11 years). Methods We designed a national, multicenter, prospective observational study to assess the diagnostic performance of MDCT in detecting clinically significant CSI in pediatric trauma patients. Data are being collected from participating centers on imaging findings, clinical outcomes, and the presence of confirmed CSIs after blunt trauma. The analysis plan includes stratification by age group and calculation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of MDCT for CSI. Results This abstract outlines the background, methodology, and analytical framework of the study. Data collection and analysis are ongoing. This study represents the largest known cohort of pediatric patients undergoing cervical spine imaging after blunt trauma and is the first prospective study of its kind focused exclusively on this population. Conclusions This study will provide critical data to inform guidelines for pediatric cervical spine clearance after blunt trauma. By evaluating the sensitivity of MDCT in detecting clinically significant CSI, the findings aim to support evidence-based imaging strategies and improve the safety and efficiency of pediatric trauma care.