Egan, Jan B.

11571 Background: Relapsed/refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) have a poor prognosis with limited treatment options. Our expanding knowledge of molecular alterations seen in R/R NHL allows identification of patients that potentially may benefit from a precision medicine approach. However, experience in routine clinical implementation of precision medicine has been limited. Here, we summarize our clinical experience in molecular characterization of RR NHL targeted therapy (TT) using next-generation sequencing (NGS), and selection of targeted therapy (TT) based on molecular profile. Methods: We conducted a prospective study in RR NHL through the Center for Individualized Medicine at Mayo Clinic. Consenting patients underwent NGS using FoundationOne Heme panel from biopsies done at time of relapse. Results of NGS were discussed at the Genomic Tumor Board and recommendations for TT were given based on matching specific molecular alteration(s) with potential agent(s) predicted to be active based on NGS. The agents could include FDA-approved, off-label use and clinical trial therapies. Results: 28 cases were enrolled: 18 aggressive NHL, 10 follicular lymphoma (FL). Molecular alterations were present in all cases. In aggressive B-cell NHL, CDKN2A/B gene cluster alterations were seen in 73% (8/11), while seen in only 1/7 T-cell lymphomas (TCL), and 1/10 FL. TP53 deletions were second most common genomic alterations in DLBCL (57%) and seen in 40% FL. JAK-STAT and ERBB pathways were altered in TCL (2/7 each). IGH-BCl-2 gene rearrangement were common in FL (70%), followed by MLL gene alterations (50%). Targetable mutations were present in 86% (24/28) of cases. A TT was recommended in all 24 cases, but received by 2 patients only. Remaining patients did not due to benefit from current therapy (10/24), ineligibility or lack of clinical trial (7/24) or interim clinical deterioration (5/24). Conclusions: Targetable mutations were identified in most cases of RR NHL with TT recommended for all cases. However, access to TT limits potential clinical benefit of molecular-based matching strategy. More studies are needed to assess impact on clinical outcomes.

About 15% of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (ICCs) express constitutively active fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) fusion proteins (FFs) generated by chromosomal translocations. FFs have been nominated as oncogenic drivers because administration of FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (F‐TKIs) can elicit meaningful objective clinical responses in patients carrying FF‐positive ICC. Thus, optimization of FF targeting is a pressing clinical need. Herein, we report that three different FFs, previously isolated from ICC samples, are heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) clients and undergo rapid degradation upon HSP90 pharmacological blockade by the clinically advanced HSP90 inhibitor ganetespib. Combining catalytic suppression by the F‐TKI BGJ398 with HSP90 blockade by ganetespib suppressed FGFR2‐TACC3 (transforming acidic coiled‐coil containing protein 3) signaling in cultured cells more effectively than either BGJ398 or ganetespib in isolation. The BGJ398 + ganetespib combo was also superior to single agents when tested in mice carrying subcutaneous tumors generated by transplantation of FGFR2‐TACC3 NIH3T3 transformants. Of note, FF mutants known to enforce clinical resistance to BGJ398 in ICC patients retained full sensitivity to ganetespib in cultured cells. Conclusion: Our data provide a proof of principle that upfront treatment with the BGJ398 + ganetespib combo improves therapeutic targeting of FGFR2 fusions in an experimental setting, which may be relevant to precision medicine approaches to FF‐driven ICC.

Objective: Bringing together genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and other –omics technologies is an important step towards developing highly personalized medicine. However, instrumentation has advances far beyond expectations and now we are able to generate data faster than it can be interpreted. Materials and Methods: We have developed PANDA ( P athway AND A nnotation) Explorer, a visualization tool that integrates gene-level annotation in the context of biological pathways to help interpret complex data from disparate sources. PANDA is a web-based application that displays data in the context of well-studied pathways like KEGG, BioCarta, and PharmGKB. PANDA represents data/annotations as icons in the graph while maintaining the other data elements (i.e. other columns for the table of annotations). Custom pathways from underrepresented diseases can be imported when existing data sources are inadequate. PANDA also allows sharing annotations among collaborators. Results : In our first use case, we show how easy it is to view supplemental data from a manuscript in the context of a user’s own data. Another use-case is provided describing how PANDA was leveraged to design a treatment strategy from the somatic variants found in the tumor of a patient with metastatic sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma. Conclusion : PANDA facilitates the interpretation of gene-centric annotations by visually integrating this information with context of biological pathways. The application can be downloaded or used directly from our website http://bioinformaticstools.mayo.edu/research/panda-viewer/.

463 Background: The genomic assessment of cancer has been revolutionized by next-generation sequencing and is increasingly being applied in the clinic to guide therapeutic decision-making. Time to reporting of results, specimen quantity, and analyte quality have constrained initial clinical applications to gene panels and whole exome based strategies. Methods: Patients underwent surgical resection, excisional or core biopsies, or bone marrow biopsy. Samples were analyzed by whole genome or exome sequencing and RNA sequencing, bioinformatics analysis, and therapeutic target prioritization by a multi-disciplinary Clinical Genomics Board. All prioritized targets were CLIA validated using Sanger sequencing, RT-qPCR, FISH, or IHC as appropriate. Treatment was delivered using off-label FDA approved drugs, clinical trials, or single patient INDs. Results: We have enrolled 40 patients with advanced, treatment-refractory cancers of whom sequencing data is available on 33. The initial 6 patients were evaluated in a non-CLIA pilot phase and 27 in the CLIA enabled phase. Upon availability of the initial report, identified targets of putative therapeutic relevance were then prioritized by the CGB in 22/27 patients (81%) for subsequent CLIA validation. Eleven patients have been treated with genomically selected therapy with partial response in 3/10 assessed patients. A testicular cancer patient had aberrations in two testes specific genes, a copy number gain in TSSK6 and a novel gene fusion between thyroid hormone receptor associated protein 3 (THRAP3) and Tektin 2 (TEKT2). Additionally, a case of papillary renal cell carcinoma had an amplification of YAP1 and a previously unreported P287T mutation in CCND1, suggesting potential benefit with a CDK4/6 inhibitor. Treatment is ongoing and results will be reported. Conclusions: Integrated whole genome analysis in a CLIA setting is feasible. Integration of SNV, copy number and transcriptional data may allow for selection of putative driver genes to enhance targeted therapy decisions. Barriers for future broader implementation include the need for reduced time from biopsy to report and availability of therapies.

Abstract Background: Genomic assessment of cancer has been revolutionized by Next-Generation sequencing and is increasingly being applied to guide clinical prognostic and therapeutic decision-making. Initial clinical applications have been limited to gene panels and whole exome based strategies due to challenges with time to reporting of results, specimen quantity, analyte quality, and ethical-legal-social issues (ELSI). Methods: Excisional or core tumor biopsies or bone marrow biopsies were obtained from consenting participants. Nucleic acid was extracted from fresh or frozen samples followed by WGS/WES/RNASeq on the Illumina HiSeq2000 or HiSeq2500 and bioinformatics analysis. Therapeutic targets were then prioritized by a multi-disciplinary Genomic Tumor Board (GTB) and CLIA validated using Sanger sequencing, RT-qPCR, FISH and/or IHC. Treatment was delivered using on/off-label FDA approved drugs, available clinical trials and single patient INDs. Results: We consented 64 and enrolled 35 patients with advanced, treatment-refractory cancers. Median age was 59 (range 27-91) with 62% male. The majority had ECOG scores of 1 (94%). A median of 79 (range 28-8891) potentially functional somatic point mutations were identified in each case. One to two mutations/case were further identified as therapeutically targetable in 60% of the cases. The median time from tissue acquisition to CLIA validated results was 116 days (range 42-282) with CLIA validation of targets achieved in 21 of 22 patients. Genomic, target directed treatment was ultimately instituted in 13 patients utilizing: on/off label FDA approved drugs (n = 9), clinical trial (n = 3) and single patient IND (n = 1). Preliminary clinical efficacy was noted in 5 patients (2 PR, 3 SD). Integration of WES, long-insert WGS and RNA-Seq identified a case with an ERRFI1 mutant allele present in only 11% of the DNA reads while 82% of the RNA-Seq reads had the mutant transcript. The patient was treated with erlotinib and achieved a partial response by RECIST criteria. In another case, a fusion between FGFR2-MGEA5 was observed in WES and RNA-Seq data leading to prioritization as a drug target. Reasons for patients not receiving targeted therapy included: inability to access treatment (n = 1), death prior to intended treatment (n = 3), results returned after death (n = 3), no targets identified (n = 2) and decision to pursue alternate therapy (n = 5). Conclusions: Integrating whole genome analysis in a CLIA setting is not only feasible, but also valuable, in the prioritization and selection of potential targeted therapies for patients with advanced tumors. Continued barriers to broad application include the need for shorter time to reporting as well as broad availability of therapies through basket studies. Citation Format: Mitesh J. Borad, Jan Egan, Mia Champion, Katherine Hunt, Robert McWilliams, Ann McCullough, Jessica Aldrich, Sara Nasser, Winnie Liang, Michael Barrett, David Craig, Ramesh Ramanathan, John Carpten, A. Keith Stewart, Alan Bryce. Implementation of CLIA enabled integrated whole genome (WGS)/exome (WES)/transcriptome (RNAseq) next-gen sequencing to identify therapeutically relevant targets in advanced cancer patients. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr CT112. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-CT112

Abstract Purpose: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma confined to the central nervous system. Whether there is a PCNSL-specific genomic signature and, if so, how it differs from systemic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is uncertain. Experimental Design: We performed a comprehensive genomic study of tumor samples from 19 immunocompetent PCNSL patients. Testing comprised array-comparative genomic hybridization and whole exome sequencing. Results: Biallelic inactivation of TOX and PRKCD was recurrently found in PCNSL but not in systemic DLBCL, suggesting a specific role in PCNSL pathogenesis. In addition, we found a high prevalence of MYD88 mutations (79%) and CDKN2A biallelic loss (60%). Several genes recurrently affected in PCNSL were common with systemic DLBCL, including loss of TNFAIP3, PRDM1, GNA13, TMEM30A, TBL1XR1, B2M, CD58, activating mutations of CD79B, CARD11, and translocations IgH-BCL6. Overall, B-cell receptor/Toll-like receptor/NF-κB pathways were altered in >90% of PNCSL, highlighting its value for targeted therapeutic approaches. Furthermore, integrated analysis showed enrichment of pathways associated with immune response, proliferation, apoptosis, and lymphocyte differentiation. Conclusions: In summary, genome-wide analysis uncovered novel recurrent alterations, including TOX and PRKCD, helping to differentiate PCNSL from systemic DLBCL and related lymphomas. Clin Cancer Res; 21(17); 3986–94. ©2015 AACR.

Abstract Background: Whole genome/exome/RNA sequencing has revolutionized the ability to assess the genomic landscape of cancer and is increasingly being utilized for clinical decision-making. Initial clinical applications have been constrained by specimen quantity, analyte quality and the time from sample acquisition to results report. Methods: Patients with advanced cancers underwent surgical resection, excisional/core biopsies, or bone marrow biopsy. Samples were analyzed by whole genome or exome sequencing in addition to RNA sequencing, bioinformatics analysis, and therapeutic target prioritization by a multi-disciplinary Clinical Genomics Board. All prioritized targets were CLIA validated using Sanger sequencing, RT-qPCR, FISH, or IHC as appropriate. Treatment was delivered using off-label FDA approved drugs, clinical trials, or single patient INDs. Results: We have enrolled 40 patients for whom sequencing data is available on 33. The initial 6 patients were evaluated in a non-CLIA pilot phase and 27 in a CLIA-enabled phase. Tumor types in the CLIA-enabled phase with the highest enrollment were pancreatic cancer (n=8) and cholangiocarcinoma (n=8). We sought to quantify the targets identified along with clinical benefit, defining these as the “Actionable Index” (AI) (proportion of patients with ≥ 1 putative drug target) and “Utility Index” (UI) (proportion of patients who derive clinical benefit). Putative therapeutic targets were identified in 7/8 (AI=0.88) cholangiocarcinoma (CC) patients and in 5/8 (AI=0.63) pancreatic cancer (PC) patients. All 3 CC patients who received target directed treatment achieved a partial response (UI=0.38). In contrast, none of the 4 PC patients who received target directed therapy had treatment response (UI=0.0). Interestingly no actionable targets were identified in 1 CC and in 2 PCs. One CC with an identified target was unable to access the drug and subsequently died. A CC patient and a PC patient, each with identified targets, expired prior to the initiation of therapy. Conclusions: While whole genome/exome/RNA sequencing is providing unparalleled detail of tumor genomes, the application to the clinic must be carefully considered. Actionability of targets will eventually need to be defined in close relation to eventual clinical utility and appropriate refinements to disease-gene-drug databases implemented. Preliminary observations in pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma demonstrate disparity in correlation between utility indices and actionable indices. Application of these tools in larger cohorts and types of tumors will need to be conducted to ascertain more precise estimates. Additional measures that are organ-site agnostic but pertain to specific targets (e.g. BRAF) will also need to be developed in order to facilitate more judicious application of sequencing in the clinical setting. Citation Format: Jan B. Egan, Alan H. Bryce, Mia D. Champion, Winnie S. Liang, Rafael Fonseca, Ann E. McCullough, Michael T. Barrett, Katherine Hunt, Rachel M. Condjella, Robert R. McWilliams, Stephen D. Mastrian, Janine LoBello, Daniel Von Hoff, David W. Craig, A. Keith Stewart, John D. Carpten, Mitesh J. Borad. Indices of actionability and clinical utility in a CLIA-enabled study of whole genome/exome/RNA sequencing in 33 cancer patients: Actionable vs. utility. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 4694. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-4694