Borah, Bijan J.

566 Background: Video telemedicine visits (VTVs) have the potential to overcome disparities in access to cancer care for many socially, geographically, and economically disadvantaged populations. Internet connectivity, digital literacy, and socioeconomic factors are traditionally cited as influencing VTV utilization. However, digital diffusion has occurred rapidly across several sectors, including healthcare, since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, and less is known about how these factors have evolved to influence VTV utilization behavior over this time. Through a qualitative approach, we aimed to: (1) explore the lived experiences of cancer patients who transitioned to VTV use as compared to those who persistently did not, and (2) identify similarities and differences between these two groups that could inform targeted interventions to support access and patient acceptance of VTVs in the setting of cancer care. Methods: During June 2024, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 24 patients (Mean age 71.3 years, range 42-88; female 50%) receiving ongoing, longitudinal cancer care at our academic medical center since July 2021 who had not used VTVs through at least October 2022. Using purposeful sampling, patients were equally divided according to VTV utilization behaviors defined as “transitioned users” (TU; i.e. those who transitioned to VTV utilization after October 2022) and “persistent non-users” (PNU). Transcripts were analyzed using a combined deductive–inductive thematic approach and categorized into themes of barriers and facilitators across three domains consistent with the COM-B model: capabilities (C), opportunities (O), and motivations (M). Results: TU patients frequently cited a reduction in travel and logistical considerations as a primary reason for uptake of VTVs. PNU patients frequently reported digital literacy barriers, particularly among older patients, as primary reasons for lack of VTV utilization. TU patients reported more experience and comfort in technical skills as compared to PNU participants. PNU patients also reported less frequent offering of VTV as an option by their care teams over time, implying they may have transitioned to VTV utilization if it had been offered with more regularity. Both study groups desired improved internet access and technical support to enhance (or, in the case of PNU patients, enable) VTV utilization. Conclusions: These findings suggest that multi-modal care delivery may best serve current patient populations, not requiring, yet offering VTV services as an adjunct to in-person care. Longer term, individual barriers to VTV use will also need to be addressed to further optimize access for patients who desire to incorporate this care modality.

Objective: Patients with chronic pancreatitis commonly experience abdominal pain, anxiety, depression, reduced mobility, and difficulty performing daily activities or maintaining employment. These factors contribute to diminished quality-of-life and high healthcare utilization. This study aims to explore the relationship between specific quality-of-life domains among patients with chronic pancreatitis. Methods: A 55-item online survey was administered to patients with the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis at 3 Mayo Clinic sites from December 26, 2023, to December 26, 2024. The survey included validated questions assessing demographic, clinical, and quality-of-life metrics using EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level instrument—a standardized assessment tool that evaluates 5 key health dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Results: Of the 298 patients with chronic pancreatitis who completed the survey, employed patients had decreased odds of reporting problems with mobility (odds ratio [OR] = 0.45, P < .05), self-care (OR = 0.26, P < .01), usual activities (OR = 0.47, P < .05), and anxiety/depression (OR = 0.41, P < .05). Similarly, older patients had decreased odds of reporting problems with self-care (OR = 0.91, P < .01), usual activities (OR = 0.96, P < .01), pain/discomfort (OR = 0.96, P < .01) and anxiety/depression (OR = 0.92, P < .01). However, Medicare patients had greater odds of reporting problems with self-care (OR = 5.54, P < .01) and pain/discomfort (OR = 2.58, P < .05). Conclusions: Chronic pancreatitis impacts multiple dimensions of quality-of-life beyond pain. The EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level tool enables comprehensive assessment of physical and mental health. Our findings highlight key associations between patient characteristics and quality-of-life domains, supporting the need for individualized, deficit-targeted interventions. These results also suggest a potential role for vocational rehabilitation in promoting functional recovery and enhancing overall well-being in individuals with chronic pancreatitis.

Abstract Purpose Overuse of thyroid ultrasound (TUS) has contributed to rising thyroid cancer diagnoses and is projected to increase US healthcare costs from $1.5 billion to $3.5 billion by 2030. This study evaluated the healthcare cost of inappropriately ordered TUS in a national multicenter academic system. Methods This is a secondary cost analysis of a retrospective cohort study across 4 Mayo Clinic sites (Rochester, MN; Jacksonville, FL; Scottsdale, AZ; and the Midwest Mayo Clinic Health System). Adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing their first TUS between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2021, with at least 1 year of follow-up were included. TUS indications were classified as appropriate or inappropriate using a guideline-based natural language processing algorithm. The primary outcome was a comparison of adjusted 1-year all-cause healthcare costs. A secondary analysis calculated the direct procedural costs of the inappropriate TUS cascade. Results Among 6984 patients (mean age 56 [SD 16.4]; 76.2% female; 90.9% White), 546 (7.8%) underwent TUS for inappropriate indications. These patients were younger (mean age 53.0 vs 56.3 years, P &lt; .0001) but otherwise demographically similar. Adjusted total healthcare costs over 90 days and 1 year were comparable: $4842 vs $5794 and $13 748 vs $14 257 for inappropriate vs appropriate TUS, respectively. The inappropriate TUS cascade, including an estimated 56 subsequent biopsies and 22 thyroidectomies, resulted in a minimum of $576 134 in direct procedural costs. Conclusion While adjusted total costs were similar, inappropriate TUS represents potentially avoidable spending and remains a viable target for cost-reduction strategies. Reducing low-value imaging remains a critical target for cost-saving interventions.

Abstract The objective of this study was to estimate the average hospitalization cost (AHC) for deliveries affected by severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and analyze trends from 2014 to 2019. The study also aimed to explore cost stratification based on patient, delivery, and hospital characteristics. Using the National Inpatient Sample dataset, all delivery hospitalizations from 2014 to 2019 were identified. Deliveries affected by SMM were determined based on the Centers for Disease Control definition. Deliveries were categorized into three groups: no SMM (nSMM), any SMM (aSMM), and SMM excluding cases with blood transfusion as the only indicator (SMMeBTo). A regression model accounting for survey design and adjusting for variables including age, race/ethnicity, primary payer, income, delivery method, hospital location/teaching status, and hospital region was used to test the trends in incidence. Hospital charges were adjusted using cost-to-charge ratios and presented in 2022 U.S. dollars ($). A regression model adjusting for the same variables was used to assess costs. From 2014 to 2019, 4,444,957 deliveries were identified, with a weighted estimate of 22,224,775. The rates of aSMM and SMMeBTo were 1.9 and 0.7%, respectively. AHC was $5,218 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: $5,200–5,235) for nSMM, $11,101 (95% CI: $11,038–11,165) for aSMM, and $11,541 (95% CI: $114,330–11,650) for SMMeBTo. Hospitalization costs across all SMM categories rose annually from 2014 to 2017, decreased in 2018, and peaked in 2019. All races had significantly higher costs than non-Hispanic Whites across all SMM categories. SMM costs were higher for cesarean deliveries. The highest cost was in deliveries involving a temporary tracheostomy. Urban teaching hospitals and those in the Northeast had the highest SMM costs. Deliveries affected by SMM incur significantly higher costs, with these costs increasing over time. Understanding disparities across patient factors, delivery methods, and hospital characteristics can inform interventions aimed at addressing inequities.

Abstract RATIONALE: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a fatal interstitial lung disease characterized by chronic and progressive decline in lung function with unknown cause. Previous economic burden of IPF estimates were based on data from 2011 or earlier. Thus, more current estimates will help inform policymaking. This study aimed to quantify the healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and direct costs associated with IPF, overall and by payer type (commercial or Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug [MAPD] plan). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the Optum® Research claims database from 01/01/2016 through 12/31/2023. Adult patients with IPF (defined as ≥2 claims with IPF diagnosis code within 365 days) were identified (IPF cohort), with the date of the first IPF medical diagnosis code set as the index date. A general population without IPF (control cohort) was exact matched to the IPF cohort in 1:4 ratio, based on age group, sex, geographical region, payer type (commercial vs. MAPD), and race/ethnicity. The assigned index date for the control cohort was the same as the index date of the matched IPF patient. Continuous enrollment of 12 months before and 3 months after the index date was required for both cohorts. All-cause and respiratory-related HCRU and direct costs were compared between the cohorts during the variable follow-up period, reported as observation time-weighted per-patient-per-month (wPPPM). RESULTS: A total of 7,670 IPF patients were exact matched to 30,680 control patients. The mean age was 76 years and 59% were male. HCRU during the follow-up was significantly greater across all categories in the IPF cohort compared to control cohort (p&lt;0.001) (Table 1). The mean (standard deviation [SD]) wPPPM all-cause total healthcare costs were nearly four times higher for the IPF cohort compared to control cohort ($4,724 [$8,368] vs. $1,197 [$2,134], p&lt;0.001). Hospitalization costs accounted for the largest proportion of all-cause medical costs for the IPF cohort (55%), whereas ambulatory costs were the largest for the control cohort (49%). The IPF cohort had significantly higher wPPPM pharmacy costs compared to the matched control cohort ($2,289 [$3,861] vs. $321 [$1,133], p&lt;0.001) (Table 1). Similar trends were observed in respiratory-related HCRU and costs. When stratified by payer types, the total costs were significantly higher for commercially insured patients compared to patients with MAPD plan. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated that patients with IPF incur higher economic burden compared to those without the disease, highlighting the need for more effective treatments to reduce costly healthcare resource utilization.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Rising US healthcare costs and the COVID-19 pandemic put increased pressure on hospitals to reduce patient length of stay (LOS) while maintaining high-quality care. We aimed to determine if implementing a pathway for same-day discharge after elective neuroendovascular procedures to a monitored hotel setting is safe, feasible, and cost-effective. METHODS: We evaluated patient outcomes after elective neuroendovascular procedures and same-day discharge to an on-campus Care Hotel. The study enrolled patients aged ≥18 years from October 1, 2020, to February 28, 2023. Exclusion criteria comprised major comorbidities, additional care necessitating hospitalization, absence of a caregiver, insurer-mandated hospitalization, or patient refusal of the Care Hotel model. Primary outcomes were readmission rate or prolonged LOS, new ischemic or hemorrhagic complications rate, and death rate from vascular causes within 6 months. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and deaths related to causes other than vascular complications within 6 months and changes in modified Rankin Scale score by 1 or more points at last follow-up. Healthcare cost savings associated with same-day discharge were analyzed using a control group. RESULTS: The study included 42 patients discharged to the Care Hotel and 84 controls. The average age was 61 years in the Care Hotel group and 64 years in the control group, and aneurysm treatment was the most frequent neuroendovascular procedure (83.3% and 79.8%, respectively). The readmission and extended LOS rates were 4.8% for the Care Hotel group. The rate of new ischemic or hemorrhagic complications was 4.8%. Cost analysis estimated savings of $7730.12 per procedure. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the Care Hotel model is a safe, feasible, and cost-effective option for carefully selected patients undergoing elective neuroendovascular interventions. Adherence to discharge readiness criteria and meticulous patient selection are critical to minimizing complications and readmissions.