Jack, Clifford R.

Abstract Background Atypical clinical presentations of Alzheimer's disease (AD) are associated with heterogeneous patterns of cortical tau‐PET uptake. The medial‐temporal (MTL) meta‐ROI is typically used to determine tau‐PET abnormality in AD, but this approach may not detect focal uptake in atypical patients. Our goal was to develop regional tau‐PET cut‐points and determine whether the number of positive regions better captures positive tau‐PET signal in atypical AD. Method 127 amyloid‐positive atypical AD (visual=68, language=39, motor=15, others=5) and 62 amyloid‐negative cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals were recruited by the Neurodegenerative Research Group, Mayo Clinic, and underwent, amyloid‐PET and 18 F‐AV‐1451(tau)‐PET. Images were parcellated using the modified Harvard‐Oxford atlas and we focused on 67 AD‐specific regions. Rather than using the average SUVR across voxels within a region to quantify uptake, we used the 95 th percentile of SUVR values across voxels within a region to capture focal cases. We then used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methods and a Youden threshold to define regional abnormality. The number of abnormal regions was calculated for each participant and used to discriminate between CU and atypical AD at the individual level. Result Across 64 regions, our approach showed excellent (AUROC>0.90) differentiation between atypical AD and CU. The temporal‐fusiform, parahippocampal gyrus and inferior temporal gyrus showed the best differentiation (Figure 1). All 67 regions showed excellent specificity (>85%), with 63 regions showing excellent sensitivity (≥80%). The lateral occipital cortex, temporal‐fusiform and parahippocampal gyrus showed the best specificity and sensitivity (Figure 2). The distribution of the number of tau‐elevated regions is shown in Figure 3. 74% of CU had no positive regions, while 43% of the atypical AD patients had all 67 regions affected. An optimal threshold of 7 tau‐elevated regions classified all CU below, and 123 (97%) atypical AD above threshold. Using a standard approach based on the average SUVR in the MTL meta‐ROI, only 116 (91%) atypical AD patients were tau‐PET positive. Conclusion Tau uptake in temporal regions showed the greatest group‐level differentiation. However, examining regional tau‐positivity may offer better sensitivity in atypical AD patients compared to the temporal meta‐ROI, likely due to the presence of focal non‐temporal patterns of uptake.

Abstract Background The tau PET imaging with 18F‐flortacipir (18F‐FTP) has focused interest in accurately tracking longitudinal tau changes in Alzheimer's disease [1]. Thus, minimizing variability is critical. Off‐target signal has the potential to complicate interpretation of tau‐PET imaging due to potential spillover or bleed‐in effects, with increased effects seen in later stages of Alzheimer's due to cerebral atrophy and proximity of off‐target areas to relevant cortical areas[2]. Previously, we demonstrated the effect of uptake period activity on 18F‐FTP signal. With increasing recent interest in demographic factors that may affect off‐target binding, we investigated the effect of age in extra‐cerebral off‐target signal in 18F‐FTP PET imaging. Method Standard 18F‐FTP PET protocol was performed in 330 participants. Two independent readers measured tau uptake in predetermined off‐target regions, including extraocular muscle, meninges, and occipital bone among others. Linear regression models assessed the relationship between participants’ age, sex, and tau uptake values (SUV and SUVr) (SUV = (Tissue radioactivity concentration / Injected dose) / Body weight & SUVr = SUV of target region/ SUV of reference region.) Result Sex had a significant effect on off‐target signal in most brain regions, with variable positive or negative correlation based on area. Notably, SUV in the eyeball‐retina, occipital bone, upper skull meninges all showed significant positive correlation with sex, with ‘male’ status generally associated with lower SUV. The greatest effect of sex was observed in superior skull meninges, occipital bone, and internal carotid artery ( p <0.001). Age showed minimally affected SUV and SUVr in off‐target regions. SUVr values show a significant correlation with SUV values of upper skull meninges in sex. Cognitive status did not significantly affect off‐target SUV. Conclusion We observed that sex significantly affected extra‐brain off‐target signal in 18F‐FTP PET imaging, while age has minimal effect, adding to previous evidence of off‐target binding within brain regions. Further evaluation is necessary to understand the age‐related effects on off‐target regions. As a result, the variability introduced by sex may pose challenges to studying tau accumulation.

Abstract Background An intense search is underway for tau PET tracers with enhanced capability to visualize tau aggregates. Research indicates that [18F] AV1451 and [18F]MK 6240 exhibit comparable binding properties in terms of spatial distribution and severity of tau aggregates, as observed both in‐vivo and in‐vitro. This study focused on head‐to‐head pathological comparison of both the tracers binding specificity to tangle maturity levels (pretangles, mature tangles and ghost tangles) of tau aggregates as seen on autoradiography as compared to CP‐13 (early tangle maturity marker) and PHF‐1(middling tangle maturity marker) immunohistochemical (IHC) stains in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and non‐AD tauopathies. Method Study participants included included those with AD and non‐AD tauopathies. Analyses were performed on serial 5um formalin fixed paraffin embedded postmortem human brain sections acquired from Mayo clinic brain bank. Visual assessment of colocalization with IHC as well as quantitative analyses were used. IHC sections were incubated with antibodies CP‐13 (recognizing early tangle maturity) and PHF‐1 (recognizing middling tangle maturity). Result A total of 38 participants were examined. The participants included a spectrum from normal to AD, including mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and atypical AD. Participants with N279K (4R), P301L (4R), and R406W MAPT mutations (3R+4R) were included as well. Both the tracers showed strong binding to AD tau aggregates and no or minimal binding to non‐AD tauopathies. Generally, early tangle maturity tau accumulation participants had more tau demonstrated with CP‐13 than PHF‐1 and both the tracers [18F]MK 6240 and [18F]AV 1451 binding are well correlated with the PHF‐1 staining suggesting the preference for middling tangle level and minimal to early tangles. Conclusion The emergence and validation of these new tau PET tracers have opened new opportunities for the development of more accurate diagnostic and management tools for AD. In our study on post‐mortem sections, [ 18 F]MK‐6240 and [ 18 F]Flortaucipir showed similar binding profiles with preference to middling tangle maturity levels.