Ashing, Kimlin Tam

Abstract Black/African American populations, globally, bear the greatest prostate cancer (CaP) burden compared to other racial/ethnic groups. Addressing CaP disparities in Black men is complex, requiring a patient-centered, community-centric and comprehensive approach. This study integrates iCCaRE Consortium findings and broader literature to address unmet needs in survivorship care. The iCCaRE Consortium implemented five complementary pilot studies using mixed-methods designs, including feasibility trials, qualitative research, and observational analyses across the United States and sub-Saharan Africa. Descriptive statistics, subgroup analyses, and qualitative thematic analyses were performed across these studies. Collectively, projects addressed multilevel determinants including social, behavioral, and biological drivers of disparities. Project 1 implemented a Virtual Reality Assistant (ViRA) across clinical and community settings, with ongoing evaluation in pragmatic trials. Project 2 showed strong patient preference for home-based cancer care. Project 3 enrolled demonstrated trends toward improved health-related quality of life. Project 4 identified key themes influencing survivorship experiences. Project 5 identified biological mechanisms linking stress, immune modulation, and symptom burden. The iCCaRE pilot projects demonstrate the feasibility and early impact of a consortium-based, transdisciplinary approach to addressing CaP disparities in Black men. These findings highlight the importance of integrating patient-centered interventions, community engagement, and biological insights to inform scalable strategies aimed at improving survivorship outcomes and advancing health equity. The iCCaRE Consortium demonstrates that a transatlantic, patient-centered, and multidisciplinary approach integrating social, clinical, and biological factors can generate scalable strategies to improve survivorship outcomes and advance equity in CaP care for Black men.

Background: While much of cancer research has historically centered on innovations within clinical or laboratory settings, most of the factors shaping equity in cancer outcomes reside outside hospital walls—in neighborhoods, workplaces, and community networks. This reality underscores the need for community-involved and community-living interventions: programs co-designed and delivered within communities to meet people where they live, work, and socialize . Such interventions hold the greatest promise for sustainability because they are embedded in the daily lives, cultures, and resources of the populations they serve. Methods: This special collection brings together research that illuminates the power of community-centered and community co-led strategies for prevention, early detection, treatment, and survivorship across diverse settings. Results: The articles in this series illustrate how innovation, cultural humility, and local engagement can bridge persistent gaps in cancer care. Conclusion: Together, they highlight how communities themselves are essential partners in dismantling disparities and achieving lasting cancer control.

Community Outreach and Engagement (COE) ought to be prioritized, resourced, and supported to appropriately fulfill the Cures Act and tackle Catchment Community cancer burden and disparities. COE is not a person but the vision of community/public cancer prevention and control that surpasses both political and institutional leaders.