Rocha, Andreia

Abstract Background The Alzheimer's Association workgroup criteria (AA‐2024) suggest four biological stages based on PET imaging. However, the application of this framework may vary depending on the tau PET tracer used, and the distribution of clinical stages by biological stage may differ. Here, we aim to compare the diagnostic performance of the biological staging of Alzheimer Disease using two different tau PET tracers. Method We analyzed 446 individuals and further stratified 167 Aβ‐positive participants from the HEAD study (Longitudinal multicenter head‐to‐head harmonization of tau PET tracers) that underwent both MK‐6240 and Flortaucipir (FTP) tau PET. Four clinical stages (normal, transitional, MCI, and dementia) were defined based on the AA‐2024 criteria. Within stage‐2 we assessed subgroups: subjective cognitive decline (SCD), subtle objective cognitive decline (SOCD), and mild behavioral impairment (MBI). Logistic and linear models corrected by age and sex tested association of groups with amyloid and tau pathology. The biological staging was performed using tracer‐specific thresholds for regional SUVR and testing two regions of interest schemes: (i) proposed by AA‐2024 and (ii) Braak stages (Figure 1). Cohen's weighted‐kappa (K) statistic measured clinical‐biological agreement. Positive predictive value (PPV) of an individual being clinically impaired (MCI or dementia) was calculated for each biological stage. Result Clinical stages showed a progressively increased prevalence of Aβ‐positivity and higher entorhinal tau PET pathology from cognitively normal (CN) to SOCD, MCI, and dementia in both tracers. MBI and SCD transitional groups showed no increased Aβ or tau pathology compared to CN (Figure 2). For this reason, only SOCD was considered part of stage 2 for following analyses. All tested biological staging strategies showed moderate agreement (0.34‐0.59) with clinical stages using either tracers. The distribution of biological across clinical stages were similar for FTP and MK, with MK‐6240 showing lower PPV values in earlier stages than FTP (Table 1). Conclusion Our results support that AA‐2024 biological and clinical stages show similar clinical‐biological concordance using either Flortaucipir or MK‐6240, although this can vary based on methods tested in the study. The MBI and SCD clinical subgroups showed no difference of pathological burden to clinical stage 1, while SOCD transitional stage showed higher burden compared to stage 1.

Abstract Background Tau PET tracers present distinct binding characteristics that might influence their trajectories and relationship with other biomarkers along the AD continuum. In a head‐to‐head study, we investigated the relationship between the emergence of PET tracers MK6240 and Flortaucipir, and plasma p ‐tau217 abnormalities as a function of Aβ PET deposition. We further assessed the concordance between tau PET and plasma p ‐tau217 positivity and its relationship with cognitive scores. Method We evaluated 352 individuals from the HEAD study (205 cognitively unimpaired and 147 cognitively impaired) with Aβ PET, MK6240 and Flortaucipir tau PET, and plasma p ‐tau217 (ALZpath) and GFAP (Quanterix) measures. Tau PET Braak regions, plasma p ‐tau217 trajectories were modeled as functions of Aβ burden (Centiloid scale) using the Lowess method. Biomarkers were z‐scored anchored on young individuals ( n = 19, < 28 years old) as anchors. Tau PET (Braak 1 region) and plasma p ‐tau217 were considered positive/abnormal when surpassing 2.5 z‐score. Result Among the tested markers, MK6240 was the earliest to show abnormality as a function of Centiloid, occurring at 22 Centiloids, followed by plasma p ‐tau217 at 38 Centiloid and Flortaucipir at Centiloid 56 (Figure 1). Tau PET and plasma p ‐tau217 positivity showed an overall high concordance (∼80% for both tracers; Figure 2). In MK6240 discordant cases, most individuals were MK6240+/p‐tau217‐ (13.8%), while 6.6% were MK6240‐/p‐tau217+ (Figure 2A). For Flortaucipir, 15% of discordant cases were Flortaucipir‐/p‐tau217+, while 4.8% were Flortaucipir+/p‐tau217‐ (Figure 2B). The discordant groups present higher Centiloid than the ptau217‐/Tau‐ group and overall decreased scores in cognitive tests, except for p ‐tau217+/MK6240‐ group (Figure 3). Conclusion MK6240 becomes abnormal at lower levels of Aβ burden compared to plasma p ‐tau217 and Flortaucipir. The relatively high prevalence of discordant tau PET positive or plasma p ‐tau217 positive and suggests that some individuals may show tau PET positivity first, while others may exhibit plasma p ‐tau217 positivity first. The distinct cognitive profiles of this groups suggest potential clinical relevance, warranting further investigation.