Gordon, Brian A.

Abstract Background Tau‐PET provides critical topographic information on tau deposition in the living brain. Integrating research‐based practices into clinical settings through qualitative methods, such as visual reads, is becoming increasingly important. This study aims to compare the performance of existing visual reading methods for [ 18 F]Flortaucipir (FTP) and [ 18 F]MK‐6240 (MK) and provide preliminary data toward a unified visual reading approach for all tau‐PET tracers using a head‐to‐head dataset. Methods The study design and development plans are illustrated in Figure 1. To evaluate previously published visual reading methods, two blinded raters conducted FTP and MK visual reads on 340 participants from the HEAD study. A unified visual reading method was developed and tested on 101 participants, using a composite of adjusted Braak regions to determine 3 stages of severity while harmonizing between tracers. For external validation, the method will be tested on four additional cohorts, each using one of the following tracers: FTP, MK, PI, or RO. Results Inter‐rater agreement using previous methods (Figure 2A) showed high Cohen's kappa values (0.71‐0.77) for the low and high tau burden categories in both FTP and MK visual reads. However, agreement was substantially lower in the non‐AD‐like category , leading to overall agreement rates of 0.55 for FTP and 0.69 for MK . In contrast, the method developed here improved inter‐rater agreement across all categories (0.87‐0.96) and introduced a moderate tau (0.79‐0.83) burden group (Figure 2B), leading to higher overall agreement rates of 0.81 for FTP and 0.87 for MK (Figure 2C). For inter‐tracer agreement (Figure 3), previous methods resulted in discordant visual reads for FTP and MK in 34.4% of cases for rater 1 and 24.7% for rater 2. The developed method reduced this disagreement to 11.9% (rater 1) and 15.8% (rater 2), demonstrating improved consistency across different tracers. Conclusion This study demonstrates that previously published visual reading methods produced varying classifications depending on the tracer used. The method proposed here improved inter‐rater and inter‐tracer visual read agreements by developing a unified, tracer‐agnostic approach easy to be used. Importantly, this clinician‐friendly method has the potential for widespread adoption, offering a single harmonized visual reading technique for all tau‐PET tracers.

Abstract Background One of the hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the progressive spread of tau pathology. However, heterogeneity in the spatial patterns of tau deposition at the individual level may contribute to distinct clinical presentations. Here, we investigated the different patterns of tau deposition across disease progression and the different cognitive profiles linked to these patterns. Method We investigated 106 tau PET positive individuals (16% cognitively unimpaired, 84% amnestic cognitively impaired) from the HEAD study using head‐to‐head Flortaucipir and MK6240 tau PET. For each tracer, we extracted the SUVR values from seven major brain networks: Limbic, Visual (Vis), Default Mode (Default), Dorsal Attention (DorsAttn), Frontoparietal, Somatomotor (SomMot) and Salience Ventral Attention (SalVentAttn) as well as the Entorhinal cortex. Pathways were identified by ranking regions from highest to lowest SUVR, with the region displaying the highest SUVR value being defined as the peak region. Individuals in late stages of tau deposition displaying distinct pathways were compared. Image averages and voxel‐wise group comparisons using tau negative individuals as the reference were generated for each pathway and tau PET tracer. Cognitive differences were assessed using ANOVA for MoCA score and domain‐specific composite scores for Memory, Attention and Visuospatial skills. Result In all individuals and tracers, tau in the Entorhinal cortex progressed to the Limbic network, supporting a common starting point for tau propagation. Beyond these initial stages, tau propagation followed three main distinct pathways following either the Vis, Default or DorsAttn networks (Figure 1). Voxel‐wise comparison between individuals across these three pathways captured clear and similar differences in tau PET uptake as measured with Flortaucipir and MK6240. (Figure 2). While MoCA and Memory scores did not differ between groups, individuals following the Vis network exhibited significantly lower Attention scores compared to those in the Default and DorsAttn networks. Additionally, individuals following the Vis network exhibited lower Visuospatial scores compared to the Default network group (Figure 3). Conclusion Our results indicate a model in which, although tau progresses hierarchically, its deposition peaks mainly follow specific networks, which drive tau deposition and, consequently, the clinical manifestations of AD.