Katzka, David A.

Background: Question prompt lists (QPLs) are structured sets of disease-specific questions intended for patient use, enhancing the patient-physician communication by encouraging patients to ask relevant questions during a consultation. Recently, a preliminary 78 question gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) specific QPL was created by 12 esophageal experts through a modified Delphi (RAND/University of California, Los Angeles) technique. Patients’ perspectives and opinions on each question, however, had not been accounted for in the preliminary expert’ version. Aim: The aim was to modify a preliminary experts’ QPL, specific to adults with GERD, following patient perspectives and opinions. Methods: A preliminary GERD QPL was modified through patient input and opinions. Thirty-eight patients with a clinical diagnosis of GERD followed at Stanford University Esophageal Clinic between January and November 2019 were consented to modify the preliminary 78 question expert QPL version. After receiving the QPL in Qualtrics (Provo, UT) by a direct e-mail invitation, patients independently rated questions on a 5-point Likert scale, where 1=“should not be included,” 2=“unimportant,” 3=“don’t know/depends,” 4=“important,” and 5=“essential.” Questions were accepted for inclusion in the QPL with an a priori interagreement of 80% ranking in the range of 4 to 5. At the end, patients were encouraged to propose additional questions to incorporate into the QPL by open-endedly asking “Are there questions we didn’t ask, that you think we should?” Results: Twenty-three patients with GERD (19 female, median age 64) fully participated and modified the existing QPL (60.5%). Of the 78 questions from the preliminary GERD QPL, 66 questions (84.6%) were accepted for inclusion. The question with the highest agreement among patients rating a question as essential consisted of “what habits, food, and drinks do I have to avoid?” (82.6%). Questions eliminated because of disagreement included “What is the natural history of GERD,” “Do I have a high chance to die from my Barrett’s?,” and “Why are you prescribing an antidepressant to treat my GERD?” Nine patients suggested additional questions totaling to 16 separate questions, including “What type of surgeries are there to help GERD?,” “What stage is my GERD?,” “What are the odds/percentage of getting cancer from GERD?” Incorporating the suggested questions, the final GERD QPL—created by esophageal experts and modified by patients—consisted of 82 questions. Conclusion: Esophageal experts and GERD patients have a high level of agreement on important questions, though there is some variation in perspective. Future studies can simplify this list and measure the impact of a shared GERD QPL on patients’ decisional conflict and perceived involvement in care.

AbstractBackgroundAspiration pneumonia is the commonest cause of hospitalizations and death in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Among these patients, the relationships between severity of dysphagia, hospitalizations for related complications, and death are not robustly defined. Our aim was to characterize the relationship between PD‐related oropharyngeal dysfunction and clinically relevant outcomes.MethodsRetrospective cohort study of 312 patients with PD at a tertiary center who underwent videofluoroscopic swallow studies conducted by expert therapists between 2010 and 2015. Level of swallowing function was represented using the 7‐point Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) (7 = normal function). Significance and relative risk calculations utilized Poisson regression. Time to composite outcome of first hospitalization or death was summarized using Kaplan‐Meier curve with log‐rank test.Key ResultsOne hundred thirty eight patients had a recorded FOIS score. The prevalence of oropharyngeal dysfunction was 76.1%. The median duration of follow‐up was 26.8 months. In multivariate analyses, patients with FOIS 5 (RR = 2.01 [95% CI: 1.22, 3.32]), FOIS 3 (RR = 2.78 [95% CI: 1.75, 4.40]), and FOIS 1 (RR = 2.50 [95% CI: 1.49, 4.20]) were significantly associated with increased risk of hospitalization or death compared to FOIS 7 after co‐variate adjustments. GERD was also associated with a significant increased risk of hospitalization or death (RR = 1.28 [95% CI: 1.01, 1.64]). Time to first hospitalization or death was shorter in patients with lower FOIS scores (p < 0.00005).Conclusions and InferencesSeverity of oropharyngeal dysphagia, as measured by the FOIS, is associated with poorer survival and shorter time to hospitalization for dysphagia‐related complications, pneumonia, or death in PD.

INTRODUCTION: We examined national Google Trends and local healthcare utilization after 3 high-impact gastroenterology publications. METHODS: Changes in US Google Trends and Olmsted County health utilization were studied. RESULTS: Publication views within 30 days were 51,458 ( Imperiale ), 49,759 ( Pimentel ), and 18,750 ( Gomm ). Colonoscopy searches ( P = 0.04) and Cologuard tests performed ( P < 0.01) increased while colonoscopies decreased ( P < 0.01). Searches for rifaximin ( P = 0.05), irritable bowel syndrome ( P < 0.01), diarrhea ( P < 0.01), and rifaximin prescriptions ( P = 0.02) increased. Increase in hydrogen-2 blocker searches ( P = 0.02) and prescriptions ( P < 0.01) and gastroesophageal reflux disease ( P < 0.01) and dementia office visits ( P < 0.01) occurred. DISCUSSION: High-impact gastroenterology publications influence Google searches and local population-based healthcare utilization.

Background/Aims: Barrett’s esophagus (BE), defined by the presence of intestinal metaplasia (IM) on histology, is thought to be the only identifiable precursor lesion for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Recent studies have suggested the possibility of an alternate, non-IM associated EAC that is a more aggressive form of EAC with worse survival. Among EAC patients, we aimed to compare survival of patients with and without IM at the time of diagnosis. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients with histologic confirmed EAC evaluated at a tertiary care center from 2013 to 2019. Cases were categorized according to the presence or absence of IM on histologic specimens (Group I—IM-EAC and Group II—non-IM-EAC). We compared demographic characteristics, clinical stage, therapy, and survival between the 2 groups using the Chi-square and ANOVA tests (for categorical and continuous variables, respectively). We used Cox proportional hazards regression to determine the association of IM with overall survival, adjusting for sex, age at diagnosis, tumor location, histologic grade, and clinical stage. Results: A total of 475 patients were included in this analysis (mean age 64.8 years [SD 10.8], 89% white) and 109 (23.0%) had no evidence of IM. Compared with IM-EAC (Group I), individuals in the non-IM-EAC group were younger ( P = .01) and had a greater proportion of patients diagnosed with advanced disease (49.5 vs 20.2% for stage 4, P < .001). These patients were less likely to undergo endoscopic therapy alone (0.92% vs 29.78%, P < .001) or surgery alone (0 vs 9.84%, P = .001). On multivariable analysis, the presence of IM-EAC was associated with improved overall survival compared to non-IM-EAC (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.49-0.96). Additional factors associated with poor survival was increasing stage of diagnosis (HR 6.49: 95% CI 3.77-11.15 for stage 4, HR 2.19: 95% CI 1.25-3.84 for stage 3, HR 2.04: 95% CI 0.98-4.25 for stage 2 compared to stage 1) and more advanced histologic stage (HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.26-3.19) for poorly/undifferentiated compared to well differentiated). Conclusions: EAC without the presence of IM on histology was associated with worse survival compared to those with IM. Future prospective studies with detailed molecular sequencing are required to clarify if 2 separate phenotypes of EAC exist (IM-EAC and non-IM-EAC). If confirmed, this may have significant implications for screening and management strategies.

SummaryBackgroundNeoplasia detection rate, the proportion of Barrett's oesophagus patients with high‐grade dysplasia or oesophageal adenocarcinoma detected at index surveillance endoscopy has been proposed as a quality metric. However, the correlation between neoplasia detection rate and a clinically relevant outcome like post‐endoscopy Barrett's neoplasia remains unknown. Post‐endoscopy Barrett's neoplasia refers to the rate of high‐grade dysplasia or oesophageal adenocarcinoma on repeat endoscopy within one year of an index screening examination revealing non‐dysplastic Barrett's oesophagus or low‐grade dysplasia.AimTo assess correlation between neoplasia detection rate and post‐endoscopy Barrett's neoplasia.MethodsWe performed a systematic search of multiple databases from date of inception to June 2021 to identify cohort studies reporting both neoplasia detection rate and post‐endoscopy Barrett's neoplasia. Data from each study were pooled using a random effects model, and their correlation assessed using meta‐regression. Heterogeneity was assessed and a priori planned subgroup analyses were conducted.ResultsTen studies with 27 894 patients with Barrett's oesophagus were included. The pooled neoplasia detection rate and post‐endoscopy Barrett's neoplasia were 5.0% (95% CI: 3.4%‐7.1%, I2 = 97%) and 19.6% (95% CI: 10.1%‐34.7%, I2 = 96%), respectively. Meta‐regression revealed a statistically significant inverse relationship between the two variables (coefficient −3.50, 95% CI: −4.63 to −2.37, P < 0.01). With every 1% increase of neoplasia detection rate, post‐endoscopy Barrett's neoplasia decreased by 3.50%. Heterogeneity was high despite adjusting for study quality and performing several subgroup analyses.ConclusionWe observed a statistically significant inverse correlation between neoplasia detection rate and post‐endoscopy Barrett's neoplasia. Additional studies are needed to further validate this correlation.

Abstract The recommended diagnostic criteria for achalasia have been recently updated by Chicago Classification version 4.0 (CCv4.0), the widely accepted classification scheme for esophageal motility disorders using metrics from high‐resolution manometry (HRM). CCv4.0 continued upon prior versions by subtyping achalasia into type I, type II, and type III on HRM. The achalasia subgroup of the CCv4.0 Working Group developed both conclusive and inconclusive statements for the HRM diagnoses of achalasia subtypes. Conclusive achalasia on HRM is defined as an abnormal median integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) in the primary position of wet swallows along with 100% failed peristalsis, with type I achalasia having 100% failed peristalsis without panesophageal pressurization (PEP), type II achalasia with PEP in at least 20% of swallows, and type III achalasia having at least 20% of swallows premature with no appreciable peristalsis. An inconclusive HRM diagnosis of achalasia can arise when there is an integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) that is borderline or at the upper limit of normal in at least one position, there is an abnormal IRP in both positions but evidence of peristalsis with PEP or premature swallows, or there is peristalsis in the secondary position after apparent achalasia in the primary position. In patients with dysphagia and an inconclusive HRM diagnosis of achalasia, supportive testing beyond HRM such as a timed barium esophagram (TBE) for functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) is recommended. The review recommends a diagnostic algorithm for achalasia, discusses therapeutic options for the disease, and outlines future needs on this topic.

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive tests for Barrett's esophagus (BE) detection have raised the prospect of broader nonreflux-based testing. Cost-effectiveness studies have largely studied men aged 50 years with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms. We evaluated the comparative cost effectiveness of BE screening tests in GERD-based and GERD-independent testing scenarios. METHODS: Markov modeling was performed in 3 scenarios in 50 years old individuals: (i) White men with chronic GERD (GERD-based); (ii) GERD-independent (all races, men and women), BE prevalence 1.6%; and (iii) GERD-independent, BE prevalence 5%. The simulation compared multiple screening strategies with no screening: sedated endoscopy (sEGD), transnasal endoscopy, swallowable esophageal cell collection devices with biomarkers, and exhaled volatile organic compounds. A hypothetical cohort of 500,000 individuals followed for 40 years using a willingness to pay threshold of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) was simulated. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) comparing each strategy with no screening and comparing screening strategies with each other were calculated. RESULTS: In both GERD-independent scenarios, most non-sEGD BE screening tests were cost effective. Swallowable esophageal cell collection devices with biomarkers were cost effective (<$35,000/QALY) and were the optimal screening tests in all scenarios. Exhaled volatile organic compounds had the highest ICERs in all scenarios. ICERs were low (<$25,000/QALY) for all tests in the GERD-based scenario, and all non-sEGD tests dominated no screening. ICERs were sensitive to BE prevalence and test costs. DISCUSSION: Minimally invasive nonendoscopic tests may make GERD-independent BE screening cost effective. Participation rates for these strategies need to be studied.

Introduction Visceral obesity is associated with GERD and, traditionally, it has been assumed that visceral fat predisposes to GERD primarily by increasing intra‐abdominal pressure. However, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of esophageal biopsies from obese individuals without GERD exhibit dilated intercellular spaces (DIS) and, in earlier studies, we found that substances secreted by mature adipocytes in visceral fat from obese patients impair esophageal epithelial barrier function, induce DIS and reduce transepithelial resistance (TER). There is a fat pad at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) that is in intimate contact with the distal esophagus. We now explore whether whole GEJ fat tissue of obese individuals secretes substances that impair esophageal barrier function. Methods We obtained GEJ fat from 3 obese (BMI 46, 60, 74) and 3 non‐obese (BMI 24, 26, 27) patients having foregut surgery. Human esophageal squamous cells were seeded into transwells and grown to confluence for 3 days. On day 4, cells were raised to an air‐liquid interface (ALI) to allow for differentiation, stratification, and esophageal barrier formation. ALI cultures were exposed to conditioned media (CM) from GEJ fat or to control medium beginning at day 4. TER was measured on days 4, 6, and 8 using the EVOM2 Epithelial Volt/Ohm Meter. On day 8, ALI cultures were stained with H&E and Ki‐67 and imaged; barrier permeability was assessed by a biotinylation reagent applied to the ALI surface. TEM of ALIs and of esophageal biopsies from 2 non‐obese and 2 obese patients without GERD were assessed. Results CM from all 3 obese patients significantly reduced TER on days 6 and 8; CM from 2 non‐obese patients did not reduce TER whereas CM from 1 non‐obese patient induced a slight reduction in TER at day 8 (Table 1). Marked DIS were found only in ALI cultures grown with CM from obese patients. In ALIs grown with CM from non‐obese patients, the biotinylation reagent stopped at the superficial layers of esophageal cells. In contrast, the biotinylation reagent diffused through all cell layers in ALIs grown with obese patient CM. Increases in basaloid cells and in Ki‐67 were found in ALIs grown with obese patient CM. TEMs of ALIs grown with non‐obese patient CM demonstrated well‐oriented cell‐cell junctions similar to TEMs of non‐obese patient esophageal biopsies. In contrast, ALIs grown with obese patient CM demonstrated cell‐cell junctional structures that were disorganized, aggregated, and floating within the DIS, similar in appearance to TEMs of the obese patients’ esophageal biopsies. Conclusion Substances produced by GEJ fat of obese patients impair esophageal epithelial barrier integrity, cause basal cell hyperplasia and DIS, and disrupt intercellular connections. These findings in ALI cultures recapitulate abnormalities seen by TEM in esophageal biopsies of obese patients.