Katzka, David A.

Introduction: Young-onset esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) often presents at advanced stages and is associated with poor outcomes. We aimed to examine the epidemiology of young-onset Barrett’s esophagus (BE) using the TriNetX database. Methods: Young-onset BE patients (age 18 to younger than 50 y) with esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) within 1 year before index BE diagnosis between 2014 and 2023 were included. Negative binomial regression was used to evaluate incident-time trends, and logistic regression to assess for independent predictors of young-onset BE. Results: BE diagnosis was present in 76,691 (3.3%) of 2,337,786 patients that underwent EGD, of which 14,120 (18%) had prevalent young-onset BE. BE dysplasia/EAC was present in 6% of young-onset patients at initial diagnosis. Conventional BE risk factors also predicted young-onset BE: GERD (OR=2.4), White race (OR=2.4), male sex (OR=2.2), smoking (OR=1.2), and obesity (OR=1.1). Each additional risk factor increased the probability of BE prevalence by 74% in young patients versus 54% in older patients. The prevalence of young-onset BE was 4.5% with GERD and ≥3 additional risk factors, and 2.3% when ≥3 risk factors were present. Discussion: Young-onset BE accounts for 18% of all BE cases, demonstrates a striking 6% rate of dysplasia/neoplasia at initial diagnosis, and has a prevalence of 4.5% in those with GERD and ≥3 risk factors. These findings suggest that young-onset BE is an important patient population that merits further study. Additional studies are necessary to study the cost-effectiveness of BE screening in younger patients with multiple risk factors.

INTRODUCTION: The adjunctive use of p53 immunohistochemistry has been proposed as a potential tool to improve risk stratification in Barrett's esophagus (BE) with conflicting results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the performance of p53 in predicting progression to advanced neoplasia (high-grade dysplasia [HGD] and esophageal adenocarcinoma [EAC]) among patients with BE. METHODS: We searched multiple databases for studies that evaluated the use of aberrant p53 in esophageal biopsies among patients with BE and reported progression rates to HGD/EAC. The outcomes were p53 test characteristics and incidence and risk ratio (RR) for progression to HGD/EAC in patients with and without aberrant p53 using random effects models. RESULTS: Among the 27 included studies, the proportion of patients with aberrant p53 expression at baseline was 20% (95% CI: 14%, 27%). The rate of progression with and without aberrant p53 was 8 per 100 person-years (95% CI: 6, 11) and 0.3 per 100 person-years (95% CI: 0.1, 0.6), respectively. Compared with patients without aberrant p53 expression, those with aberrant p53 had a higher risk for progression to HGD/EAC in cohort studies (RR = 10.2 [95% CI: 6.9, 15.0]) and case control studies (RR = 3.3 [95% CI: 2.5, 4.4]). The sensitivity for progression for non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus and low-grade dysplasia/indefinite for dysplasia was 42% and 77% and specificity was 96% and 76%, respectively. DISCUSSION: While aberrant p53 expression has been associated with an increased risk of progression to advanced neoplasia in patients with BE undergoing surveillance, the diagnostic characteristics are suboptimal precluding uniform clinical adoption. Prospective studies with standardized grading protocols are needed to determine whether p53-guided surveillance strategies can meaningfully improve patient outcomes.

Summary Central obesity is a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) independent of acid reflux. However, about a quarter of patients with Barrett’s esophagus (BE) and EAC have a normal body mass index (BMI). One hypothesis is that chronic systemic inflammation is as critical to the cancer pathway than the BMI alone. Therefore, we hypothesized that lean patients with BE/EAC would have a high prevalence of metabolic diseases. We aimed to compare metabolic diseases among lean patients with BE/EAC and overweight/obese BE/EAC and lean control without BE/EAC. We performed a propensity score–matched case–control study including patients with BE/EAC and a control group without BE/EAC from the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP). The groups were compared using chi-square χ 2 and Student t-test as appropriate. Adjusted logistic regression models were used to compare the association with metabolic diseases. We included a total of 2504 patients (631 EAC, 621 BE, and 1252 controls). A quarter of patients (24.6%) with BE/EAC were lean. When compared to controls without BE/EAC, lean patients with BE were more likely to have diabetes (32.2% vs. 11.2%, P < 0.001) and hyperlipidemia (76.2% vs. 53%, P < 0.001). When comparing lean EAC patients to controls without BE/EAC, lean patients had a higher association with smoking (73.3% vs. 58.6%, P: 0.002) and diabetes (18.7% vs. 11.2%, P: 0.03). When compared to overweight/obese BE patients, lean BE were less likely to have NASH (7.7% vs. 20.3%, P: 0.001), diabetes (32.3% vs. 42.1%, P: 0.03), hyperlipidemia (77.2% vs. 87%, P: 0.003), and metabolic syndrome (24% vs. 54%, P < 0.001). Similarly, when compared to overweight/obese patients with EAC, lean EAC patients were less likely to have NASH (0% vs. 15.5%, P < 0.001), diabetes (18.7% vs. 34.1%, P < 0.001), hyperlipidemia (37.3% vs. 51.8%, P: 0.002), hypertension (37.3% vs. 55.3%, P < 0.001), and metabolic syndrome (8% vs. 37.6%, P < 0.001). A quarter of patients with BE/EAC are lean. Although lean BE/EAC patients have a more favorable metabolic profile compared to overweight/obese BE/EAC patients, diabetes and smoking are more common among lean patients with EAC compared to lean controls. The higher association with smoking and diabetes among lean EAC challenges traditional risk factor paradigms, suggesting a significant role for insulin resistance and chronic inflammation in EAC pathogenesis, especially in patients without typical risk factors. BMI-determined obesity may need to be supplemented with inflammatory metabolic diseases to improve assessment of BE/EAC risk in lean patients.

ABSTRACT Background Obesity affects over 40% of the US population and contributes to worse outcomes in a variety of diseases and disorders. Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists have drawn attention for their impact on obesity. With a dense population of receptors throughout the gastrointestinal tract, it is critical to understand the way that glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists impact gastrointestinal diseases and disorders. Aims To evaluate the expanding role of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists in the management of obesity and gastrointestinal disease, with a focus on therapeutic applications, impact on gastrointestinal cancers, safety profile, and implications for gastroenterology practice. Methods We conducted a narrative review of recent clinical trials, cohort studies, and guideline updates through 2025. Evidence was synthesised on efficacy, safety, and clinical implications across gastrointestinal disorders including steatotic liver disease, gastroesophageal reflux, inflammatory bowel disease, short bowel syndrome, and obesity‐associated cancers. Results Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists induce substantial and durable weight loss and improve obesity‐related gastrointestinal outcomes. They are approved for steatotic liver disease, with demonstrated histologic and biochemical benefits. Evidence suggests a reduced incidence of several gastrointestinal cancers. The most common adverse events include nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, constipation, and delayed gastric emptying, which may affect peri‐endoscopic management. Discontinuation rates remain substantial but can be mitigated by careful titration and specialist oversight. Conclusions Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists are a critical therapy for obesity and several related gastrointestinal conditions. Gastroenterologists are uniquely positioned to optimize their use, manage adverse events, coordinate multidisciplinary care, and ensure safe and effective integration into practice.

Background Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is a food allergen-induced inflammatory disorder characterised by interleukin (IL)-13-mediated oesophageal inflammation and epithelial basal cell hyperplasia (BCH). The role of mitochondria in EoE pathogenesis remains elusive. Design Prompted by single cell transcriptomics data, we interrogated the role of mitochondria in EoE pathobiology using patient biopsies, EoE-mouse models and oesophageal epithelial cells grown in monolayer and three-dimensional (3D) organoid cultures treated with EoE-relevant cytokines. 3D organoids and EoE-bearing mice were treated with omeprazole—a proton-pump inhibitor used as first-line EoE therapy. We performed CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) interference in mouse organoids to identify the key mitochondrial regulatory genes whose depletion may lead to BCH. We analysed mitochondrial membrane potential, mass and superoxide production by flow cytometry, cellular oxygen consumption by respirometry, mitochondrial structures and perturbation of cellular energy homeostasis by immunoblotting. Results Mitochondrial dysfunction appeared to be a hallmark of EoE-related BCH where mitochondrial structural damage was associated with impaired oxidative respiratory capacity, elevation of mitochondrial superoxide and decreased adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production, as corroborated by activation of the adenosine monophosphate (AMP) -activated protein kinase and suppression of mammalian target-of-rapamycin signalling. Depletion of PGC1A, the master regulator of mitochondria biogenesis, recapitulated EoE-related BCH, suggesting that mitochondrial dysfunction drives BCH. Further, omeprazole alleviated mitochondrial damage and dysfunction in EoE-related BCH modelled in mice and patient-derived organoids. Conclusion Mitochondrial dysfunction is tightly linked to perturbation of redox homeostasis in EoE-related BCH, which is promoted by IL-13 and reversible with omeprazole treatment.

Minimally invasive esophageal cellular collection devices such as the Capsule Sponge may offer the potential for targeted screening of high-risk patients. The capsule sponge has been shown to be a safe, accurate and effective means of detecting Barrett’s esophagus. Here, we explore two potential real-life scenarios that could occur in a future screening or case finding programme. Firstly, when the capsule sponge test result is positive but confirmatory endoscopy demonstrates <1cm of columnar epithelium and secondly when subsequent endoscopy identifies gastric intestinal neoplasia. We discuss the clinical implication of the result and suggest how these patients could potentially be followed up in the future.

INTRODUCTION: The risk of progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus (BE) increases with advancing degrees of dysplasia. There is a critical need to improve the diagnosis of BE dysplasia, given substantial interobserver variability and overcalls of dysplasia during manual community pathologist reads. We aimed to externally validate a previously cross-validated BE dysplasia diagnosis deep learning model (BEDDLM) that predicts dysplasia grade on whole slide images (WSIs). METHODS: We digitized nondysplastic BE (NDBE), low-grade (LGD), and high-grade dysplasia (HGD) histology slides from 3 external academic centers. A consensus read by 2 expert study pathologists was used as the criterion standard. Slide stain characteristics were normalized using cycle-generative adversarial networks. WSIs were assessed by BEDDLM using an ensemble approach, combining a “You Only Look Once” model followed by a ResNet101 classifier model. RESULTS: We included 489 WSIs. Consensus histopathology revealed 232 NDBE, 117 LGD, and 140 HGD WSIs. The mean age (SD) was 66.9 (11.4) years; 413 (84.7%) were men. Using the BEDDLM ensemble model, sensitivity and specificity for NDBE were 73.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 67.09%–78.85%) and 93.4% (95% CI: 89.62%–96.10%); for LGD, 84.6% (95% CI: 76.78%–90.62%) and 80.6% (95% CI: 76.26%–84.54%); and for HGD, 80.7% (95% CI: 73.19%–86.89%) and 94.8% (95% CI: 91.97%–96.91%), respectively. The F1 score was 0.81, 0 0.69, and 0.83 for NDBE, LGD, and HGD, respectively. DISCUSSION: Our externally validated deep learning model demonstrates substantial accuracy for the diagnosis of BE dysplasia grade on WSIs.

INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines recommend endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's esophagus (BE) but do not account for competing mortality unrelated to esophageal cancer (EC). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate EC and non-EC mortality risk in BE patients. METHODS: We searched multiple databases for studies reporting mortality in BE. We included population-based studies providing standardized mortality ratio (SMR). The primary outcome was SMR from all causes and EC and non-EC etiologies. SMR was calculated by dividing the observed mortality over the expected mortality. Logarithmic form of SMRs was pooled using random-effects model. RESULTS: Our search yielded 2,826 articles, of which 7 studies (n = 34,454) were included. All-cause mortality was elevated in BE patients compared with population controls (pooled SMR 1.24, 95% confident interval [CI] 1.01–1.53) driven in part by increased EC mortality risk (SMR 8.98, 95 CI 5.12–15.77). The mortality risk was still increased but attenuated after excluding EC mortality (SMR 1.21, 95% CI 1–1.46). There was no increased mortality risk of non-EC malignancies (SMR 1.22, 95% CI 0.82–1.82) or mortality due to noncancer etiologies (SMR 1.13, 95% CI 0.90–1.43). Death due to cardiovascular diseases was higher in BE (SMR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02–1.33). BE patients were 10 times more likely to die from noncancer etiologies than EC (risk ratio 10.71, 95% CI 5.98–19.16). Subgroup analysis of studies that excluded prevalent EC at baseline (3 studies) also showed increased all-cause (SMR 1.12, 95% CI 1.07–1.18) and EC mortality (SMR 4.7, 95% CI 3.58–6.17) among BE patients. DISCUSSION: BE patients exhibit a higher all-cause mortality, driven in part by risk of EC mortality. A personalized approach to surveillance, mitigating risk of EC while recognizing the broader mortality risks, is warranted.