Shin, Andrea

Background: In patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C), rapid, sustained relief from constipation and abdominal symptoms, such as pain, discomfort, and bloating, can improve quality of life. Objective: This post hoc analysis evaluates the time to constipation and abdominal symptom relief achieved with tenapanor. Design: Post hoc analysis of data pooled from three randomized placebo-controlled studies (phase IIb, T3MPO-1, and T3MPO-2) of tenapanor 50 mg twice daily in patients with IBS-C. Methods: The time to first response for complete spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM) frequency, abdominal pain, discomfort, bloating, and 3-item abdominal score (AS3) were assessed. The AS3 was derived as the average of the weekly scores for abdominal pain, discomfort, and bloating. Cumulative incidences of response over time were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the effect of baseline and demographic characteristics on the time to first response. Results: Among 1372 patients with IBS-C (684 tenapanor; 688 placebo), median time to first CSBM response was 2 weeks, and median time to abdominal pain, discomfort, bloating, or AS3 response was 4–5 weeks in those treated with tenapanor, with 67.8%–76.7% achieving first response in CSBM frequency and abdominal symptoms by week 12. These time frames were shorter than those observed with the placebo (4 weeks for CSBM and 6–8 weeks for pain, discomfort, bloating, and AS3), of whom 59.1%–69.4% achieved the first response in CSBM and abdominal symptoms by week 12. Higher weekly response rates were observed with tenapanor than with placebo for all endpoints in each week of the 12-week treatment period. Conclusion: This novel post hoc analysis demonstrates that, compared with placebo, tenapanor reduces the time to first response in CSBM frequency and abdominal symptoms and consistently increases the weekly response rate during 12 weeks of treatment. Trial registration: NCT01923428; NCT02621892; NCT02686138.

AbstractBackgroundNumerous individual and environmental factors including diet may play an important role in the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). It is unclear to what degree dietary intake is affected in individuals with IBS. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta‐analysis to summarize dietary intake of adults with IBS and to compare dietary intake between adults with IBS and non‐IBS controls.MethodsOvid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Scopus were searched through February 2023 for clinical trials and observational studies measuring usual diet in adults with IBS. Pooled weighted averages were estimated for total energy, macronutrient, and micronutrient data. Mean differences (MD) in nutrient intake were estimated for adults with IBS versus non‐IBS controls using a random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by the inconsistency index (I2).Key ResultsSixty‐three full‐text articles were included in the review of which 29 studies included both IBS and control subjects. Nutrients not meeting the recommended intake level for any dietary reference values in the IBS population were fiber and vitamin D. Meta‐regression by female proportion was positively correlated with total fat intake and negatively correlated with carbohydrate intake. Comparisons between participants with IBS and controls showed significantly lower fiber intake in participants with IBS with high heterogeneity (MD: −1.8; 95% CI: −3.0, −0.6; I2 = 85%).Conclusions and InferencesThis review suggests that fiber and vitamin D intake is suboptimal in IBS; however, overall dietary intake does not appear to be comprised. Causes and consequences of reduced fiber in IBS deserve further study.Results of this systematic review and meta‐analysis suggest that fiber and vitamin D intake is suboptimal in IBS. However, overall intake of other macro‐ and micronutrients does not appear to be compromised. Causes and consequences of reduced fiber and Vitamin D intake in IBS deserve further study.

Abstract Background There is little information regarding gender‐specific measurements of colonic transit and anorectal function in patients with defecation disorders ( DD ). To compare overall colonic transit by gender in DD . Methods In 407 patients with constipation due to DD diagnosed by a single gastroenterologist (1994–2012), DD was characterized by anorectal manometry, balloon expulsion test, and colonic transit by scintigraphy. The primary endpoint was overall colonic transit (geometric center, GC ) at 24 h ( GC 24). Effects of gender in DD on colonic transit, and comparison with transit in 208 healthy controls were assessed by Mann–Whitney rank sum test. Secondary endpoints were maximum anal resting ( ARP ) and squeeze ( ASP ) pressures. We also tested association of the physiological endpoints among DD females by pregnancy history and among DD patients by colectomy history. Key Results The DD patients were 67 males (M) and 340 females (F). Significant differences by gender in DD patients were observed in GC 24 (median: M: 2.2; F: 1.8; P = 0.01), ARP (median: M: 87.8 mmHg; F: 82.4 mmHg; P = 0.04), and ASP (median: M: 182.4 mmHg; F: 128.7 mmHg; P < 0.001). GC 24 was slower in DD compared with same‐gender healthy controls. GC 24 did not differ among DD females by pregnancy history. Anorectal functions and upper GI transit did not differ among DD patients by colectomy history. Conclusions & Inferences Patients with DD have slower colonic transit compared with gender‐matched controls. Among DD patients, males have higher ARP and ASP , and females have slower colonic transit. Although the clinical significance of these differences may be unclear, findings suggest that interpretation of these tests in suspected DD should be based on same‐gender control data.

SummaryBackgroundTapentadol is a mu‐opioid receptor agonist and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. In clinical trials, tapentadol provided somatic pain relief comparable to mu‐opioids such as oxycodone, with significantly less gastrointestinal adverse effects. The acute effects of tapentadol on gastrointestinal and colonic transit are unclear.AimTo compare acute effects of oral tapentadol and oxycodone on gastric, small bowel and colonic transit of solids in 38 healthy human subjects.MethodsIn a randomised, parallel‐group, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study of the effects of identical‐appearing tapentadol immediate release (IR), 75 mg t.d.s., or oxycodone IR, 5 mg t.d.s., for 48 h, we measured gastric (GE), small bowel (SBT measured as colonic filling at 6 h) and colonic transit by validated scintigraphy. Drug was commenced on the evening before the start of the transit test. The primary endpoints were overall colonic transit (geometric centre, GC) at 24 h and GE half‐time (t1/2). ancova of transit data included gender or BMI as covariates. Adverse effects were summarised.ResultsAt the doses tested, oxycodone and tapentadol significantly delayed GE t1/2 and SBT, but not overall colonic transit, compared to placebo. Transit profiles in all regions were not significantly different between oxycodone and tapentadol at the doses tested. Both oxycodone and tapentadol were associated with nausea and central effects attributable to central opiate effects.ConclusionsTapentadol significantly delayed gastric emptying t1/2 and small bowel transit, similar to oxycodone. These data suggest that acute administration of tapentadol may not have significant advantages over standard mu‐opioids, in terms of the potential to avoid upper gastrointestinal motor dysfunction.