Back to Authors

Reither, Rachel

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 2

MC210807: Phase 1 clinical trial assessing the safety and efficacy of onvansertib, a novel, oral, PLK1 inhibitor in Relapsed/Refractory myeloproliferative chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML).
Mangaonkar, Abhishek A. , Geyer, Susan M. , Burgess, Ashya, Rice, Kimberly, Asmus, E.J., Koenig, Patricia, Lasho, Terra, Finke, Christy M. , Reither, Rachel, Al‐Kali, Aref , Fernández-Zapico, Martín E. , Patnaik, Mrinal M. , McCullough, Kristen , Rice, Kimberly, Lasho, Terra, Carr, Ryan M , Fernandez, Jenna , Saliba, Antoine N.

Blood | December 5, 2025 | Volume: 146 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 5634-5634

10.1182/blood-2025-5634 Get It

Abstract BACKGROUND: DNA methyltransferase inhibition offers palliative benefit but does not alter disease biology. in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML, Merlevede J et al. Nat Comm 2016). This was conclusively demonstrated in the phase 3 DACOTA study, where decitabine did not improve event-free survival in comparison to hydroxyurea (median 12.1 versus 10.3 months, P=0.27) in advanced myeloproliferative CMML (MP-CMML). Hence, there is in urgent need to develop disease modifying therapies for this dismal condition. We and others have demonstrated a role for RAS mutations in MP-CMML through the activation of the KMT2A-PLK1 axis. Targeting of this axis using onvansertib, an inhibitor of PLK1, has demonstrated its pre-clinical efficacy in MP-CMML patient-derived organoid and xenograft models. (Carr RM et al. Nat Comm 2021). METHODS: We conducted a single center phase 1 study to assess the safety and efficacy of onvansertib in relapsed/refractory MP-CMML (NCT05549661). We used a Bayesian Optimal Interval (BOIN) study design to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The three dose cohorts included 6, 9 and 12 mg/m2 given orally from days 1 to 21 of each 28-day cycle. Key inclusion criteria included a WHO-defined diagnosis of MP-CMML with a white blood cell (WBC) count > 13,000/mm3 and adequate organ function (estimated GFR > 50 mL/min/m2). Response was evaluated per the MDS/MPN International Working Group Criteria (Savona et al. Blood 2015). Targeting efficacy was assessed by measuring phosphorylation of TCTP (a PLK1 substrate), specifically pTCTP/TCTP ratios by immunoblotting in peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples pre and post cycle 1 (Days 1, 7, 21) and end of cycle 3. Pharmacokinetic studies and translational correlative studies were conducted per protocol. RESULTS: Between April 2023 and July 2025, a total of 9 patients were enrolled. The median age at enrollment was 68 years (range: 60-83); all caucasian with 4 (44%) males. All patients had a diagnosis of CMML-1 with a median bone marrow (BM) blast percentage of 4 (0-9), median hemoglobin 10 (7.1-13.2) g/dL, median WBC count of 11.1 (3.1-72.7) x 109/L (4 patients had a WBC count < 13 x 109/L at enrollment due to hydroxyurea use but were confirmed to be MP-CMML at diagnosis), absolute monocyte count 2.1 (1.9-19.6) x 109/L, and platelet count of 36 (20-494) x 109/L. TET2 (89%), SRSF2 (78%), ASXL1 (56%), NRAS, KRAS and CBL (22% each) were the most frequent molecular abnormalities. Previous therapies included hydroxyurea (n=8) and decitabine (n=1). Four patients were enrolled at the 6mg/m2dose level, 2 at the 9 mg/m2 dose level and we currently have one patient at the 12 mg/m2 dose level. While there were 2 planned patients at the 6 mg/m2 dose level, due to a case of pericardial effusion that was possibly drug related, an additional two patients were enrolled at the same dose level, without any dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Targeting efficacy was confirmed by pTCTP immunoblotting in PBMC samples from 4 patients (6 and 9 mg/m2 dose levels) showing suppressed pTCTP/TCTP ratios. No confirmed DLT has been identified thus far, and no grade 3 or 4 toxicities attributable to the study drug have been reported. Possible or unrelated grade 3 adverse effects included infections (sepsis/cellulitis, n=2, 22%), acute kidney injury (n=1, 11%), pericardial effusion (n=1, 11%), and atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response (n=1, 11%). Median duration on therapy was 124 (range: 15-654) days with most common cause of study discontinuation being disease progression (33%). Response was assessed as per the MDS/MPN IWG criteria in patients who received at least 1 cycle (n=8) with 3 (38%) patients meeting criteria for either hematological or optimal marrow response. Specifically, there was one (14%) patient with >100% platelet response, one (14%) with normalization of WBC count (baseline WBC count >50 x 109/L), one (14%) optimal marrow response with BM blast% reduction from 8 to 2, facilitating candidacy for an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and three patients (38%) remained as stable disease. CONCLUSION: In MP-CMML, PLK1 inhibition with onvansertib is relatively well tolerated and shows preliminary efficacy in approximately 40% of patients, with one patient having an optimal marrow response at the 9 mg/m2 dose. Future directions include a dose expansion phase and studying upfront combination with DNA methyltransferase inhibitors.
Phenotypic landscape and clinical outcomes associated with promotor TERT mutations in patients with telomere biology disorders
Franke, Madeline , Lasho, Terra, Mangaonkar, Abhishek A. , Finke, Christy M. , Kusne, Yael , Reither, Rachel, Patnaik, Mrinal M. , Ferrer, Alejandro

Blood | December 4, 2025 | Volume: 146 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 4995-4995

10.1182/blood-2025-4995 Get It

Abstract Introduction: TERT promoter (pTERT) variants are among the most frequent genetic alterations in human cancers, where they drive oncogenesis through telomerase reactivation. However, somatic, pathogenic pTERT variants have also been seen in non-cancerous conditions such as telomere biology disorders (TBD), where they attempt to rescue the bone marrow failure phenotype (adaptive compensation). We conducted this study to assess the phenotype and outcomes of pTERT mutations in TBD patients. Methods: After IRB approval, the Mayo Clinic institutional TBD database was queried to identify all patients with somatic pTERT mutations. We have designed a customized error corrected sequencing panel that covers somatic mutations (52 genes) associated with adaptive and maladaptive outcomes in TBD patients. This covers the promoter region for TERT and can detect variants down to 0.5% variant allele fraction (VAF) with 10,000 X sequencing depth. Clinical data was retrospectively abstracted. Results: We identified 7 pTERT variants (3 hotspots) in 6 (two females (33%), mean age 61 years, 4 alive). The three hotspots were: (1) c.-57A>C (2 individuals, mean VAF 17.1%; range 11.6%-22.6%), (2) c.-124C>T (4 individuals, mean VAF 12.9%; range 1.9%-41.3%), and (3) c.-146C>T (1 individual, VAF 1.2%). One individual had both the c.-124C>T (VAF 41.3%) and the c.-146C>T somatic pTERT variants, occurring in the context of a germline TERT variant. The median VAF for all 7 pTERT variants was 6.1% (range 1.2%-41.3%). The hotspot, c.-57A>C, occurred in the context of pathogenic germline TERT (VAF 49.9%) variants with pathogenic somatic co-variants in PPM1D (avg. VAF 1.5%). The second hotspot, c.-124C>T, occurred in the context of germline TERT (avg. VAF 49.6%) and RTEL1 (VAF 47.3%) variants with pathogenic somatic co-variants including ASXL1 (VAF 1%), DNMT3A (VAF 8%), and PPM1D (VAF 4%). Five of six assessable patients with pTERT variants had shortened telomere lengths (TL), with results pending for one individual. Among those with the c.-57A>C variant, granulocyte TLs were at or below the 10th percentile, while lymphocyte TLs were below the 10th percentile in one patient and below the 1st percentile in another. For those with the c.-124C>T variant, all granulocyte TLs were below the 1st percentile. Lymphocyte TLs in this group included one at the 10th percentile and two at or below the 1st percentile. The median follow up for all patients was 2 years. Hotspot 1 (c.-57A>C) variants were associated with normocellular bone marrow biopsies with one patient having normal blood counts and the other having chronic macrocytic anemia (grade 2) and thrombocytopenia (< grade 1). In patients with hotspot 2 and 3 somatic variants, bone marrow cellularity ranged from 15–50% (1 patient had grade 2-3 hypocellularity), with normal bone marrow morphology, except for polytypic plasma cells (10–15%) identified in a patient with IgG kappa multiple myeloma (currently MRD negative on maintenance therapy). This patient also had a history of head and neck cancer and follicular lymphoma. Of these four patients, only one had normal blood counts (co-occurring c.-146C>T variant); the rest had cytopenias (n=3, the worst being grade 2 thrombocytopenia), progressive macrocytosis (n=3), or eosinophilia (n=1). Comorbidities encountered in these patients included myasthenia gravis (1), hypogonadism (1), and sarcoidosis (1). Moreover, four patients (2 each for hotspots 1 and 2) presented with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, while liver fibrosis was seen in 4 patients (also 2 each for hotspots 1 and 2). At last follow up, none of these patients had documented progression to myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia. Conclusions: We describe the spectrum and clinical features of somatic pTERT mutations in TBD patients. pTERT mutations involved the following hotspot regions, c.-124C>T, c.-146C>T, and c.-57A>C, and co-occurred with other somatic variants (i.e., PPM1D and DNMT3A). None of the 6 patients with pTERT mutations had a severe bone marrow failure phenotype or developed myeloid neoplasms at last follow up, exemplifying a unique mechanism of adaptive somatic rescue.