Yehia, Asmaa

Background: Lithium, the gold standard treatment of bipolar disorder (BD), is thought to cause nephropathy in long-term users. However, the role of confounding variables linked to BD in exerting this adverse effect remains unclear. Objectives: This paper evaluates kidney function in patients with affective disorders who are taking lithium compared to patients not on lithium treatment. Design: This article is a systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources and methods: A comprehensive search of publications up to October 2023 within Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases was performed. Three assessors screened and extracted data from eligible observational studies. Risk of bias assessment was done with the ROBINS-E tool. Eligible studies were comparative studies of adult patients with diagnoses of affective disorders, including BD on lithium, with control groups not on lithium, reporting kidney function outcomes. Results: Mean estimated Glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) showed less favorable outcomes in the lithium group compared to the non-lithium group ( n = 1622, MD = −11.14 ml/min/1.73 m 2 , 95% CI: −16.61, −5.68, I 2 = 86%). The mean annual eGFR decline comparison favored the non-lithium group ( n = 13,280, MD = 0.13 ml/min/1.73 m 2 , 95% CI: 0.06, 0.20, I 2 = 0%). Serum creatinine concentration (mg/dl) was found to be higher in the lithium compared to non-lithium groups ( n = = 1704, MD = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.07, I 2 = 3%). New or progressing chronic kidney disease events were not found to be statistically different between the lithium and control groups ( n = = 17,740, OR = 2.16, 95% CI: 0.59, 7.94, I 2 = 99%). The high heterogeneity in this meta-analysis limits the reliability and interpretability of our results. Conclusion: Kidney function, as measured by eGFR, was decreased in the lithium-taking groups versus the non-lithium groups. Continuous monitoring and discussion of risks and benefits with patients, especially those with a baseline of reduced kidney function, is imperative. Trial registration: This review was registered prospectively with PROSPERO (CRD42024517414).

Post-COVID syndrome comprises persistent neuropsychiatric manifestations for more than 12 weeks after recovery from acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, yet its underlying pathophysiology is unclear. Ferroptosis, an iron-dependent form of cell death with three hallmarks, iron dysregulation, antioxidant failure, and lipid peroxidation, seems to be involved in COVID-19/post-COVID-19 pathophysiology. Here, we administered the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S1 subunit intranasally to K18-hACE2 transgenic mice and quantified ferroptotic marker protein expression in four brain regions (hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, cerebellum, and olfactory bulb) at 2, 6, and 12 weeks post-administration, alongside ultrastructural assessment by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) that was limited to the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. Two-way ANOVA revealed region- and time-dependent modulation of iron-handling, antioxidant, and lipid peroxidation markers. In the hippocampus, FPN1 was significantly increased at 2 weeks, while TFR1 showed a time-dependent pattern without significant week-specific differences. In the prefrontal cortex, DMT1 significantly increased at 2 weeks, and GPx4 showed an overall treatment effect with a trend of increase at 6 weeks. The cerebellum exhibited early increases in FPN1 and GPx4 and a delayed increase in MDA-conjugated proteins. In the olfactory bulb, FPN1 increased at 12 weeks, with GPx4 showing an overall treatment effect and an early trend of decrease. TEM identified ferroptosis-consistent features in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex at all time points. These findings suggest that spike protein exposure may be associated with time-dependent and brain-region-specific alterations of ferroptosis-related markers. These preliminary findings are based on a limited sample size, which needs further research to elucidate the clinical implication and to study the mechanism in more depth as well as future validation with pharmacological inhibitors.

Background: The effect of intrauterine exposure to SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy on neurodevelopment and growth trajectories during the first year of life remains under investigation. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of all pregnant women who received care at Mayo Health System and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR) from March 2020 through October 2021 and examined the effects of fetal sex and trimester of maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection on the risk of neurodevelopmental disorder diagnosis and growth trajectories of head circumference (HC) and body weight (BW) percentiles over the first year of life using linear mixed models. Results: We observed that a higher percentage of male infants (n = 357), compared to females (n = 344), have neurodevelopmental disorders (10.9% vs. 5.2%, p = 0.008), and infants exposed to maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection in the second (n = 183) or third trimester (n = 358) have a higher prevalence of neurological diagnoses compared to those exposed in the first trimester (n = 160) (1st vs. 2nd vs. 3rd trimester: 0% vs. 0.9% vs. 0.7%, respectively, p = 0.037). In addition, female infants, compared to males, had significantly lower BW (B = −0.04, p < 0.0001) and HC (B = −0.06, p < 0.0001) percentile growth trajectories over the first year of life. Moreover, infants exposed to maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection in the second trimester had a significantly lower BW percentile growth trajectory (B = −0.01, p = 0.006), while infants exposed to maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection in the third trimester had a significantly lower HC percentile growth trajectory (B = −0.02, p = 0.02). Conclusions: In utero exposure to maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection could have long-term effects on growth trajectories, depending on the infant’s sex and timing of exposure.

Background: The potential long-term effects of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection on the brain structure have not yet been fully elucidated. Even though existing studies have reported structural changes in the post-COVID-19 period, the results remain highly inconsistent and controversial. As such, identifying an imaging biomarker for post-COVID brains is still under investigation. This review aims to comprehensively summarize the structural MRI (sMRI) studies that focus on volumetric brain changes at least two weeks following COVID-19 infection. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Google Scholar up to 9 September 2025. Studies that utilized sMRI to assess volumetric brain changes post-COVID at greater than two weeks following infection were included. Exclusion criteria encompassed research involving pediatric or adolescent populations and imaging modalities other than sMRI. Preprints, reviews, case reports, case series and post-mortem studies were also excluded. Results: Forty-one studies satisfied the inclusion criteria and consisted of 2895 patients and 1729 healthy controls. Despite the wide variability in image acquisition protocols, data processing methods, and comorbidities between studies, multiple studies reported statistically significant volumetric reductions in the hippocampus, amygdala, thalamus, basal ganglia, nucleus accumbens and the cerebellum months to years after infection, especially in older hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19. Conclusions: The emerging literature reports long-term volume changes across various brain regions in individuals previously infected with COVID-19; however, the evidence is inconsistent. Specific imaging biomarkers following exposure to SARS-CoV-2 infection and the underlying mechanisms of these changes are yet to be identified. Future studies with harmonized imaging protocols, longitudinal designs, and integrated biomarker and clinical data are needed to define robust biomarkers and elucidate the pathophysiology of these findings.