Back to Authors

Ho, Kalon K.L.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5946-6428

Mayo Clinic

Rush University Medical Center

Citations 3

Trends in the Association Between Age and In-Hospital Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Peterson, Eric D., Roe, Matthew T. , Spertus, John A. , Rumsfeld, John S., Anderson, H. Vernon, Klein, Lloyd W. , Holmes, David R. , Singh, Mandeep , Ou, Fang‐Shu , Ho, Kalon K.L. , Spertus, John A

Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions | February 11, 2009 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 20-26

10.1161/circinterventions.108.826172 Get It

Background— Temporal trends and contemporary data characterizing the impact of patient age on in-hospital outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions are lacking. We sought to determine the importance of age by assessing the in-hospital mortality of stratified age groups in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Methods and Results— In-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention on 1 410 069 patients was age stratified into 4 groups—group 1 (age <40, n=25 679), group 2 (40 to 59, n=496 204), group 3 (60 to 79, n=732 574), and group 4 (≥80, n=155 612)—admitted from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2006. Overall in-hospital mortality was 1.22%; in-hospital mortality was 0.60%, 0.59%, 1.26%, and 3.16% in groups 1 to 4, respectively, P <0.0001. Overall temporal improvement per calendar year in the adjusted in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention was noted in most groups; however, this finding was significant only in the 2 older age groups, group 3 (odds ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.92 to 0.96) and group 4 (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92 to 0.97). The absolute mortality reduction was greatest in the most elderly group, those over the age of 80 years. Conclusions— In-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention has fallen for all age groups over the past 6 years. However, the largest absolute reduction was seen among patients 80 years of age or older.
Clinical and Angiographic Predictors of Restenosis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
McClelland, Robyn L. , Willerson, James T., Penny, William F. , Holmes, David R. , Singh, Mandeep , Gersh, Bernard J. , Ho, Kalon K.L.

Circulation | June 7, 2004 | Volume: 109 | Issue: 22 | Pages: 2727-2731

10.1161/01.cir.0000131898.18849.65 Get It

Background— Restenosis prediction from published studies is hampered by inadequate sample size and incomplete angiographic follow-up. The prediction of restenosis with the existing variables is poor. The aim of the present study was to include the clinical and angiographic variables commonly associated with angiographic restenosis and develop a prediction model for restenosis from the PRESTO database. Methods and Results— This study included 1312 patients with a single lesion enrolled in the angiographic substudy of the PRESTO trial. We constructed 2 risk scores. The first used preprocedural variables (female gender, vessel size [≤2.5 mm, 2.5 to 3 mm, 3 to 3.5 mm, 3.5 to 4 mm, >4 mm], lesion length >20 mm, diabetes, smoking status, type C lesion, any previous percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI], and unstable angina) derived from previous studies. Estimated restenosis rates and corresponding variability for each possible level of the resultant risk score were obtained via bootstrapping techniques. The area under the receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.63, indicating modest discriminatory ability to predict restenosis. The second approach constructed a multiple logistic regression model considering significant univariate clinical and angiographic predictors of restenosis identified from the PRESTO database (treated diabetes mellitus, nonsmoker, vessel size, lesion length, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association type C lesion, ostial location, and previous PCI). The area under the ROC curve for this risk score was also 0.63. Conclusions— The preprocedural clinical and angiographic variables from available studies and from the PRESTO trial have only modest predictive ability for restenosis after PCI.
Treatment of Saphenous Vein Bypass Grafts With Ultrasound Thrombolysis
Rosenschein, Uri, Berger, Peter B. , Kuntz, Richard E., Holmes, David R. , Singh, Mandeep , Ho, Kalon K.L.

Circulation | May 12, 2003 | Volume: 107 | Issue: 18 | Pages: 2331-2336

10.1161/01.cir.0000066693.22220.30 Get It

Background— Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) with thrombus have a high frequency of distal embolization. Acolysis (therapeutic ultrasound) can break up thrombus in vitro in animal models and humans. Whether this is beneficial during percutaneous SVG interventions is unknown. Methods and Results— We performed a trial of coronary ultrasound thrombolysis in which patients with an acute coronary syndrome undergoing PCI in SVGs were randomly assigned to receive acolysis or abciximab. The primary end point was a successful procedure, defined as final luminal diameter stenosis 30% or less with Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow and freedom from major adverse cardiac events (composite of death, Q-wave, and non–Q-wave myocardial infarction [MI], emergency bypass procedure, disabling stroke, and target lesion revascularization). Of 181 enrolled, 92 received acolysis and 89 abciximab. Angiographic procedural success was achieved in 63% of acolysis patients and 82% of abciximab patients ( P =0.008). Incidence of major adverse cardiac events at 30 days was 25% with acolysis and 12% with abciximab ( P =0.036), attributable mainly to a greater frequency of non–Q-wave MI with acolysis (19.6% versus 7.9%, P =0.03). The incidence of Q-wave MI was also higher with acolysis (5.4% versus 2.2%, P =nonsignificant). The primary end point was achieved in 53.8% of acolysis patients and 73.1% of abciximab patients ( P =0.014). Conclusions— Use of therapeutic ultrasound in vein graft lesions in patients with acute coronary syndrome had poor angiographic outcome and increased the incidence of acute ischemic complications.