Al-Badri, Mina

Sex and gender influence disease mechanisms and outcomes, yet their integration into medical curricula remains limited. Faculty knowledge and confidence are essential for effective incorporation. This study assessed baseline sex- and gender-specific health (SGSH) knowledge, attitudes, and comfort among medical school educators and delivered a multi-format faculty development intervention. A survey adapted from prior SGSH assessments was distributed to medical school block leaders before the intervention, measuring SGSH knowledge, comfort differentiating sex and gender, awareness of SGSH resources, and readiness to integrate SGSH content. The intervention included virtual and in-person grand rounds, distribution of How Sex and Gender Impact Clinical Practice , and a screening of Ms. Diagnosed . Of the 103 invited to participate, 68 educators (66% response rate) completed the baseline survey. Forty percent reported no prior SGSH training, and only 13.2% felt very comfortable with SGSH concepts. Although 94.1% correctly identified gender as a social construct and sex assignment at birth, 22% remained uncomfortable distinguishing the two. More than 80% were neutral or uncomfortable identifying SGSH resources. Comfort with curriculum integration varied: 45.6% felt comfortable, 32.4% neutral, and 22.1% uncomfortable, with differences observed across specialties. These findings reveal significant gaps in medical educators’ SGSH knowledge and comfort regardless of experience, with SGSH content narrowly confined to reproductive health topics. Simply providing resources is insufficient; educators need structured guidance on integration. By outlining baseline gaps and an intervention model, this study offers a framework for institutions seeking to enhance SGSH integration through interactive, longitudinal, multi-format faculty development approaches.

Objective: Telemedicine addresses limitations in patient access, health care costs, and time spent by patients for health care visits. However, gender-based differences in patient satisfaction with this method are unclear. Our study aimed to evaluate gender-based differences in patient satisfaction for telemedicine (both video and telephone) and in-person health care visits. Methods: Patients were randomly selected to complete a patient satisfaction survey regarding their health care experiences after outpatient medical appointments at a large academic institution. Results: Of 476,777 total respondents, most patients were women (47.5%) and men (37.3%), with fewer patients in the categories transgender, other, or unknown/choose not to disclose (15.2%). Women and men were both satisfied with telemedicine by video or telephone (83.3% women versus 84.5% men rated their visit 5/5) and in-person visits (84.1% women versus 85.7% men rated their visit 5/5). Conclusions: Men and women were nearly equally satisfied with telemedicine and in-person visits, although both genders were slightly less satisfied with telemedicine video visits than in-person visits. The findings indicate that the ongoing integration of telemedicine into clinical practice could serve as a satisfactory alternative to in-person consultations for all patients.