Back to Authors

Ardila, M F Gomez

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 1

Cardiac remodeling and Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain (LV-GLS) in CKD: do advanced stages impair myocardial function?
Garzon-Dangond, J, Muslera, Eduardo Brenner, Ardila, M F Gomez, Garcia, E Tellez, Villarraga, Hector R. , Garzón-Dangond, Juan Manuel , Ardila, M F Gomez, Garcia, E Tellez

European Heart Journal | November 8, 2025 | Volume: 46 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.095 Get It

Abstract Background Global longitudinal strain (GLS) by 2D speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) has been widely utilized to detect early underlying systolic myocardial dysfunction in patients with normal ejection fraction (EF). Reduced GLS is observed in patients with hypertrophic and amyloid cardiomyopathies. However, the impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on GLS remains underexplored. CKD patients present with multiple cardiovascular comorbidities, increased left ventricular mass index (LVMI), and altered cardiac remodeling which is a dynamic and adaptive physiological response. Left ventricular (LV) remodeling is classified based on relative wall thickness (RWT ≤ or > 0.42) and LVMI (≤ or > 88 g/m² for women and ≤ or > 102 g/m² for men) into four distinct categories: normal geometry (NG), concentric remodeling (CR), concentric hypertrophy (CH), and eccentric hypertrophy (EH). Purpose To assess and describe the LV-GLS values (SD) in male and female patients with CKD across different remodeling patterns and compare them to controls without comorbidities Methods A retrospective echocardiographic analysis was conducted on patients evaluated from 01/01/2008 to 12/31/2018. A total of 546 CKD patients and 1041 controls were identified and matched in a ≈2:1 ratio by age, gender, and cardiac geometry. ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer analysis compared GLS across groups, with data distributions visualized via box plots. P-values <0.05 were considered significant. Results The mean age of CKD patients and controls was 63.3 (SD 12.7) and 63.1 (SD 12.6) years, respectively. Overall, GLS values in CKD patients were comparable to controls, with significant differences in select subgroups. In females with eccentric hypertrophy, GLS was lower in CKD stage V vs. controls (-16.2 ± 2.5 vs. -20.7 ± 2.3, p < 0.05), CKD stage III (-16.2 ± 2.5 vs. -19.5 ± 2.4, p < 0.05), and CKD stage IV (-16.2 ± 2.5 vs. -20.2 ± 2.4, p < 0.05) (Table 1). Across CKD stages, GLS trended toward the lower limit of normality, particularly in advanced CKD. In males with normal geometry, GLS values for controls and CKD stages I, II, III, IV and V were -20.3 ± 1.9, -19.1 ± 2.3, -19.4 ± 2.7, -19.5 ± 2.8, -19.8 ± 3.6, and -17.7 ± 2.7 (Figure 1a). In females, corresponding values were -21.0 ± 2.2, -19.9 ± 2.7, -20.2 ± 2.0, -20.8 ± 2.5, -20.2 ± 3.4, and -18.8 ± 3.4, respectively (Figure 1b). Conclusion GLS values in CKD patients were largely comparable to controls for both genders. However, those with CKD V exhibited GLS values near the lower limit of normality, particularly in eccentric hypertrophy. These findings suggest that in this group of patients there is subclinical myocardial dysfunction, warranting further investigation. The values reported may serve as reference points for GLS assessment in CKD patients.