Back to Authors

Gersin, Keith S.

Mayo Clinic

Cleveland Clinic

Citations 1

A Multicenter Double-blind Randomized Sham-controlled Trial Assessing the EndoBarrier Duodenal-jejunal Bypass Liner for the Treatment of Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Concomitant Obesity
Thompson, Christopher C. , Jirapinyo, Pichamol , Brethauer, Stacy A., Shaheen, Nicholas J. , Sullivan, Shelby , Wilson, Erik B., Schulman, Allison R. , Butsch, W. Scott , Gersin, Keith S., Apovian, Caroline M., Schauer, Philip, McCarty, Thomas R. , Koch, Timothy R. , Dayyeh, Barham K. Abu

Annals of Surgery | November 7, 2025 | Volume: 284 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 34-42

10.1097/sla.0000000000006974 Get It

Objective: An endoscopically placed duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) may provide a safe adjunctive therapy for those with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity. Background: Although some endoscopic therapies have been shown to improve glycemic indices secondary to weight loss, small bowel interventions may have direct metabolic effects. A meta-analysis of observational studies demonstrated reduction in HbA1c by 1.3% at 1 year after DJBL in patients with T2DM and obesity. Methods: This was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial comparing DJBL to sham procedure with medical management and lifestyle modification. Primary endpoints included mean difference in changes in HbA1c at 12 months between arms, and device-related serious adverse events (SAEs). Secondary endpoints included percent total weight loss (%TWL) and subjects achieving HbA1c≤7% and TWL≥5% at 12 months. Results: Three hundred twenty subjects were randomized to DJBL (n=212) and sham (n=108). Baseline HbA1c and BMI were 8.79±0.92% and 38.45±5.75 kg/m 2 . On modified intent-to-treat analysis, change in HbA1c at 12 months was −1.10±1.45% and −0.28±1.54% for DJBL and sham groups, respectively ( P =0.0004). Rate of device-related SAEs was 9.4% including intolerance (3.7%), hemorrhage (2.8%), and hepatic abscess (2.3% stopping study early). At 12 months, DJBL group experienced greater weight loss compared with sham (7.7±9.6% TWL and 2.1±5.4% TWL, respectively; P <0.0001), with significantly more patients achieving HbA1c ≤ 7% (28.3% vs. 9.4%; P <0.0003) and TWL ≥ 5% (60.4% vs. 21.3%; P <0.0001). Conclusions: DJBL met primary glycemic control efficacy and primary safety endpoints, while providing clinically significant weight loss, and comorbidity improvement.