Banala, Keerthana Reddy

Background: Adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) face ongoing physical, emotional, and psychosocial challenges that impact long-term outcomes. Research is limited on how their health topic interests vary by levels of empowerment. The 15-item Gothenburg Empowerment Scale (GES) assesses CHD patient empowerment across five domains. Objective: Examine the association between patient empowerment levels and patient-prioritized health education topics among adults with CHD. Methods: This cross-sectional study included adults (≥18) with self-reported CHD enrolled in the Empower My Congenital Heart digital study. Participants completed the GES survey and responded to open-ended questions regarding information of interest to them in managing their healthcare. GES scores were divided into tertiles, and responses were grouped into patient-prioritized topics. Descriptive analysis examined associations between empowerment levels and topic preferences. Results: Of 292 eligible patients, mean age was 45.6 ± 14.7 years, 91.4% were Caucasian, and 66.4% were female. The median (25th, 75th) GES score was 62 (57, 68). The most frequently observed patient prioritized topic was CHD health knowledge (73%), followed by interest in building CHD community (52.7%), lifestyle management (23.6%), health care navigation (7.2%), research and representation (5.1%). Participants in the lower and middle GES tertiles more frequently expressed interest in foundational sub-topics such as understanding CHD and surgical history, finding ACHD specialists, exercise and nutrition. In contrast, participants in the highest GES tertile prioritized sub-topics related to aging with CHD, managing menopause, CHD research and legislative activities. Peer support was a common topic across all groups (Figure 1). Patient quotes were stratified by tertile and patient prioritized health topics and subtopics as summarized in table 1. Conclusion: Adults with CHD prioritized varied health education topics depending on their baseline empowerment levels. Those with lower GES scores prioritized foundational information and guidance, while those with higher scores prioritized community-oriented and research-related topics. These findings could help tailor CHD patient-centered education strategies based on individual empowerment profiles.

Background: It is currently unknown whether patient engagement in adult congenital heart disease (CHD) care is influenced by social determinants of health (SDOH) such as race/ethnicity, education, and income. Adapting from the chronic care model, patient engagement, defined as the knowledge, skills, ability, and willingness to manage one’s health, can minimize lapses in care and improve CHD care outcomes. Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzes data from patients aged 18 and older with a self-reported diagnosis of CHD enrolled in a digital health research study called Empower My Congenital Heart. Patient engagement was measured using the Gothenburg Empowerment Scale (GES). We compared mean GES scores across demographic categories (race/ethnicity, education, and income), using independent samples t-tests or one-way ANOVA as appropriate. Additionally, we conducted a multivariate linear regression analysis to evaluate the impact of race/ethnicity, education, and income on GES scores, adjusting for age, gender, marital status, parental status, and employment status. Results: Of 323 adult CHD patients, the mean age was 45.6 ±15 years, 32.5% were males, 89.9% were non-Hispanic White, 29.7% had less than a Bachelor's degree, and 43.5% had less than $100,000 annual household income. The mean GES score was 61.8 ± 8, with significantly higher scores observed for non-Hispanic White identifying individuals (p=0.006) and those with a Bachelor's or higher level of education (p=0.005), while no difference across income levels (p = 0.394) (Figure 1). Linear regression analysis demonstrated that race and ethnicity remained significantly associated with GES scores (Table 1). Conclusions: Race/ethnicity and education level (in the bivariate analysis only), but not income, are the SDOH variables significantly associated with how empowered a CHD patient is in managing their health care. Future interventions that target enhancing patient engagement and self-management skills should take into consideration the influence of these demographic and social factors.