Spahn, Martin

140 Background: High-risk prostate cancer (HRPC) is a challenging disease and the role of surgery is often considered in the context of a multimodal approach but patients with positive section margins (R1) disease have not always the same cancer-specific survival (CSS). The current study aims to analyze current postoperative pathological features in order to predict CSS of HRPC patients with R1, but with negative lymph nodes (pN0), treated with surgery. Methods: From a multi-institutional retrospective cohort of 5,876 HRPC patients treated by radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection, 1541 patients with pN0 and R1 were selected. Following surgery, adjuvant EBRT and/or ADT were delivered according to institutional protocols. Patients were subdivided into four groups according to pT stage (pT≥3 and pT<3) and p-Gleason score (pGS≥8 and pGS<8). Kaplan-Meier plots with log-rank tests and a Cox proportional hazards model were applied to study CSS. All significance levels were set at 0.05. MedCalc was used for all statistical analyses. Results: Median age at surgery was 66 years (42-89). Of all patients, 399 (25.9%) had GS≥8 and 999 (64.8%) had pT≥3 at definitive histopathology. Patients were classified as COMBO groups: C1 (423; 27.4%; GS<8,pT<3), C2 (674; 43.7%; GS<8, pT≥3), C3 (83; 5.4%; GS≥8, pT<3), C4 (362; 23.5%; GS≥8, pT≥3). Adjuvant EBRT and ADT, respectively, were delivered in C1 3%/5%, C2 15%/21%, C3 21%/20%, C4 28%/40%. Kaplan-Meier plots demonstrated statistically different 10-yr CSS between groups: C1 97%, C2 93.8%, C3 85.1% and C4 77.3% (p<0.0001). COMBO groups were also compared using a Cox model and results are shown in the Table. Conclusions: COMBO groups demonstrated to be able to subdivide margin-positive, pN0 HRPC into 4 demarcated groups with significantly different CSS. This subdivision could be considered an easy-to-use tool which can help for counseling patients for adjuvant treatment strategies. [Table: see text]

114 Background: High-risk prostate cancer (HRPC) is a challenging disease and the role of surgery is often considered in the context of a multimodal approach. The indication for adjuvant therapy after surgery for HRPC patients who have specimen-confined disease (R0, pN0, <pT3b) is still difficult. The current study aims to analyze postoperative pathological features which help to predict CSS in specimen-confined HRPC and thus may aid in the decision to administer adjuvant EBRT or ADT. Methods: From a multi-institutional retrospective cohort of 5876 HRPC patients treated by radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection, 1391 patients with specimen-confined disease were selected. Following surgery, adjuvant EBRT and/or ADT were delivered according to institutional protocols. Patients were subdivided into four groups according to pT stage (pT≥3 and pT<3) and final Gleason score (GS≥8 and GS<8). Kaplan-Meier plots with log-rank tests and a Cox proportional hazards model were applied to study CSS. All significance levels were set at 0.05. MedCalc was used for all statistical analyses. Results: Median age was 65 years (43-84). Of all patients, 346 (24.9%) had GS≥8 and 794 (57.1%) had pT≥3 at definitive histopathology. Patients were classified into COMBO groups: C1 (478; 34.4%; GS<8,pT<3), C2 (567; 40.8%; GS<8, pT≥3), C3 (119; 8.6%; GS≥8, pT<3), C4 (227; 16.3%; GS≥8, pT≥3). Adjuvant EBRT and ADT, respectively, were delivered in C1 2%/2%, C2 15%/22%, C3 3%/10%, C4 18%/25%. Kaplan Meier plots demonstrated statistically different 10-yr CSS between groups: C1 97.4%, C2 95.2%, C3 89.9% and C4 84.4% (p<0.0001). COMBO groups were also compared using a Cox model and results are shown in the Table. Conclusions: COMBO groups demonstrated to be able to subdivide specimen-confined HRPC into 4 demarcated groups with significantly different CSS. This subdivision could be considered an easy-to-use tool which can help for counseling patients for adjuvant treatment strategies. [Table: see text]

84 Background: In elderly patients, Charlson score among other features, might allow clinicians to limit the use of aggressive adjuvant treatment strategies or even primary surgical treatment to those who might not achieve benefit during their lifetime. Methods: Retrospective analysis, 7,650 case multicenter high-risk prostate cancer (Pca) radical prostatectomy database selecting >= 70 years old cases. We predicted death from all causes (DAC) and cancer related death (CRD) including all clinical and pathological data. Multivariable analysis were performed to identify independent predictors of DAC and CRD with binary logistic regression, using STATA® software, version 13.1. Results: 2,106 patients from 14 high-volume centers were included. Mean age was 72.8 years (SD 2.46). 206 (9.78%) patients were classified as ASA 3-4 and 497 (23.6%) as CS >=1. Mean PSA was 21.7 ng/ml (SD 50.5). At final histopathology, 800 (38%) had pT3b-T4 disease, GS was 8-10 in 589 (28%), LNI was found in 518 (24.6%) and 822 (39%) PSM. Adjuvant RT, ADT and RT+ADT were administered in 359 (17%), 391 (18.6%) and 437 (20.7%), respectively. Mean follow up was 5.18 years (DS 4.47). BCR occur in 649 (30.8%) and CF in 150 (7.1%) of which distant in 59 (2.8%). Total deaths accounted 341 (16.2%) and CRD for 100 (4.7%) cases. Conclusions: Multicenter data confirms that elderly patients survival harboring high risk prostate cancer will benefit from radical treatment if they are Charlson score 1 or less. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Objectives To identify which patients with macroscopic bladder‐infiltrating T4 prostate cancer ( PC a) might have favourable outcomes when treated with radical cystectomy ( RC ). Materials and Methods We evaluated 62 patients with cT 4cN0–1 cM0 PC a treated with RC and pelvic lymph node dissection between 1972 and 2011. In addition to descriptive statistics, the Kaplan–Meier method and log‐rank tests were used to depict survival rates. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis tested the association between predictors and progression‐free, PC a‐specific and overall survival. Results Of the 62 patients, 19 (30.6%) did not have clinical progression during follow‐up, two (3.2%) had local recurrence, and 32 (51.6%) had haematogenous and nine (14.5%) combined pelvic and distant metastasis. Forty patients (64.5%) died, 34 (54.8%) from PC a and six (9.7%) from other causes. The median (range) survival time of the 19 patients who were metastasis‐free at last follow‐up was 86 (1–314) months, 8/19 patients had a follow‐up of >5 years, and five patients survived metastasis‐free for >15 years. Patients without seminal vesicle invasion ( SVI ) had the best outcomes, with an estimated 10‐year PC a‐specific survival of 75% compared with 24% for patients with SVI . Conclusion For cT 4 PC a RC can be an appropriate treatment for local control and part of a multimodality‐treatment approach. Although recurrences are probable, these do not necessarily translate into cancer‐specific death. Men without SVI had a 75% 10‐year PC a‐specific survival. Although outcomes for patients with SVI are not as favourable, there can be good local control; however, these patients are at higher risk of progression and may need more aggressive systemic treatment.

Introduction. To assess the role of adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in high-risk prostate cancer patients (PCa) after surgery.Materials and Methods.The analysis case matched 172 high-risk PCa patients with positive section margins or non-organ confined disease and negative lymph nodes to receive adjuvant ADT (group 1,n=86) or no adjuvant ADT (group 2,n=86).Results. Only 11.6% of the patients died, 2.3% PCa related. Estimated 5–10-year clinical progression-free survival was 96.9% (94.3%) for group 1 and 73.7% (67.0%) for group 2, respectively. Subgroup analysis identified men with T2/T3a tumors at low-risk and T3b margins positive disease at higher risk for progression.Conclusion. Patients with T2/T3a tumors are at low-risk for metastatic disease and cancer-related death and do not need adjuvant ADT. We identified men with T3b margin positive disease at highest risk for clinical progression. These patients benefit from immediate adjuvant ADT.