Khalid, Mian

Bridging locoregional therapy (LRT) is widely used in liver transplant (LT) candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to minimize waitlist dropout and evaluate tumor biology. While transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has historically been the predominant approach, the role of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is expanding. Comparative effectiveness data for these 2 modalities as bridging strategies remain limited. This study assessed the trends, factors influencing therapy selection, and outcomes of transarterial bridging LRT. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult LT candidates with HCC listed in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) between 2016 and 2024 who received TACE or TARE as their sole bridging LRT. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was applied to balance baseline covariates. Multivariable Fine–Gray competing risk regression and stratified Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models were used to assess waitlist dropout, complete pathological necrosis (CPN), recurrence, and overall survival. Among 8367 patients, 5472 (65%) received TACE, and 2895 (35%) received TARE. TARE use increased significantly from 22.5% to 51.7% over the study period. TARE was more likely to be used among patients with MASLD, older age, and high tumor burden, and less likely in those with lower socioeconomic status. TARE recipients had a significantly lower risk of waitlist dropout (sHR 0.83, p <0.001) and a higher likelihood of achieving CPN (aOR 2.24, p <0.001). The overall survival did not differ significantly between groups (aHR 0.94, p =0.19). The use of TARE as bridging therapy in HCC LT candidates has surged and is influenced by socioeconomic factors, comorbidities, and tumor burden. TARE effectiveness has been demonstrated by its advantages in waitlist retention and tumor necrosis. Further studies are warranted to evaluate its impact on post-LT recurrence and to validate the cost-effectiveness among transarterial therapies.