Lewis, Natasha

Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with CBFB::MYH11 fusion and myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and tyrosine kinase gene fusions (MLN-TK) are genetically defined and typically mutually exclusive entities. Case Presentation: We report a unique case of de novo AML harboring two clonal, transcriptionally active class-defining fusions: CBFB::MYH11 and GOLGA4::PDGFRB. A 61-year-old woman presented with leukocytosis with neutrophilia, eosinophilia, and monocytosis; circulating blasts; and a markedly hypercellular marrow. Cytogenetic analysis revealed inv(16)(p13.1q22) and t(3;5)(p21;q32) in all 20 metaphases, and RNA sequencing confirmed expression of both CBFB::MYH11 and GOLGA4::PDGFRB fusions. In addition, an oncogenic WT1 frameshift variant was identified. Hematopathologic findings were largely consistent with AML with CBFB::MYH11 fusion but exhibited features reminiscent of PDGFRB-rearranged MLN-TK. The patient achieved complete remission following the standard 7 + 3 induction chemotherapy regimen for AML with gemtuzumab ozogamicin. Conclusions: This case illustrates the diagnostic challenges posed by concomitant class-defining alterations in hematologic neoplasms and underscores the importance of integrated genomic assessment.

Evaluation of T-cell receptor (TCR) β-chain constant region 1 (TRBC1) expression is an alternative T-cell clonality assessment method. However, evaluation of TRBC1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) for distinguishing mycosis fungoides (MF)/Sezary syndrome (SS) from reactive inflammatory infiltrates in skin is incomplete. We evaluated the utility of a novel dual TRBC1-CD3 IHC stain in skin biopsies with MF/SS (n=40), reactive (n=24), or atypical T-cell infiltrates indeterminant for MF/SS (n=9). Twenty of 24 reactive cases showed clear polytypic TRBC1 expression (median percent TRBC1 positivity among CD3-positive T cells [%TRBC1+] 50% in dermis, 42.5% in epidermis among all cases), while 34/40 MF/SS were clearly monotypic (%TRBC1+ either ≤20% or ≥85%) (sensitivity 85.0%, specificity 91.7%, positive predictive value 94.4%, negative predictive value 78.6%). Discordance between TRBC1 expression and diagnosis was associated with few neoplastic/monotypic T cells and/or lack of physical separation between neoplastic and non-neoplastic populations. Among patch/plaque MF/SS, TRBC1 showed similar diagnostic sensitivity (80.0% vs. 86.7%) and high categorical correlation (monotypic vs. not monotypic, 80%) with TCR gene rearrangement results. TRBC1 interpretation was reproducible, with ≥2/3 and 3/3 pathologists rendering identical interpretations in 100% and 86% of cases, respectively, after independent review and 100% agreement following collective review. Digital image analysis confirmed visual %TRBC1+ accuracy ( r =0.9749, P <0.0001). On the basis of these results, we propose %TRBC1+ cutoffs of <25% or >75% for establishing T-cell monotypia in skin. Considering such thresholds, TRBC1-CD3 evaluation facilitated diagnostic refinement in 7/9 (78%) atypical cases. Overall, TRBC1-CD3 IHC clearly and rapidly aids diagnosis of cutaneous T-cell proliferations.