Nelson, Garth D.

Abstract Background Follicular lymphoma (FL) is an indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) with heterogeneous outcomes and remains largely incurable. Immunochemotherapy (IC) continues to be the standard therapy backbone in the frontline and relapsed settings, though novel agents are increasingly used and investigated. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory molecule with known single-agent activity in relapsed lymphoma. It is also active in the frontline setting and has been reported to be effective and tolerated in upfront combination regimens in FL (Fowler et al, Lancet Oncol. 2014, 15(12):1311-8). Here we report our experience with frontline use of R2CHOP (lenalidomide in combination with R-CHOP) in patients with FL. Methods A phase 1/2 study of R2CHOP was conducted in NHL patients with primarily diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). While the phase 2 study was focused on DLBCL patients, treatment-naive patients with stage II-IV, histologically-confirmed FL (grades 1, 2, and 3a) meeting criteria for therapy were eligible for the phase 1 part of the study. Additionally, FL patients were identified in the phase 2 portion of the study after central pathology review. These patients were allowed to complete therapy and were followed accordingly. Treatment consisted of 6 cycles of R2CHOP with lenalidomide given on days 1-10 and R-CHOP given in 21-day cycles. All patients received pegfilgrastim and aspirin (if not on anticoagulation) along with other supportive measures per provider discretion. Primary objectives were safety assessment and efficacy. Results Ten patients with FL (3 had grade 1, 3 had grade 2, and 4 had grade 3a) were enrolled in the R2CHOP phase 1/2 study at Mayo Clinic. One patient was in the phase 1 arm at dose level 2 (lenalidomide 20 mg/d) and 9 patients were in the phase 2 arm (lenalidomide 25 mg/d). The mean age was 60.8 years (range: 41-82). Eight out of ten patients were male; 5/10 had ECOG performance status of 0; 5/10 had an IPI score of intermediate or higher. All patients completed 6 cycles of planned treatment. One patient required lenalidomide dose adjustment due to toxicity. There were no lenalidomide dose interruptions. The overall response rate (ORR) was 100% and the complete response (CR) rate defined by PET imaging was 90%. Eight out of ten remain progression-free and 9/10 are alive at a median follow-up of 4.6 years (range: 2.1-5.3). Estimated progression-free survival (PFS) at 5 years was 79% (95% CI: 56-100%). The main toxicity was reversible myelosuppression with 80% treatment-related hematologic grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) (leukopenia 80%, neutropenia 80%, thrombocytopenia 40%, anemia 20%, transaminitis 20%). Rate of nonhematologic grade 3 or higher AEs was 20% (fatigue 10%, pneumonia 10%). Conclusions Frontline therapy with R2CHOP in patients with untreated FL appears to be effective and associated with acceptable toxicity. The observed PET-based CR rate and PFS were promising in this cohort. Whether R2CHOP is superior to lenalidomide/rituximab alone or standard bendamustine/rituximab will require randomized studies. Figure Estimated PFS in FL patients treated with upfront R2CHOP. Figure. Estimated PFS in FL patients treated with upfront R2CHOP. Disclosures Reeder: Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding. Foran:novartis: Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; pfizer: Honoraria; karyopharm: Honoraria; medscape: Honoraria; boehringer ingelheim: Research Funding; agios: Research Funding; Cellerant: Research Funding. Nowakowski:Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 689 Background: Lenalidomide was demonstrated to have significant single agent activity in relapsed aggressive B cell lymphoma (J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:4952–7, Ann Oncol. 2011;22:1622–7). In a phase I study, we previously demonstrated that Lenalidomide 25 mg day 1–10 of the cycle can be combined with RCHOP21 and this combination does not result in dose delays or increased toxicity (Leukemia 2011;12:1877–81). We now present phase 2 results of R2CHOP in treatment of patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma. Methods: Eligible patients were adults with newly diagnosed CD20 positive diffuse large B cell (DLBCL) or grade 3 follicular lymphoma (FL). The response was evaluated using PET/CT by standard criteria (J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:579–586). The progression free survival (PFS) was defined as time from diagnosis to disease progression or death. Results: 51 patients - 6 enrolled at the MTD in phase 1 portion of the study and 45 in phase 2 portion were included in the analysis. The median age was 65 years (range, 19–87). 35% of patients were 70 and older. 63% (32/51) were males. 47 patients (92%) had DLBCL and 4 (8%) patients had FL grade 3. The international prognostic index (IPI) was low, low-intermediate, high-intermediate and high in 8 (15%), 18 (35%), 18 (35%) and 7 (14%) patients respectively. 31 patients (60%) had stage 4 disease. Hematological toxicities were: grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia (20% and 20% of patients respectively); grade 3 and 4 neutropenia (18% and 71% of patients respectively). Overall 27% of patients experienced a grade 3 or higher non-hematological toxicity at least possibly related to treatment. The most frequent were febrile neutropenia (10%), nausea (4%), urinary tract infection (4%), vascular access complication (4%), and dehydration (4%). 1 patient (2%) developed thrombosis. There was one death (2%) secondary to bowel perforation/sepsis. For 47 patients evaluable for response, the overall response (ORR) and complete response (CR) rates were 98% and 83% respectively. The PFS was 73% at 12 months (Figure). Since the enrolled patients represented a relatively high-risk group (49% intermediate high or high IPI, significant proportion of elderly male patients), the PFS in R2CHOP was compared to PFS in a contemporary cohort of 87 consecutive patients with DLBCL participating in Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Database and treated with standard RCHOP alone. The PFS was 62% at 12 months in this cohort and was inferior to R2CHOP (Figure). Conclusion: Lenalidomide combined with standard R-CHOP21 chemotherapy (R2CHOP) demonstrates predictable safety profile. The ORR and CR rates and PFS are encouraging in elderly high IPI patients, and compared favorably to the R-CHOP treated historical cohort with similar clinical characteristics. A randomized trial will be needed to confirm the benefits of this novel combination. Disclosures: Off Label Use: lenalidomide in treatment of NHL. Reeder:Celgene: Research Funding. Ansell:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy.

Purpose The US National Cancer Institute (NCI) Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) was developed to enable patient reporting of symptomatic adverse events in oncology clinical research. This study was designed to assess the feasibility and resource requirements associated with implementing PRO-CTCAE in a multicenter trial. Methods Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer enrolled in the National Cancer Institute–sponsored North Central Cancer Treatment Group (Alliance) Preoperative Radiation or Selective Preoperative Radiation and Evaluation before Chemotherapy and Total Mesorectal Excision trial were asked to self-report 30 PRO-CTCAE items weekly from home during preoperative therapy, and every 6 months after surgery, via either the Web or an automated telephone system. If participants did not self-report within 3 days, a central coordinator called them to complete the items. Compliance was defined as the proportion of participants who completed PRO-CTCAE assessments at expected time points. Results The prespecified PRO-CTCAE analysis was conducted after the 500th patient completed the 6-month follow-up (median age, 56 years; 33% female; 12% nonwhite; 43% high school education or less; 5% Spanish speaking), across 165 sites. PRO-CTCAE was reported by participants at 4,491 of 4,882 expected preoperative time points (92.0% compliance), of which 3,771 (77.2%) were self-reported by participants and 720 (14.7%) were collected via central coordinator backup. Compliance at 6-month post-treatment follow-up was 333 of 468 (71.2%), with 122 (26.1%) via backup. Site research associates spent a median of 15 minutes on PRO-CTCAE work for each patient visit. Work by a central coordinator required a 50% time commitment. Conclusion Home-based reporting of PRO-CTCAE in a multicenter trial is feasible, with high patient compliance and low site administrative requirements. PRO-CTCAE data capture is improved through centralized backup calls.

446 Background: MutKRAS and mutBRAF are important predictive and prognostic markers, respectively, in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, little is known about why some tumors harbor these mutations. N0147 is a phase III adjuvant trial for stage III CRC patients (N=3397) in which patients completed questionnaires and tumor variables and KRAS/BRAF mutation status was assessed. Methods: 2,323/3,397 patients who were enrolled prior to a 2008 amendment requiring KRAS testing completed a Patient Questionnaire. Primary tumors were assessed for mutKRAS and mutBRAF using standard methods; MMR status was determined using IHC. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of mutation status. Results: 60% and 86% of mutKRAS and mutBRAF tumors were right-sided, respectively. MutKRAS was less likely if there was a family history of CRC and in ever-smokers, and was nearly mutually exclusive with mutBRAF. MutBRAF was associated with deficient MMR (dMMR), high grade histology, and 4+ positive lymph nodes at surgery. MutBRAF was more likely in patients age > 70, retired persons, ever-smokers, but was less likely in non-whites and men. Conclusions: Smoking, family history of CRC, and dMMR status are associated with lower frequency of mutKRAS , but higher mutBRAF. Both mutations tend to be right sided, and mutBRAF is more common in the elderly, females, and non-Hispanic whites. [Table: see text]

Alcohol consumption is associated with a modest increased risk of colon cancer, but its relationship with colon cancer survival has not been elucidated. Using data from a phase III randomized adjuvant trial, we assessed the association of alcohol consumption with colon cancer outcomes. Patients completed a risk factor questionnaire before randomization to FOLFOX or FOLFOX + cetuximab (N = 1984). Information was collected on lifestyle factors, including smoking, physical activity and consumption of different types of alcohol. Cox models assessed the association between alcohol consumption and outcomes of disease‐free survival (DFS), time‐to‐recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS), adjusting for age, sex, study arm, body mass, smoking, physical activity and performance status. No statistically significant difference in outcomes between ever and never drinkers were noted [hazard ratio (HR)DFS = 0.86, HRTTR = 0.87, HROS = 0.86, p‐values = 0.11–0.17]. However, when considering alcohol type, ever consumers of red wine (n = 628) had significantly better outcomes than never consumers (HRDFS = 0.80, HRTTR = 0.81, HROS = 0.78, p‐values = 0.01–0.02). Favorable outcomes were confirmed in patients who consumed 1‐30 glasses/month of red wine (n = 601, HR = 0.80–0.83, p‐values = 0.03–0.049); there was a suggestion of more favorable outcomes in patients who consumed >30 glasses/month of red wine (n = 27, HR = 0.33–0.38, p‐values = 0.05–0.06). Beer and liquor consumption were not associated with outcomes. Although alcohol consumption was not associated with colon cancer outcomes overall, mild to moderate red wine consumption was suggestively associated with longer OS, DFS and TTR in stage III colon cancer patients.

Abstract Purpose: To determine the frequency and prognostic association of molecular markers by anatomic tumor site in patients with stage III colon carcinomas. Experimental Design: In a randomized trial of adjuvant FOLFOX ± cetuximab, BRAFV600E and KRAS (exon 2) mutations and DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins were analyzed in tumors (N = 3,018) in relationship to tumor location, including subsite. Cox models were used to assess clinical outcome, including overall survival (OS). Results: KRAS codon 12 mutations were most frequent at the splenic flexure and cecum; codon 13 mutations were evenly distributed. BRAF mutation frequency sharply increased from transverse colon to cecum in parallel with deficient (d) MMR. Nonmutated BRAF and KRAS tumors progressively decreased from sigmoid to transverse (all P < 0.0001). Significantly, poorer OS was found for mutant KRAS in distal [HR, 1.98; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.49–2.63; P < 0.0001] versus proximal (1.25; 95% CI, 0.97–1.60; P = 0.079) cancers. BRAF status and outcome were not significantly associated with tumor site. Proximal versus distal dMMR tumors had significantly better outcome. An interaction test was significant for tumor site by KRAS (Padjusted = 0.043) and MMR (Padjusted = 0.010) for OS. Significant prognostic differences for biomarkers by tumor site were maintained in the FOLFOX arm. Tumor site was independently prognostic with a stepwise improvement from cecum to sigmoid (OS: Padjusted = 0.001). Conclusions: Mutation in BRAF or KRAS codon 12 was enriched in proximal cancers whereas nonmutated BRAF/KRAS was increased in distal tumors. Significant differences in outcome for KRAS mutations and dMMR were found by tumor site, indicating that their interpretation should occur in the context of tumor location. Clin Cancer Res; 21(23); 5294–304. ©2015 AACR.

Abstract Introduction: Peripheral blood leukocyte (PBL) telomere length is associated with colon cancer (CC) risk, but the relationship of PBL telomere length to survival in CC patients receiving chemotherapy is unknown. Methods: We measured relative telomere length (RTL) by qPCR of PBL DNA from 2,748 cases (53% male, 85% white, median age 58 yrs) in the North American Phase III Intergroup Trial N0147 that compared disease-free survival (DFS) among completely resected Stage III CC treated with mFOLFOX6 +/- cetuximab. Tumor markers were assessed, and 12% were BRAF mutant; 35% Kras mutant, and 12% deficient mismatch repair (dMMR). Linear and non-linear prognostic associations of PBL RTL to the primary endpoint of DFS were assessed by Cox models. Optimal categories of RTL were developed using cumulative martingale residual plots, designated from shortest to longest RTL (Table 1). Results: Never smokers had longer PBL RTL (p = 0.0006) than past or current smokers. Those with diabetes mellitus (DM) had longer PBL RTL than those without DM (p = 0.0165). PBL RTL was not associated with any tumor markers (MMR status; p = 0.7174; BRAF mutant vs wild-type (wt); p =0.4039; Kras mutant vs wt; p= 0.1149). PBL RTL was significantly associated with DFS in a non-linear form (p = 0.0389). Cases in the longer RTL category had more favorable DFS than those with shorter or longest RTL, (Table), which remained after adjusting for age, sex , T/N stage, grade, tumor markers, and treatment (p = 0.0230). We observed no significant interaction (p = 0.1490) between RTL categories and treatment. Conclusion: We observed a non-linear association between RTL and DFS in stage III CC, suggesting that an optimal range telomere length can influence tumor behavior in CC patients. Future studies of telomere maintenance mechanisms may help to explain the association of RTL with improved DFS. RTL is associated with smoking and DM in CC cases but further studies are needed to determine if either tobacco use or DM affect survival from CC by modulating PBL telomere length. Citation Format: Nivedita Basu, Ruth A. Johnson, Qian Shi, Garth D. Nelson, Julie M. Cunningham, Richard M. Goldberg, Frank A. Sinicrope, Daniel J. Sargent, Steven R. Alberts, Gloria M. Petersen, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Halcyon G. Skinner, Kristin Litzelman, Songwon Seo, Russell J. Vanderboom, Ronald E. Gangnon, Corinne D. Engelman, David N. Rider, Lisa A. Boardman. Telomeres and survival in stage III colon cancers: Findings from NCCTG N0147 (Alliance) study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 5102. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-5102