Mohan, A.

Resistant hypertension (RH) is a high-risk phenotype characterized by blood pressure readings ≥130/80 mmHg despite maximally tolerated therapy with three antihypertensive agents, including a diuretic, or controlled blood pressure requiring four or more medications. The diagnosis of RH requires a structured evaluation that confirms accurate blood pressure measurement, excludes pseudoresistance—particularly nonadherence and white coat hypertension—and identifies secondary causes such as obstructive sleep apnea, primary aldosteronism, renovascular disease, pheochromocytoma, and Cushing syndrome. RH arises from overlapping mechanisms, including activation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS), sympathetic overactivity, arterial stiffness, volume expansion, and immune-mediated pathways. Management begins with lifestyle modification and optimized triple therapy, followed by mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists as the preferred fourth-line treatment. Emerging pharmacological options, such as sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, endothelin receptor antagonists, aldosterone synthase inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor and neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), offer additional therapeutic potential; meanwhile, device-based interventions, including renal denervation and baroreflex activation therapy, have shown sustained blood pressure reductions in selected patients. Future directions highlight precision medicine, digital health technologies, and artificial intelligence as methods to improve diagnosis, guide individualized therapy, and enhance long-term blood pressure control.

Immunotherapy has transformed oncology, yet kidney complications increasingly affect outcomes. This review summarizes nephrotoxicity from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies, and bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs). ICIs remain most used, with acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) as the hallmark lesion, while glomerular diseases and electrolyte abnormalities are less common. CAR-T therapy, though highly effective in hematologic cancers, carries risks of cytokine release syndrome, tumor lysis syndrome, and acute kidney injury (AKI). BiTEs, particularly teclistamab, show higher AKI rates than CAR-T, though mechanisms remain unclear. Early recognition, tailored management, and multidisciplinary collaboration are essential to ensure safe therapy and preserve kidney function.

Background: Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGF-I) are frequently used for cancer treatment. VEGF-I can cause proteinuria and acute kidney injury (AKI) with thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) as a commonly described pathology, but other glomerular pathologies are not well characterized. We aim to describe the clinical characteristics and glomerular lesions associated with VEFG-I in a single center cohort. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients treated with VEGF-I and underwent kidney biopsies from 2010 to 2022 at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Biopsy findings were reviewed by our pathologists. Data on patients’ characteristics, clinical course, and outcomes were abstracted. Descriptive statistics were used to report relevant patient characteristics and findings. Results: From 2010 to 2022, 19 kidney biopsies were performed for kidney dysfunction in patients on VEGF-I. Eleven had complete data, with a median age of 62 years (interquartile range 58–66 years); renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was the most common cancer (4 of 11 patients). TMA was noted in 8 of the 11 biopsies, with proteinuria as the most frequent indication for biopsy in these cases. Three patients had findings other than TMA. One developed anti-phospholipase A2 receptor negative membranous nephropathy; VEGF-I and pembrolizumab were discontinued, and prednisone improved proteinuria. Another patient had known cryoglobulinemia with nephrotic range proteinuria which was exacerbated by VEGF-I peaking at 11 g/day. Despite stopping VEGF-I and treating with prednisone and rituximab, kidney dysfunction progressed to end stage kidney disease (ESKD). A third patient had IgA nephropathy with concurrent diabetic changes, but proteinuria progressed even after stopping VEGF-I. Conclusion: In this case-series of patients treated with VEGF-I undergoing kidney biopsy, we describe the pathological characteristics, clinical course, and outcomes of patients with pathologies other than TMA. Our study adds information to the sparse literature on patients with renal dysfunction after receiving VEGF-I.