Wooldridge, Abigail R.

A positive margin following tumor resection (i.e., surgical removal of a cancerous tumor) indicates that cancer may remain in the body and can require a re-operation. This study is part of a larger project designing a technology to support the intraoperative evaluation of margins. This study explores the goals, decisions, information needs, and system requirements of a surgeon performing breast cancer surgery. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 11 breast surgeons to understand how they currently perform resections and then performed a qualitative thematic analysis. We identified three main goals and 13 subgoals. The three main goals are: treating cancer, meeting patient needs, and meeting institutional needs. Surgeons made multiple decisions to accomplish each sub goal and required multiple information elements to make these decisions. Our results will inform the design of the new technology and a sociotechnical systems-based analysis to ensure the technology fits in surgeon workflow.

Human factors/ergonomics (HF/E) is increasingly recognized as critical to improve patient safety, quality of care and health care professional wellbeing; in particular, much HF/E work has focused on surgery and surgical teams. However, conducting research and practicing in health care broadly, and the operating room (OR) specifically, requires specialized knowledge, skills and experience. HF/E professionals trained in other application areas may face challenges in transitioning due to the specialized knowledge required, regulatory considerations, and complex sociotechnical systems in the OR. This panel is designed for HF/E students, practitioners and researchers who are interested in expanding their work to the OR, procedural suites or modeling these for usability studies. The panel will provide attendees with insights from established HF/E researchers and professionals who study the OR as well as a newcomer to the domain, offering perspectives on career transition challenges, opportunities, and strategies for success.

Achieving negative surgical margins is critical for patient outcomes in breast-conserving surgery (BCS), however positive margins require reoperation in 20% to 40% of cases currently. This study explores design criteria and current barriers and facilitators to margin definition and assessment as part of designing an intraoperative tool for margin assessment during BCS. We conducted observations of nine surgeries by four surgeons at a quaternary medical center. We analyzed the data using the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model to identify barriers and facilitators to margin assessment. We identified 38 barriers and 62 facilitators, which we inductively categorized into dimensions. The dimensions included teamwork, information display design, intraoperative tool use, and tissue characteristics. Teamwork was the most frequently observed dimension, followed by information display design and intraoperative tool use. This study provides insights to support the design of workflow-adaptive solutions and improve margin accuracy and surgical performance in breast oncology procedures.

Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is a standard treatment for breast cancer, but achieving clear negative margins to avoid re-excision remains a challenge. Current intraoperative margin assessment techniques, such as frozen section analysis and imprint cytology, are limited by resource demands and workflow integration challenges. This study explores the physical design considerations for a handheld intraoperative imaging probe to assess tumor cavity margins during BCS. Data were collected through 9 surgical observations, 11 semi-structured interviews with breast surgeons, and interdisciplinary team meetings. Inductive thematic analysis identified key design priorities, including ergonomic handling, flexible probe tips, consistent tissue contact, and compatibility with both direct and tunneled access. Surgeons emphasized the need for quick scanning times and binary margin outputs, with interest in supplementary real-time imaging. These findings offer foundational insights for the iterative development of a clinically viable margin assessment tool aimed at reducing re-excisions and improving surgical outcomes in breast cancer care.