Chan, Carlos

Background: Splanchnic venous thrombosis (SVT) is a potentially severe and frequently underdiagnosed complication following splenectomy in patients with hematologic diseases. Despite its clinical importance, no standardized, evidence-based guidelines currently exist to inform perioperative prevention, diagnosis, or treatment in this population. Materials and Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines to estimate the incidence and risk factors for SVT after splenectomy in patients with hematologic diseases. Twenty-eight observational studies comprising 5025 patients were included. Risk factor data were analyzed using random-effects models. In parallel, an international Delphi consensus process was performed involving 35 experts (hematologists and surgeons) from 14 countries. Experts were assigned to five domain-specific groups and developed clinical statements on prophylaxis, diagnosis, and management of SVT. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement, and recommendations were graded using the GRADE framework. Results: The pooled incidence of SVT after splenectomy was 11.4%, with higher rates in studies using routine imaging (20.7%) and those conducted at single centers (15.1%). Splenic size and weight were significant risk factors, while age, BMI, and platelet count were not. Disease-specific risk was highest in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms, lymphoma, and thalassemia. The Delphi process generated 25 consensus statements, 14 of which were classified as strong recommendations. Key guidance included perioperative vaccination, individualized thromboprophylaxis with BMI-adjusted low molecular weight heparin, selective Doppler-based screening in high-risk patients, and stepwise anticoagulation regimens based on thrombus burden and clinical evolution. Conclusion: This study presents the first international consensus-based guidelines for managing SVT after splenectomy in patients with hematologic disease. Developed through systematic evidence synthesis and expert consensus, these recommendations provide a practical framework rather than definitive standards of care and support individualized prevention, detection, and treatment strategies in this high-risk population.

Background Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is the only curative treatment for pancreatic cancer. Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has enhanced survival, especially for downstaging advanced tumors, while also introducing complexities and new complications. Despite surgical advances, some PD attempts remain unsuccessful. The management of these cases is not well defined. This study analyzes outcomes of repeat PD performed by two high-volume surgeons following previously unsuccessful attempts. Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients with pancreatic neoplasm undergoing successful pancreaticoduodenectomy (2013-2024) at two high-volume centers under two experienced surgeons. Only cases with prior aborted PD attempts for non-metastatic disease were included. Data from institutional records provided outcomes on failure reasons, procedure timing, surgical details, and 90-day complications. Results Of the 858 PD cases, 18 patients (2.1%; 12 males, 6 females; median age 69 years) had prior unsuccessful PD attempts at other institutions. Initial tumors were borderline resectable (33.3%), resectable (22.2%), or locally advanced (22.2%). Main causes for initial failure were vascular involvement (41.2%) and tumor infiltration (17.6%). Median time between attempts was 246 days, with 77.8% receiving chemotherapy before the second attempt. The second procedure achieved R0 resection in 94.4% of cases. Major 90-day complications occurred in 23.5% of patients, with no perioperative mortality. Disease recurrence occurred in 38.9% within the first year. Conclusion Repeat PD after an aborted attempt is feasible in select patients at specialized centers. However, complication and recurrence rates emphasize the need for careful patient selection. Further research is needed to optimize management strategies.