Back to Authors

Gantchev, Jennifer

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5236-0671

Mayo Clinic

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Citations 1

Preclinical Modeling of Navtemadlin Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy in IDH–Wild-type Glioblastoma
Vaubel, Rachael A. , Oh, Ju-Hee, Mladek, Ann C. , Pasa, Tugce I. , Gantchev, Jennifer , Waller, Katie L. , Baquer, Gerard , Stopka, Sylwia A. , Regan, Michael S. , Hossain, Md Amin , Decker, Paul A. , Kosel, Matthew , Sarkaria, Paige P., Hu, Zeng , Ott, Lauren L. , Carlson, Brett L. , Zhang, Wenqiu , Lee, Eudocia Q. , Eckel‐Passow, Jeanette E. , Elmquist, William F. , Zhang, Wenjuan , Oh, Ju-Hee , Mladek, Ann C , Pasa, Tugce I , Gantchev, Jennifer K , Waller, Katie L , Baquer, Gerard , Stopka, Sylwia A , Regan, Michael S , Hossain, Md Amin , Decker, Paul A. , Kosel, Matthew , Gupta, Shiv K , Jain, Sonia , Sarkaria, Paige P , Hu, Zeng , Ott, Lauren L , Carlson, Brett L , Bakken, Katrina K , Talele, Surabhi , Zhang, Wenqiu , Ligon, Keith L , Lee, Eudocia Q , Eckel-Passow, Jeanette E , Burgenske, Danielle M , Agar, Nathalie Y R , Elmquist, William F , Sarkaria, Jann N , Vaubel, Rachael A , Zhang, Wenjuan , Gupta, Shiv K. , Jain, Sonia , Bakken, Katrina K. , Talele, Surabhi , Burgenske, Danielle M. , Agar, Nathalie Y.R. , Sarkaria, Jann N.

Clinical Cancer Research | July 1, 2025 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 17 | Pages: 3771-3786

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-0244 Get It

Abstract Purpose: Navtemadlin is a potent small-molecule inhibitor of MDM2, which has completed a phase 0 window-of-opportunity study in glioblastoma (GBM). To optimally interpret the clinical data, a detailed analysis of navtemadlin pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and efficacy was performed in GBM patient-derived xenografts (PDX). Experimental Design: Response to navtemadlin was characterized in vitro and in vivo in GBM PDXs with and without MDM2 amplification. Efficacy in vivo was integrated with measured plasma and intra-tumoral drug levels to develop a translational PK/efficacy model comparing exposure effective in PDX to exposure achieved in phase 0 patient samples. Results: In vitro, navtemadlin showed robust on-target activity in TP53–wild-type GBM. In vivo efficacy strongly correlated with MDM2 amplification status. In subcutaneous PDXs, navtemadlin significantly extended survival when dosed at 25 mg/kg in an MDM2-amplified PDX compared with 100 mg/kg in a non-amplified PDX. Central nervous system distribution was limited by blood–brain barrier efflux (Kp_brain = 0.009). In an MDM2-amplified orthotopic PDX model, navtemadlin was ineffective at 100 mg/kg; when established in mice with deficient blood–brain barrier efflux (Rag−/−Abcb1a−/−Abcg2−/−), 25 mg/kg doubled survival. A tumor PK/efficacy model was built to define target exposure for efficacy in GBM, using the effective 25 mg/kg dose. Modeled exposures exceeded this threshold in three (of 16) tumor samples from phase 0 study patients at the 240 mg dose level. Conclusions: Navtemadlin efficacy was highly dependent on adequate brain penetration. Our translational PK/efficacy model suggests that the minimum effective tumor exposures were achieved only in a minority of patients with GBM.