Im, Yeon Hee

Objectives: Novel biomechanics of the exhalation delivery system can deliver fluticasone (EDS-FLU; XHANCE) to sinonasal areas above the inferior turbinate, especially sinus drainage pathways not reached by standard nasal sprays. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of EDS-FLU in treating chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Methods: Studies were retrieved from PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to April 2024. We analyzed 5 studies that compared EDS-FLU with a control group (exhalation delivery system with placebo) on various outcomes, including the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), nasal symptom scores (congestion, facial pain, olfactory dysfunction, and rhinorrhea), nasal polyp scores, surgical indication rate, and the incidence of adverse effects. Results: Five studies with 2129 patients were included. EDS-FLU significantly improved SNOT-22 score (−20.9657 [−23.5639; −18.3674]) and the polyp score (−1.5099 [−1.7810; −1.2388]) after 6 months. The incidence of epistaxis was significantly higher in the treatment group compared to the control group (OR = 5.7954 [2.1004; 15.9909]). Effects of EDS-FLU on polyp score (−0.6497 [−0.8186; −0.4807]), responder rate (OR = 2.1755 [1.2784; 3.7020]), complete responder rate (OR = 2.0423 [1.0109; 4.1262]), surgical indication rate (OR = 0.7313 [0.5459; 0.9797]), and SNOT-22 score (−6.1513 [−11.3054; −0.9972]) were significantly higher in the treatment group than in the control group. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that EDS-FLU (372 µg twice daily) produced statistically significant improvements compared to EDS-placebo in multiple subjective and objective outcomes, although some adverse effects, such as epistaxis, may occur.

Abstract Objective Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is characterized by type I immunoglobulin E (IgE)‐mediated hypersensitivity reactions to fungal antigens. This systematic review and meta‐analysis assessed the efficacy of biologics in the management of refractory AFRS. Data Sources PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane. Review Methods Changes in Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT)‐22 scores, endoscopic findings, serum eosinophil count, and total IgE levels were assessed in patients with refractory AFRS after receiving biologic therapy. Subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate the individual efficacy of each biologic agent, including dupilumab, mepolizumab, and omalizumab. Results A total of 60 patients from 6 studies were analyzed. Biologics showed a significant improvement in SNOT‐22 scores (standard mean difference 1.1607 [95% CI 0.5549; 1.7664]), endoscopic scores (2.1953 [1.4181; 2.9725]), serum eosinophil count (1.1649 [0.7735; 1.5563]), and total IgE level (1.0700 [0.4052; 1.7348]). Dupilumab, mepolizumab, and omalizumab all enhanced SNOT‐22 and endoscopic scores. Additionally, dupilumab significantly reduced total IgE levels (1.2981 [0.4063; 2.1900]), whereas both dupilumab (0.9274 [0.1592; 1.6957]) and mepolizumab (1.2324 [0.9215; 1.5433]) significantly lowered the serum eosinophil counts. Conclusion The agents significantly improved nasal symptoms, laboratory findings, and endoscopic scores. These findings support the potential role of biologics as a therapeutic option for patients with AFRS who are unresponsive to conventional treatments.