Shah, Narayan R.

PURPOSE: To determine the toxicity and response rate in children treated with dexamethasone, etoposide, cisplatin, high-dose cytarabine, and l-asparaginase (DECAL) for recurrent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin’s disease (HD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-seven children with recurrent NHL (n = 68) or HD (n = 29) were enrolled. Treatment consisted of two cycles of DECAL, then bone marrow transplantation or up to four cycles of ifosfamide, mesna, and etoposide alternating with DECAL maintenance therapy. RESULTS: After two cycles of DECAL induction therapy, complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) was reported in 19 (65.5%; 10 CRs and nine PRs) of 29 patients with HD and 29 (41.6%; 23 CRs and six PRs) of 68 patients with NHL. When only 24 patients with HD and 58 patients with NHL who were assessable for response were considered, the response rates were 79.2% (19 of 24 patients) and 50.0% (29 of 58 patients), respectively. Five-year event-free survival was 26% ± 9% and 23% ± 5% in patients with HD and NHL, respectively. Five-year survival was 31% ± 14% and 30% ± 6%, respectively. Although median time to treatment failure was significantly longer in patients with HD (EFS, P = .002; survival, P = .011), this difference did not translate into a higher long-term survival. Grade 3 or 4 toxic effects were observed during induction in 70 (72%) of 97 patients and during maintenance in 45 (70%) of 64 courses of DECAL therapy. Pancytopenia and systemic infections in particular were frequently observed. Other toxic effects were uncommon. Although not a formal part of the therapy or the study design, 42 patients who responded to therapy who underwent bone marrow transplant did not show any benefit from this approach. CONCLUSION: DECAL is an effective and tolerable salvage regimen for treating patients with recurrent NHL and HD.

Purpose: To investigate the effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on hematopoietic toxicities, supportive care requirements, time to complete intensive therapy, and event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in children with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (HR-ALL). Patients and Methods: A total of 287 children with HR-ALL were randomly assigned to intensive chemotherapy regimens (New York I [NY I] or NY II) as part of the Children’s Cancer Group (CCG)-1901 protocol. The induction phases consisted of five drugs (vincristine, prednisone, l-asparaginase, daunorubicin, and cyclophosphamide). Initial consolidation comprised six-agent chemotherapy combined with 18 Gy of total-brain irradiation. Patients were randomly assigned to receive G-CSF (5 μg/kg/day) during either induction or initial consolidation. A crossover study analysis was done on the 259 patients who completed both phases of therapy. Results: The mean time to neutrophil recovery (≥ 0.5 × 109/L) was reduced with G-CSF (16.7 v 19.1 days, P = .0003); however, patients who received G-CSF did not have significantly reduced episodes of febrile neutropenia (149 v 164, P = .41), positive blood cultures (57 v 61, P = .66), or serious infections (75 v 79, P = .62). Hospitalization (14.0 v 13.9 days, P = .87) and induction therapy completion times (NY I, 30.3 v 31.3 days, P = .11; NY II, 33.4 v 32.3 days, P = .40) were not significantly altered. There were no differences in 6-year EFS (P = .24) or OS (P = .54) between patients receiving or not receiving G-CSF on CCG-1901, NY I and NY II. Conclusion: Children with high-risk ALL do not appear to benefit from prophylactic G-CSF.