Williams, David O.

Background —The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) included 4039 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease; 1829 consented to randomization, and 2010 did not but were followed up in a registry. Thus, we can evaluate the outcome of physician-guided versus random assignment of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Methods and Results —We compared the baseline features and outcomes for PTCA and CABG in the overall registry and its predesignated subgroups. We assessed the impact of treatment by choice versus random assignment by comparing the results in the registry with those of the randomized trial. Statistical adjustments for differences in baseline characteristics were made. Within the registry, nearly twice as many patients were selected for PTCA (1189) as CABG (625); mortality at 7 years was similar for PTCA (13.9%) and CABG (14.2%) ( P =0.66) before and after adjustment for baseline differences between patients selected for PTCA versus CABG (adjusted RR, 1.02; P =0.86). In contrast to the randomized trial, the 7-year mortality rate of treated diabetics in the registry was equally high (26%) with PTCA or CABG. Seven-year mortality was higher for patients undergoing PTCA in the randomized trial than in the registry (19.1% versus 13.9%, P <0.01) but not for those undergoing CABG (15.6% versus 14.2%, P =0.57). The adjusted relative mortality risk for PTCA in the randomized versus registry population was 1.17 ( P =0.16). Conclusions —BARI physicians were able to select PTCA rather than CABG for 65% of registry patients who underwent revascularization without compromising long-term survival either in the overall population or in treated diabetics.

Background Cardiac mortality and myocardial infarction (MI) rates are used to evaluate the efficacy of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). We compared 5-year cardiac mortality and MI rates in 1829 patients with multivessel disease randomized to CABG or PTCA. Methods and Results The 5-year cardiac mortality rate was 8.0% in patients assigned to PTCA compared with 4.9% in those assigned to CABG (relative risk [RR] of 1.55 with a 95% confidence interval [CI] of 1.07 to 2.23; P =.022). In a subgroup of 1476 nondiabetic patients, there were no significant differences between treatment groups in cardiac mortality either overall (4.6% versus 4.2%; RR=1.04, 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.66; P =.908) or in subgroups based on symptoms, left ventricular function, number of diseased vessels, or stenotic proximal left anterior descending artery. The two treatment groups had similar event rates for the combined end point of cardiac death or MI. The RR for cardiac mortality in 264 patients who sustained an MI compared with those who did not was 5.9 ( P <.001). MIs were more common after CABG during index hospitalization ( P =.004), but in the PTCA group, they were more common after discharge ( P <.001). Conclusions The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) trial indicates 5-year cardiac mortality in patients with multivessel disease was significantly greater after initial treatment with PTCA than with CABG. The difference was manifest in diabetic patients on drug therapy. There were no significant differences overall for the composite end point of cardiac mortality or MI between treatment groups or for cardiac mortality in nondiabetic patients regardless of symptoms, left ventricular function, number of diseased vessels, or stenotic proximal left anterior descending artery.

Background The NHLBI Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) Registry followed 1345 consecutive patients with first PTCA between 1977 and 1981 (registry 1) and 2136 consecutive patients with PTCA between 1985 and 1986 (registry 2). Changes in patient selection and in immediate and 1-year outcome are presented. This report extends to 5 years the comparison of the effects of early and more recent management with PTCA. Methods and Results Sixteen participating centers entered consecutive patients who had angioplasty for the first time between 1977 and 1981 and between 1985 and 1986. Patients with recent myocardial infarction (MI) were excluded. Vessel disease was defined according to the Coronary Artery Surgery Study. Successful dilatation required ≥20% reduction in luminal narrowing and <50% lumen diameter stenosis after intervention. Routine annual follow-up was conducted by telephone interview. The product-limit method was used to estimate freedom from untoward events, Cox regression analysis to model relative risk and adjusted relative risk of events between the two registries, and logistic regression when the exact time of outcome (such as recurrence of symptoms) was not known. Long-term event rates were computed by vessel disease for all patients and for the cohort of patients with initially successful PTCA. After adjustment for extent of disease, diabetes, prior bypass surgery (CABG), hypertension, age, and sex, the 5-year risk of death was similar in the two registry cohorts. However, rates of MI, CABG, and a combined outcome measure of death, MI, and/or CABG were significantly lower in the registry 2 cohort both for all patients and for patients who were initially treated successfully. Use of repeated PTCA was higher, and freedom from symptoms without adverse events was significantly better in the latter cohort. Conclusions Compared with registry 1, the management of the registry 2 cohort resulted in lower 5-year morbid event rates and reduced CABG operations. Mortality rates remained similar. When symptomatic status was considered in combination with events, a significantly better outcome was seen overall and in the initially successful cohort. In registry 2, repeated PTCA was used with much greater frequency early after the initial procedure.

BACKGROUND Coronary revascularization with bypass has been shown to improve survival in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. In these patients, use of nonsurgical revascularization with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is increasing, although their long-term outcome has not been well delineated. The purpose of this investigation was to characterize the outcome of angioplasty in patients with decreased left ventricular function and contrast it with the results in patients with normal left ventricular function. METHODS AND RESULTS In the 1985-1986 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's PTCA Registry, of 1,802 patients undergoing PTCA, 244 patients (13.5%) had an ejection fraction of < or = 45% (mean, 39.6 +/- 6.8%). These patients had a higher incidence of prior infarction, a longer and worse history of manifestations of coronary disease, and more extensive coronary artery disease than patients with well-preserved function; 88% and 91%, respectively, had successful dilation of at least one lesion (nonsignificant difference). However, patients with decreased left ventricular function had a decreased frequency of successful dilation of all lesions in which PTCA was attempted (76% versus 84%, p < 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in in-hospital complications--death occurred in 0.8% and 0.7%, nonfatal myocardial infarction occurred in 4.9% and 4.5%, and emergency surgical revascularization was performed in 4.5% and 3.2%, respectively. Patients were followed for a mean of 4.1 years; during this time, patients with decreased left ventricular function had significantly worse survival and combined event-free survival. Despite this, at 4 years, 87% of the patients with a mean ejection fraction of 39.6% remained alive, and 77% were alive and had not experienced infarction or required bypass. CONCLUSIONS PTCA is effective in selected patients with depressed left ventricular function. Initial outcome and risk-benefit ratio are excellent. Successful dilation of at least one vessel was achieved in 88% of patients with depressed left ventricular function and in 91% of patients with more normal left ventricular function. The former group, however, had a decreased incidence of successful dilation in all lesions in which dilation was attempted (76% versus 84%, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in in-hospital complications between the two groups. During follow-up, patients with decreased left ventricular function had worse event-free survival, although 77% were alive without infarction or bypass grafting at 4 years.

September 2007 marked the 30-year anniversary of the first human percutaneous coronary intervention, an index event that changed the course of modern-day cardiovascular care. Before that first procedure, adult invasive cardiology focused on diagnostic angiography as well as hemodynamic assessment of structural heart disease. Since that initial procedure, percutaneous coronary intervention has become the most frequently performed coronary revascularization procedure worldwide. Several factors have been responsible for this dramatic paradigm shift, the most prominent being identification of opportunities for technical improvement and the application of innovation and investigation in concert with colleagues, professional societies, and industry. These approaches will continue to be of paramount importance as new technologies are brought to bear on an increasingly broader group of patients with cardiovascular disease.

Background— Validation of in-hospital mortality models after percutaneous coronary interventions using multicenter data remains limited. Methods and Results— This study evaluated whether multivariable mortality models developed during the pre-stent era by New York State, American College of Cardiology (ACC)–National Cardiovascular Data Registry, Northern New England Cooperative Group, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, and the University of Michigan are relevant in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the 1997 to 1999 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry. Of 4448 Dynamic Registry patients, 73% received ≥1 stent and 28% received a IIB/IIIA receptor inhibitor. In-hospital mortality occurred in 64 patients (1.4%). The New York state model predicted mortality in 69 patients (1.5%; 95% confidence bounds [CI], 0.89% to 1.70%); Northern New England predicted mortality in 60 patients (1.3%; 95% CI, 1.0% to 1.7%); and Cleveland Clinic predicted mortality in 76 patients (1.7%; 95% CI, 1.3% to 2.1%). Among high-risk subgroups, with these 3 models, observed and predicted in-hospital mortality rates in general were not different. The other 2 models yielded different results. The University of Michigan predicted fewer deaths (n=47; 1.1%; 95% CI, 0.7% to 1.3%), and the ACC Registry model predicted 603 deaths (13.5%; 95% CI, 12.6% to 14.4%). Using the ACC Registry model, predicted mortality was higher than observed in each subgroup. Conclusions— Application of 5 mortality risk models developed from different data sets to patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the Dynamic Registry predicted, in 3 models, mortality rates that were not significantly different than those observed. In both high and low risk subgroups, the University of Michigan slightly underpredicted mortality, and the ACC Registry predicted significantly higher mortality than that observed.