Back to Authors

Rodda, Joanne

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2837-9265

Mayo Clinic

Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust

Citations 2

Global multi‐specialty clinician perspectives on the implementation of Alzheimer's disease blood biomarkers
Rodda, Joanne , Borelli, Wyllians Vendramini, Chabrashvili, Tinatin, Budelier, Melissa M. , Duran‐Aniotz, Claudia, Anderson, Leyla, Pereira, Ana Carolina, Castilhos, Raphael Machado, Kuchenbecker, Lindsey A. , Borelli, Wyllians Vendramini , DeMarco, Mari L. , Cawston, Erin E. , Chabrashvili, Tinatin, Duran‐Aniotz, Claudia , Udeh‐Momoh, Chinedu , Mielke, Michelle M. , Algeciras‐Schimnich, Alicia , Keshavan, Ashvini , Castilhos, Raphael Machado

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 25, 2025 | Volume: 21 | Issue: S2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz70856_100267 Get It

Abstract Background Clinicians’ views on clinical readiness of Alzheimer's disease (AD) blood biomarkers (BBM) are not well understood. Method The Alzheimer's Association International Society to Advance Alzheimer's Research and Treatment Biofluid‐Based Biomarkers Professional Interest Area conducted a survey to elicit clinician opinions on AD BBM implementation, including contexts of use, assay selection, reporting and result interpretation. Result Clinician respondents ( n = 212) practiced in Europe (56%), North America (24%), Caribbean and Central or South America (11%) and other continents (9%). Most respondents were medical doctors (80%) practicing in secondary or tertiary care (88%) (Table 1). For 56% of respondents, CSF AD biomarkers or amyloid PET were accessible, but 48% agreed and 52% disagreed with implementation of AD BBM in any clinical context (Table 2). Respondents emphasized the need for data from diverse populations and educational resources to support test interpretation. Conclusion Surveyed clinicians generally agreed with published appropriate use recommendations but were divided on AD BBM readiness for clinical use.
Global multi‐specialty clinician perspectives on the implementation of Alzheimer's disease blood biomarkers
Rodda, Joanne , Kuchenbecker, Lindsey A. , Chabrashvili, Tinatin, Budelier, Melissa M. , Duran‐Aniotz, Claudia , Udeh‐Momoh, Chinedu , Akman‐Anderson, Leyla, Pereira, Ana C. , Keshavan, Ashvini , Keshavan, Ashvini , Borelli, Wyllians Vendramini , DeMarco, Mari L. , Castilhos, Raphael Machado , Cawston, Erin E. , Mielke, Michelle M. , Algeciras‐Schimnich, Alicia

Alzheimer's & Dementia | May 22, 2025 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 5 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.70201 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION Clinicians’ views on the clinical readiness of Alzheimer's disease (AD) blood biomarkers (BBMs) are not well understood. METHODS The Alzheimer's Association International Society to Advance Alzheimer's Research and Treatment Biofluid‐Based Biomarkers Professional Interest Area conducted a survey to elicit clinician opinions on AD BBM implementation, including contexts of use, assay selection, reporting, and result interpretation. RESULTS Clinician respondents ( n = 212) practiced in Europe (56%), North America (24%), the Caribbean and Central/South America (11%), and other continents (9%). Most respondents were medical doctors (80%) practicing in secondary or tertiary care (88%). For 56%, cerebrospinal fluid AD biomarkers or amyloid positron emission tomography were accessible, but 48% agreed and 52% disagreed with the implementation of AD BBMs in any clinical context. Respondents emphasized the need for data from diverse populations and educational resources to support test interpretation. DISCUSSION Surveyed clinicians generally agreed with published appropriate use recommendations but were divided on AD BBM readiness for clinical use. Highlights A survey of clinicians was conducted regarding clinical readiness of Alzheimer's disease (AD) blood biomarkers (BBMs). Views were split on AD BBM clinical readiness: 48% agreed, 52% disagreed. Most responders supported AD BBM use for treatment decisions. Most responders opposed AD BBM testing in asymptomatic individuals. Test performance data and educational materials to aid interpretation were of high importance.