Back to Authors

Thomas, M.

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic in Florida

Citations 1

Outcomes With ABO Identical Versus ABO Compatible Blood Groups in Patients Undergoing Lung Transplantation
Balasubramanian, P., Bongu, R., Francisco, Angel de, Baz, Maher A. , Narula, Tathagat , Haney, John C. , Makey, Ian A. , Thomas, M., Alomari, M., Francisco, A., Shah, Sadia , Bag, Remzi

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine | May 11, 2025 | Volume: 211 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: A1112-A1112

10.1164/ajrccm.2025.211.abstracts.a1112 Get It

Abstract Introduction: The data on outcomes comparing lung transplantation with ABO-identical versus ABO-compatible blood group is limited. Composite Allocation Score(CAS) was introduced on March 9th, 2023, and has considered additional points for the difficult-to-match blood group. We aimed to study the trend and outcomes of patients who underwent lung transplants with ABO identical versus compatible blood groups. Methods: We queried the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) database of those who underwent lung transplantation between 10/1/1987 to 3/31/2024 and compared the outcomes between those who had ABO-identical vs ABO-compatible blood groups. Combined organ transplants and recipients age <18 were excluded. Results: A total of 50,406 patients were included in our study, out of which 4,111 (8.15%) were ABO-compatible and 47,347 (91.85%) were ABO-identical. Among the recipient demographics, the ABO-compatible group compared to the ABO-identical group showed a lesser lung allocation score (40 ± 16 vs 42 ± 16), but higher A-blood group (59% vs 38%), obstructive lung disease (38% vs 33%), CAS (49 ± 13 vs 47 ± 10), mechanical ventilator support pre-transplant (6.2% vs 5.2%), need for ex-vivo lung perfusion (9.6% vs 5.8%) and listing for single lung transplant (39% vs 34%), all p<0.05. The donors for the ABO-compatible group had a closer distance to the transplant center (205 ± 285 vs 226 ± 265 nautical miles), lesser white race (61% vs 64%), and gender mismatch (30% vs 32%) but higher male gender (64% vs 61%), O-blood group (81% vs 49%) and ethnicity mismatch (45% vs 41%), all p<0.05. The univariate analysis showed a higher 30-day (7.2% vs 5.8%), 1-year (22% vs 19%), and 5-year (54% vs 50%) mortality among patients with ABO-compatible compared to ABO-identical recipients, all p<0.001. However, the adjusted odds ratio of 30-day (0.76, 95% CI 0.36-1.47, p=0.4), 1-year (1.07, 95% CI 0.69-1.66, p=0.7) and 5-year (0.69, 95% CI 0.46-1.05, p=0.081) mortality were not statistically significant with ABO-identical when compared to ABO-compatible group on adjusting to the covariates in the multivariate analysis. The trend of ABO-compatible lung transplantation has been increasing with the introduction of CAS (figure 1). Conclusion: Patients who underwent lung transplantation with the ABO-compatible blood group donor organs had similar outcomes compared to the ABO-identical blood group. The findings of our study reinforce the importance of increasing the use of ABO-compatible organs to enhance the lung transplantation rate, aligning with the observed trend following the introduction of CAS.