Algeciras-Schimnich, Alicia

Abstract Background Alzheimer’s disease (AD) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, including the Aß42/40 and p-tau181/Aß42 ratios, are used in clinical practice to detect the presence of amyloid pathology for the diagnosis of AD. However, in some instances, discrepancies between Aß42/40 and p-tau181/Aß42 are observed. Such discrepancies may introduce uncertainties in the clinical management of patients presenting with cognitive decline. Identifying the underlying causes of these discrepancies and determining which biomarker abnormalities better predict disease progression is crucial to enhancing confidence in the use of these CSF biomarkers for the diagnosis of AD. This study aims to investigate the discordance between the Aß42/40 and p-tau181/Aß42 ratios, evaluate the frequency of these discrepancies, and identify potential causes. Methods Data from 958 individuals who had both CSF Aß42/40 and p-tau181/Aß42 tested at Mayo Clinic Laboratories between 2022 and 2024 and where the tests were ordered in CSF collected during the same lumbar puncture procedure were included. Cases with an inadequate sample collection, which could cause a false decrease in Aß42 concentrations, were excluded from the analysis. Aß42/40 was measured using the Fujirebio LUMIPULSE assays and reported as negative, likely positive, or positive. For this analysis, likely positive and positive results were combined and considered as positive (<0.072). P-tau181/Aß42 was measured using the Roche Elecsys assays and above 0.028 was considered positive. Statistical analyses were conducted using R Studio. Results Aß42/40 was positive in 69.1% of cases (n=661), while p-tau181/Aß42 was positive in 62.1% (n=594). There were 8.0% discordant cases (n=77). Most frequently, the discordant cases had an abnormal Aß42/40 with a normal p-tau181/Aß42 (Aß42/40+/p-tau181/Aß42-; n=72, 94%). Compared to the concordant Aß42/40+/p-tau181/Aß42+ group, the discordant Aß42/40+/p-tau181/Aß42- group showed significantly higher Aß42 concentrations (p <0.001, median [pg/mL]: 878.5 vs 587.0, respectively); whereas p-tau181 concentrations were significantly lower (p <0.001, median [pg/mL]: 19.3 vs 32.1, respectively). Among the Aß42/40+/p-tau181/Aß42- group, 30 cases exhibited abnormally low Aß42 and normal p-tau181, possibly reflecting early-stage AD. There were 41 cases with a normal Aß42 concentration despite an abnormal Aß42/40, possibly reflecting an overall higher production of Aß peptides resulting in an increased Aß40 peptide (median [pg/mL]: 12627 compared to 9487 in the low Aß42 and normal p-tau181 cases (n=30); p <0.001). Of these 41, 19 showed normal Aß42 but elevated p-tau181 concentrations where the use of Aß42/40 compensated for the overall higher production of Aß peptides, resulting in an abnormal ratio. In contrast, the p-tau181/Aß42 ratio was not able to normalize for these differences, leading to a normal ratio. Conclusion While overall concordance was 92.0%, our findings suggest that discrepancies between CSF Aß42/40 and p-Tau181/Aß42 are more often due to the presence of an abnormal Aß42/40 and a normal p-Tau181/Aß42. Two potential explanations for these discrepancies are early-stage AD or higher production of Aß peptides in some individuals. In the latter, differences in amyloid production would be normalized by ratios of the same biomarker (i.e. Aß42/40) but not by ratios of different biomarkers (i.e. p-Tau181/Aß42).

Abstract Aims Blood biomarkers (BBMs) are promising minimally invasive tools for the evaluation of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, recent studies have demonstrated that comorbidities, such as severe chronic kidney disease (CKD), may elevate circulating concentrations of various BBMs including amyloid-ß (Aß) and phosphorylated tau proteins (p-tau). Previous work has found that the effects of CKD on BBM plasma concentrations could be partially mitigated through use of biomarker ratios (e.g., the proportion of p-tau217 to non-phosphorylated tau217 (np-tau217)). In this work, we quantitatively evaluate how different combinations of BBM ratios and single biomarkers are affected in the context of decreased kidney function. Methods Participants (n=83, >57 years of age) with CKD stages 1-2 (eGFR 60-98, n = 50), and stages 3-4 (eGFR 25-59, n = 33) and without amyloid pathology (A-) were included. eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) was calculated using the 2021 CKD-EPI equation based on serum-paired creatinine measurements. Plasma p-tau217, np-tau217, p-tau181, np-tau181, Aß42, and Aß40 were measured by mass spectrometry (MS) (C2N Diagnostics). %p-tau217 [(p-tau217/np-tau217) x 100], %p-tau181 [(p-tau181/np-tau181) x 100], Aß42/Aß40 ratio, and p-tau217/Aß42 ratio were calculated. Log-Log (power function) best-fit regression analysis was used to quantitatively predict the relationship of BBM changes as a function of eGFR. Results Median concentrations of p-tau217, np-tau217, p-tau181, np-tau181, Aß42, and Aß40 were all significantly elevated in individuals with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 compared to those with eGFR > or =60 (all p < 0.05). There were no differences in the %p-tau217 and Aß42/Aß40 median values between these two groups (eGFR <60 versus > or =60) (p > 0.05); whereas the proportions %p-tau181 and p-tau217/Aß42 median values were higher in the eGFR > or =60 group versus the <60 subset. Observed best-fit analyte regression equations of eGFR versus BBM concentrations predict that an eGFR decrease from 60 to 45 results in p-tau217 and p-tau181 increases of 52% (95% confidence interval (CI): 30–78%) and 40% (95% CI: 29–53%), respectively. A 16% (95% CI: 12–21%), and a 19% (95% CI: 16–23%) increase was predicted in response to the same eGFR decline for Aß42 and Aß40. Furthermore, increases of 19% (95% CI: 2–38%) for %p-tau217, 6% (95% CI: -0.02–13%) for %p-tau181 and 31% (95% CI: 12–53%) for p-tau217/Aß42 were predicted as eGFR declined from 60 to 45, while a minor decrease of 2.3% (95% CI: -5.2–0.6%) was predicted for Aß42/Aß40. Conclusions: Reduction in eGFR is associated with significant elevations in plasma concentrations of p-tau217, p-tau181, Aß42, and Aß40, which may affect the interpretations of these biomarkers. However, the use of %p-tau217, %p-tau181, or p-tau217/Aß42 could partially attenuate this effect. Although the Aß42/Aß40 ratio is not considered an effective diagnostic BBM for AD, this ratio was relatively unaffected by CKD. For example, in comparison to p-tau217 alone, using %p-tau217 or p-tau217/Aß42, the relative increase in analyte values associated with decreased eGFR was reduced by 63% and 40%, respectively. These findings provide a better understanding of the effect of reduced eGFR on AD BBM interpretation in the presence of CKD.