Meves, Alexander

Abstract Keloid scar formation arises from a disorganized fibroproliferative collagen response that extends beyond the original wound margins because of excessive production of extracellular matrix (ECM). Despite treatment options for keloid scars including medical and surgical therapies, such as intralesional steroid injection and surgical excision, the recurrence rate remains high. Herein we consolidate recently published narrative reviews, systematic reviews, and meta‐analyses to provide an overview of updated treatment recommendations for keloidal scar formation. PubMed search engine was used to access the MEDLINE database to investigate updates regarding keloid incidence and treatment. More than 100 articles were reviewed. Keloid management remains a multimodal approach. There continues to be no gold standard of treatment that provides a consistently low recurrence rate; however, the increasing number of available treatments and synergistic combinations of these treatments (i.e., laser‐based devices in combination with intralesional steroids, or 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) in combination with steroid therapy) is showing favorable results. Future studies could target the efficacy of novel treatment modalities (i.e., autologous fat grafting or stem cell‐based therapies) for keloid management. This review article provides updated treatment guidelines for keloids and discusses insight into management to assist patient‐focused, evidence‐based clinical decision making.

ABSTRACT Integrin function depends on the continuous internalization of integrins and their subsequent endosomal recycling to the plasma membrane to drive adhesion dynamics, cell migration and invasion. Here we assign a pivotal role for Rabgap1 (GAPCenA) in the recycling of endocytosed active β1 integrins to the plasma membrane. The phosphotyrosine-binding (PTB) domain of Rabgap1 binds to the membrane-proximal NPxY motif in the cytoplasmic domain of β1 integrin subunits on endosomes. Silencing Rabgap1 in mouse fibroblasts leads to the intracellular accumulation of active β1 integrins, alters focal adhesion formation, and decreases cell migration and cancer cell invasion. Functionally, Rabgap1 facilitates active β1 integrin recycling to the plasma membrane through attenuation of Rab11 activity. Taken together, our results identify Rabgap1 as an important factor for conformation-specific integrin trafficking and define the role of Rabgap1 in β1-integrin-mediated cell migration in mouse fibroblasts and breast cancer cells.

AbstractBackgroundIntegrins are heterodimeric proteins composed of noncovalently linked ɑ and β subunits which are essential for a wide range of normal physiology and also play prominent roles in cancer. Here we tested whether integrin expression in diagnostic skin biopsies is associated with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis.MethodsWe utilized a cohort of 854 consecutive patients with primary cutaneous melanoma to quantify the expression of β integrin subunits by reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR (RT‐qPCR). In addition, we quantified the expression of β3 integrin by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in a subset of 271 patients by H score. Outcome of interest was SLN biopsy metastasis within 90 days of melanoma diagnosis. Logistic regression analyses were used to develop models for the likelihood of SLN metastasis from molecular, clinical, and histologic variables.Resultsβ3 integrin expression quantified by IHC or RT‐qPCR was associated with SLN metastasis. β1, β5, β6, and β8 integrin expression was not associated with SLN metastasis. The incremental gain in performance of a predictive model which included β3 integrin expression as quantified by IHC in combination with established clinicopathologic variables (Breslow depth and patient age) was limited.Conclusionsβ3 integrin is the principal integrin subunit associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNb) metastasis in primary cutaneous melanoma. However, β3 integrin H score does not significantly improve models for the likelihood of SLN metastasis over Breslow depth and patient age.

e22088 Background: In recent years, adjuvant therapy trials in stage III melanoma have been successful and trials have started with the inclusion of stage IIB/C patients. However, stage IIA melanoma patients are currently not eligible for adjuvant therapy, even though a large part of all melanoma related deaths occur in this patient group. Therefore, a strong clinical need has emerged for diagnostic tools that can identify high-risk patients who currently have no access to adjuvant therapy. Here, we sought to assess the ability of a recently introduced clinicopathologic gene expression model (CP-GEP) (Bellomo et al., JCO Precis Oncol. 2020: in press) to select stage IIA patients at high risk for disease relapse, upon design of a stage-specific operating point. Methods: We assessed the prognostic performance of the CP-GEP model in all 141 stage IIA patients from a Mayo Clinic cohort of 837 consecutive melanoma patients who had a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNb) performed within 90 days of their diagnosis. The CP-GEP model combines Breslow thickness and patient age, with the expression of 8 genes in the primary tumor. Moreover, it stratifies patients according to their risk of relapse: CP-GEP High Risk or CP-GEP Low Risk, based on an operating point that was specifically developed for stage IIA. This stage-specific operating point was selected to fulfill the following criteria: hazard ratio RFS > 2 with a p-value < 0.05, and risk groups of similar size. The main clinical endpoint was five-year relapse free survival (RFS). Results: The CP-GEP High Risk group corresponds to 45% (63/141) of all stage IIA patients and captures 62% (18/29) of the total relapses in this substage. Moreover, CP-GEP High Risk patients relapse more frequently than CP-GEP Low Risk patients (RFS of 56% versus 78%; HR, 2.23; P < 0.05). The prognosis for stage IIA CP-GEP High Risk patients in our cohort is worse than for stage IIC/IIIA patients with reported RFS ranging from 63% to 77%. Conclusions: The CP-GEP model can be optimized by designing a stage-specific operating point, to identify a subset of stage IIA patients with an increased risk for disease relapse, not very different from IIC/IIIA patients. Therefore, stage IIA CP-GEP High Risk patients may be considered for inclusion in adjuvant trials. Independent validation studies are ongoing for the newly developed operating point. [Table: see text]

e22024 Background: Disease surveillance in high risk melanoma patients using PET/CT is recommended every 6 months, an algorithm that is extremely expensive and often difficult to access. Biomarkers capable of detecting recurrence and low volume metastasis have application in tools to improve the cost effectiveness of surveillance. Towards this long term goal, our aim was to discover melanoma-specific methylated DNA markers (MDMs). Methods: Candidate MDMs were identified by reduced representation bisulfite sequencing of selected age- and sex-balanced snap frozen metastatic melanoma, benign control skin and white blood cells. Sequences were filtered for highest methylation difference, lowest control methylation background ( < 1%), and highest discrimination by variance inflated logistic regression. Using formalin-fixed tissues, the top 32 MDMs were further evaluated in metastatic melanoma from 35 patients, primary melanoma from 26 patients, and 73 control samples (47 benign precursor lesions or normal skin, and 26 healthy buffy coat samples to assess for background DNA in circulation). Candidate markers were blindly assayed by quantitative methylation specific PCR. After normalization by within sample ACTB level, random forest modeling with cross-validation identified marker combinations with greatest predictive accuracy. Results: On receiver operator characteristics analyses of individual marker candidates, areas under the curve (AUCs) ranged from 0.43 to 0.97. Median AUC was 0.835. At 100% specificity, a cross-validated panel of five MDMs (see Table), yielded a sensitivity of 33/35 cases (94.3%; 95% CI, 86.6-100%) for metastatic melanoma and 22/26 cases (84.6%; 95% CI, 70.7-98.5%) for primary melanoma. Furthermore, none of the 5 markers were detected in normal buffy coat samples. Conclusions: A panel of five novel MDMs assayed on tissue and undetectable in normal buffy coat achieves very high discrimination between melanoma and benign control tissues. This panel can be assessed in blood or other bodily fluids for application in melanoma surveillance. [Table: see text]

10068 Background: The identification of early stage melanoma patients at high risk for relapse is still difficult. Roughly 50% of melanoma deaths occur in patients who were initially diagnosed with nonmetastatic melanoma. Therefore, a strong clinical need has emerged for diagnostic tools that can identify melanoma patients at high risk for relapse. Here, we assessed the performance of a recently developed model (Bellomo et al., JCO Precis Oncol. 2020: in press), combining clinicopathologic and gene expression variables (CP-GEP), in identifying melanoma patients that have a high risk for disease relapse. Methods: We assessed the prognostic performance of the CP-GEP model in a cohort of 837 consecutive melanoma patients from Mayo Clinic who had a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNb) performed within 90 days of their diagnosis. The CP-GEP model combines Breslow thickness and patient age, with the expression of 8 genes in the primary tumor, to stratify patients according to their risk of relapse: CP-GEP High Risk or CP-GEP Low Risk. The main clinical endpoint of this study was five-year relapse free survival (RFS). Results: Patients were stratified based on SLNb status and CP-GEP classification. 76% of the patients were SLNb negative and had an RFS of 79% versus 52% for SLNb positive patients; HR, 3.21; P < 0.0001. 60% of the patients were identified as CP-GEP High Risk and had an RFS of 62% versus 87% for CP-GEP Low Risk patients; HR, 4.12; P < 0.0001. Within the SLNb negative group (637 patients of which 65% stage I), 51% of patients were classified as CP-GEP High Risk. Here, RFS was 70% for CP-GEP High Risk patients versus 89% for CP-GEP Low Risk patients; HR, 3.61; P < 0.0001. The prognosis of these CP-GEP High Risk patients is similar to stage IIC/IIIA patients with reported RFS ranging from 63% to 77%. This confirms the heterogeneity in prognosis among patients with stage I/II melanoma disease. Conclusions: The CP-GEP model can be successfully used to stratify patients based on their risk for relapse. In particular, it can be used to identify SLNb negative patients with a high risk for disease relapse who may benefit from therapeutic interventions. Independent validation studies are ongoing to validate the CP-GEP model in various patient populations. [Table: see text]

PURPOSEMore than 80% of patients who undergo sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy have no nodal metastasis. Here, we describe a model that combines clinicopathologic and molecular variables to identify patients with thin- and intermediate-thickness melanomas who may forgo the SLN biopsy procedure because of their low risk of nodal metastasis.PATIENTS AND METHODSGenes with functional roles in melanoma metastasis were discovered by analysis of next-generation sequencing data and case-control studies. We then used polymerase chain reaction to quantify gene expression in diagnostic biopsy tissue across a prospectively designed archival cohort of 754 consecutive thin- and intermediate-thickness primary cutaneous melanomas. Outcome of interest was SLN biopsy metastasis within 90 days of melanoma diagnosis. A penalized maximum likelihood estimation algorithm was used to train logistic regression models in a repeated cross-validation scheme to predict the presence of SLN metastasis from molecular, clinical, and histologic variables.RESULTSExpression of genes with roles in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (glia-derived nexin, growth differentiation factor 15, integrin-β3, interleukin 8, lysyl oxidase homolog 4, transforming growth factor-β receptor type 1, and tissue-type plasminogen activator) and melanosome function (melanoma antigen recognized by T cells 1) were associated with SLN metastasis. The predictive ability of a model that only considered clinicopathologic or gene expression variables was outperformed by a model that included molecular variables in combination with the clinicopathologic predictors Breslow thickness and patient age (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.86; SLN biopsy reduction rate, 42%; negative predictive value, 96%).CONCLUSIONA combined model that included clinicopathologic and gene expression variables improved the identification of patients with melanoma who may forgo the SLN biopsy procedure because of their low risk of nodal metastasis.

Abstract Integrins are the major family of cell adhesion receptors in humans and essential for a wide range of normal physiology, including formation and maintenance of tissue structure integrity, cell migration, proliferation, and differentiation. Integrins also play a prominent role in tumor growth and metastasis. Translational research has tried to define the contribution of integrins to the phenotypic aggressiveness of melanoma because such knowledge is clinically useful. For example, differential expression of integrins in primary cutaneous melanoma can be used to distinguish indolent from aggressive, prometastatic melanoma. Recent studies have shown that gene expression–based testing of patient‐derived melanoma tissue is feasible, and molecular tests may fully replace interventional surgical methods such as sentinel lymph node biopsies in the future. Because of their central role in mediating invasion and metastasis, integrins are likely to be useful biomarkers. Integrins are also attractive candidate targets for interventional therapy. This article focuses on the role of integrins in melanoma and highlights recent advances in the field of translational research.