Ray, Amrita

Background Odontogenic sinusitis (ODS) is a common cause of unilateral infectious maxillary sinusitis but is frequently underdiagnosed due to nonspecific symptoms, subtle dental findings on imaging, and limitations of traditional bacterial cultures—particularly for anaerobic organisms. Next-generation DNA sequencing (NGS) may enhance detection of odontogenic bacteria. Objective This study compared bacterial detection between standard cultures versus NGS in patients with confirmed ODS. Methods Twenty consecutive adults with confirmed ODS were enrolled. Maxillary sinus purulence was collected endoscopically and submitted for routine aerobic and anaerobic bacterial cultures and for NGS-based microbial profiling using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Detected organisms were categorized by aerotolerance and ODS relationship, and likely nasal colonizers were excluded from analyses. Alpha diversity, beta diversity, and compositional differences between methods were analyzed statistically. Results NGS detected significantly more bacterial species per specimen than culture (mean 4.9 vs 2.7; P = .0015). Compared to cultures, NGS identified more anaerobic bacteria (4.2 vs 0.9; P = .00004) and more ODS-related species (4.4 vs 1.0; P = .0001), while detection of aerobic species was similar between methods. Cultures also often yielded nonspeciated results, whereas NGS consistently revealed polymicrobial communities dominated by oral anaerobes. Microbial composition differed significantly between detection methods. Conclusion In confirmed ODS, NGS detected significantly more anaerobic and ODS-related species than culture from the same specimens. These findings suggest that culture alone may underestimate odontogenic contributions to purulent sinusitis. Future studies should explore he utility of NGS as an adjunctive tool to facilitate diagnosis and treatment in the setting of possible ODS.

ABSTRACTObjectiveIntrathecal fluorescein (IF) is effective for localizing nasal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks along the skull base during endoscopic exploration, with largest studies reporting sensitivities ranging from 66%–93%. Due to reports of intraoperative and postoperative neurologic complications such as seizures and paralysis, surgeons often dilute the fluorescein and inject it intrathecally slowly over a variable amount of time. However, no study has assessed whether rapid IF administration causes the aforementioned risks or whether it affects its accuracy in identifying CSF leaks intraoperatively.MethodsA prospective study was conducted from 2015 to 2024, where all patients undergoing endoscopic exploration and/or repair of CSF rhinorrhea had 0.1 mL of 10% fluorescein (10 mg) mixed with 3–5 mL of patients' CSF injected rapidly via the lumbar drain over a few seconds.ResultsOf the 82 included patients, the mean age was 53.8 ± 15.2 years, and 84% were female. Sixty‐nine patients underwent successful endoscopic CSF leak repairs, and 13 had negative endoscopic explorations. Rapid IF injection was 80% sensitive (20% false negative rate) and 100% specific for identifying CSF leaks, and it caused no seizures, paralysis, or other neurologic complications.ConclusionCompared to prior reports of slow low‐dose IF injection for CSF leak localization, rapid IF injection yielded similar efficacy (80% sensitivity) with no IF‐related complications. Rapid IF injection was safe and effective but should be corroborated by future studies.Level of Evidence4.