Schroeder, Darrell R.

Purpose: In this study, we compare the use of rescue antiemetics in transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) patients undergoing gender-affirming surgical procedures with cisgender patients undergoing matching procedures. Methods: TGD patients undergoing facial feminization, genitourinary, or chest procedures between 2018 and 2023 were matched to cisgender men and women controls (only women for chest/breast procedures) using age, smoking status, surgical duration, and year of surgery to compare the use of rescue antiemetics in the postanesthesia recovery room. Analyses were performed using generalized estimating equations with robust variance estimates to assess whether TGD patients’ risk for receiving rescue antiemetics differed from matched cisgender controls. Results: We identified 397 TGD patients assigned male at birth (AMAB) and 194 TGD patients assigned female at birth (AFAB) undergoing gender-affirming surgery. Regardless of gender identity, AFAB patients received more prophylactic antiemetics than AMAB patients. Both unadjusted and adjusted (for patient and procedural variables) analyses failed to find evidence that the need for rescue antiemetics differed between matched cisgender and TGD patients ( p > 0.41 for all unadjusted and p > 0.34 for all adjusted comparisons). Conclusion: When compared to matched cisgender controls, TGD patients undergoing gender-affirming procedures did not have a higher risk of needing postoperative rescue antiemetic therapy.

Objective: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a frequent adverse event after bariatric surgery and is associated with patient dissatisfaction and increased health care burden. Aggressive multimodal antiemetic prophylaxis and the use of propofol infusion during anesthesia are associated with the reduction of PONV. In this study, we examined the use of rescue antiemetics following bariatric surgery performed with 3 different anesthetic strategies designed to reduce PONV: (1) primary volatile (VOL) anesthetic and propofol (PROP) infusion (VOL+PROP), (2) volatile anesthetic with propofol and dexmedetomidine (DEX) infusions (VOL+PROP+DEX), or (3) opioid-sparing total intravenous anesthesia (PROP+DEX). Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we included patients undergoing bariatric surgery from 2018-2022 who received 1 of 3 anesthetics: (1) VOL+PROP, (2) VOL+PROP+DEX, or (3) opioid-sparing PROP+DEX without a VOL. Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis determined the association between the need for rescue-antiemetics in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and following PACU discharge. Results: Three hundred thirty-two patients received VOL+PROP, 354 VOL+PROP+DEX, and 166 PROP+DEX, and all received prophylactic antiemetics during surgery. After surgery, the PROP+DEX patients received fewer rescue antiemetics in the PACU compared with VOL+PROP (11% vs. 24%, P=0.002), and VOL+PROP+DEX fewer compared with VOL+PROP (16% vs. 24%, P=0.023). This differential antinausea effect was limited to PACU stay only. Rescue antiemetic use increased across all anesthetic management groups following PACU discharge until midnight on the day of surgery (ranging from 38% to 46% across groups, P=0.71) and through the first postoperative day (ranging from 47% to 57% across groups, P=0.20). Conclusions: The benefit associated with anesthetic strategies designed to reduce PONV was present but did not persist past PACU discharge. This finding suggests that aggressive perioperative multimodal antiemetic prophylaxis combined with anesthetic strategies designed to prevent PONV after bariatric surgery have only a short-lived effect, thus health care staff in hospital wards may expect to encounter high rates of PONV in these patients. There is a need for the development of novel antinausea treatments to reduce the rate of this frequent postoperative complication.