Laplante, Simon

This systematic review evaluates current computer vision models and their applications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Using PRISMA guidelines, we analyzed studies reporting on primary computer vision model applications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, from inception to March 2026. A total of 85 studies were included: workflow analysis (n = 26), anatomy recognition and segmentation (n = 14), safety assessment (n = 14), instrument detection (n = 12), tissue/image characterization (n = 7), event detection and scene understanding (n = 6), and surgical performance assessment (n = 6). The performance of the computer vision models in the studies was heterogeneous, with accuracy, F1-score, mean average precision, Dice coefficient, mean absolute error, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve being commonly reported. Despite strong model performances in several studies, implementation in the clinical setting remains a challenge. We highlight the need for standardized model performance reporting, broader external and multi-institutional validation of models, and coordinated frameworks for safe and effective implementation of computer vision models in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Background and Objectives: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is one of the most commonly performed metabolic and bariatric surgeries worldwide. Marginal ulcers (MU) are a common complication following RYGB, yet their pathophysiology and the contributing risk factors to their development are not fully understood. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study examined patients who underwent RYGB between January 2008 and December 2023, with 1 to 5 years of follow-up. Data collected included patient- and procedure-related risk factors, as well as postoperative MU events. Statistical analysis methods included the independent samples t-tests, multivariate regression, and Cox regression analyses. Results: Our final cohort included 2106 patients and was predominantly female (80.5%), with a mean age of 47.8 ± 12.1 years and body mass index (BMI) of 45.5 ± 7.5 kg/m2. MU occurred in 241 (11.4%) patients, with a mean time to occurrence of 4.5 ± 0.02 years. History of smoking (HR = 1.87, p < 0.001) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (HR = 2.36, p < 0.001) significantly increased hazard for MU, while proton pump inhibitor use (HR = 0.18, p < 0.001) was associated with reduced hazard. Aspirin exposure, regardless of dose and chronicity, did not impact MU. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the importance of preoperative assessment and counseling in patients planning to undergo RYGB. Patient-related factors should guide postoperative monitoring and prophylaxis of MU, as this remains a debated topic amongst experts.

Background: Reoperative metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), consisting of revision and conversion surgery, carries higher morbidity and mortality compared with primary procedures, yet robust long-term data are limited. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients 18 years of age or older who underwent first-time reoperative MBS between 2000 and 2024 at a single large quaternary referral center. Data were stored securely and analyzed in R (v4.4.2) using standard descriptive statistics and group tests ( t tests/Wilcoxon/Kruskal-Wallis; χ²/Fisher). Sparse late-complication data precluded pairwise tests. Results: Three hundred sixty patients, 86% female, mean age 50 years, underwent reoperative MBS. Conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (49%) was the most common surgery. The majority were performed for weight recidivism (37%). Length of stay, estimated blood loss, length of surgery, complication rates, readmission rates, and reintervention rates varied by type of reoperative MBS performed and indication. Most early complications were Clavien-Dindo 2, and most late complications were Clavien-Dindo 3b for all approaches. There was one procedure-related death in the study following an open conversion. Conclusion: In this 24-year single-center cohort, weight recidivism was the most frequent indication for reoperation and was associated with improved perioperative outcomes and durable long-term weight loss. As the landscape of bariatric surgery continues to evolve, we recommend early referral to centers with reoperative MBS expertise.

Metabolic and bariatric surgery has been well described in the existing literature to be an effective and safe modality for weight loss in patients with obesity. Recently, hypoabsorptive procedures such as one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS), and single-anastomosis duodenoileostomy with sleeve (SADI-S) have gained traction, particularly among patients with severe obesity. These procedures combine restrictive and hypoabsorptive mechanisms, resulting in significant and sustainable weight loss, especially in those with severe obesity and associated comorbidities. However, the risk of malnutrition and nutritional deficiency following these procedures has been a deterrent for surgeons in their adoption. This review evaluates the existing literature on the safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes of OAGB, BPD-DS, and SADI-S. While these hypoabsorptive procedures represent highly effective options for treating obesity, the associated nutritional complications necessitate the need for long-term follow-up and supplementation and highlight the need for careful patient selection.