Back to Authors

Emiloju, Oluwadunni

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6884-4010

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 5

Analysis of Tumor Microenvironmental Features Between Primary and Synchronous Liver Metastases From Patients With Colorectal Cancers Using a Deep Learning Algorithm
Emiloju, Oluwadunni E. , Foster, Nathan R. , Smoot, Rory L. , Graham, Rondell P. , Pai, Rish K. , Sinicrope, Frank A. , Emiloju, Oluwadunni , Ardestani, Bahar Saberzadeh, Smoot, Rory L , Graham, Rondell P , Pai, R K , Sinicrope, Frank A , Saberzadeh-Ardestani, Bahar

JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics | July 22, 2025 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: 9 | Pages: No page available

10.1200/cci-25-00004 Get It

PURPOSE The development of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) is associated with poor prognosis, and recent data suggest that metastasis to the liver is associated with resistance to immunotherapy. We characterized the microenvironment of primary colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) relative to their synchronous CRLMs using a validated segmentation algorithm (QuantCRC) that quantifies 15 distinct morphologic tumor features. MATERIALS AND METHODS Adult patients with CRC with synchronous CRLM (N = 57) at Mayo Clinic were identified from the electronic health record. Routine tumor hematoxylin and eosin sections were digitized and reviewed for quality control. QuantCRC (Aiforia, Inc) was applied to digitized images to extract 15 GI pathologist predefined morphological features. Tumor features were compared between paired primary tumors and their synchronous CRLMs using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test overall and within subgroups. Linear regression models were used to find predictors of the paired differences in the distinct tumor morphological features. RESULTS The study included 57 patients (median age 59 years [IQR, 50-73], 51% female) with CRC primary and synchronous CRLM, and among primaries, 37 (65%) were left-sided. QuantCRC identified six of 15 morphological features that differed significantly between primaries and their CRLMs. Compared with the primary, CRLM showed reduced stroma, more high-grade tumor and necrosis, higher tumor–stromal ratio (TSR; all P < .05), and a trend toward increased tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) density ( P = .052). Synchronous CRLM from patients with left-sided primary tumors had significantly higher TSR, percent high-grade, percent necrosis, and TIL density compared with the primary (all P values ≤0.04). Among right-sided primaries, CRLM had a significantly reduced percent mature stroma ( P = .0296) and a higher percent necrosis ( P = .0027). CONCLUSION Compared with the primary, synchronous CRLMs showed a higher TSR and increased high-grade tumor and necrosis, which are features of tumor aggressiveness and a metastatic phenotype.
Comparison of survival outcomes for patients with Lynch vs non‐Lynch syndrome and microsatellite unstable colorectal cancer treated with immunotherapy
Eslinger, Cody , Walden, Daniel , McGary, Alyssa , Emiloju, Oluwadunni , Ahn, Daniel H. , Sonbol, Mohamad Bassam , Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , Zhu, Mojun , Ahn, Daniel H , Emiloju, Oluwadunni E. , Sonbol, Mohamad B , Bekaii-Saab, Tanios S , Hubbard, Joleen M. , Wu, Christina

Cancer | February 11, 2025 | Volume: 131 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/cncr.35756 Get It

In a retrospective study of patients with Lynch syndrome vs non‐Lynch syndrome and microsatellite instability high colorectal cancer, there were no observed differences with immune checkpoint inhibitors toward progression‐free survival or overall survival. Univariate analysis of Stage IV patients showed BRAF V600E mutations were associated with decreased survival.
Tumor-Informed Circulating Tumor DNA for Minimal Residual Disease Detection in the Management of Colorectal Cancer
Emiloju, Oluwadunni E. , Tran, Nguyen H. , Jethwa, Krishan R. , Mahipal, Amit , Mitchell, Jessica L. , Thiels, Cornelius A. , Mathis, Kellie L. , McWilliams, Robert R. , Emiloju, Oluwadunni , Storandt, Michael, Tran, Nguyen , Jethwa, Krishan , Mahipal, Amit , Mitchell, Jessica , Thiels, Cornelius A , Mathis, Kellie, McWilliams, Robert R , Hubbard, Joleen , Sinicrope, Frank A , Shi, Qian , Jin, Zhaohui , Storandt, Michael H. , Zemla, Tyler , Hubbard, Joleen M. , Sinicrope, Frank A. , Shi, Qian , Jin, Zhaohui

JCO Precision Oncology | January 18, 2024 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: 8 | Pages: No page available

10.1200/po.23.00127 Get It

PURPOSE Recurrence after curative-intent treatment occurs in 20%-50% of patients with stage II-IV colorectal cancer (CRC), underscoring the need for early detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Here, we examined the pattern of use of a tumor-informed ctDNA assay in CRC MRD monitoring in routine clinical practice at Mayo Clinic, Rochester. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of health records of patients with CRC who had at least one tumor-informed ctDNA assay from May 2019 through July 1, 2022. Recurrence was defined as radiographic evidence of disease. Descriptive characteristics of the cohort, ctDNA results, and subsequent interventions were recorded. RESULTS Of the 120 patients included, the median age at diagnosis was 67 years, 46% were female, and 94% were White. At diagnosis, 10 patients had stage I, 23 stage II, 60 stage III, and 25 stage IV disease. Of 476 ctDNA assays performed, 70% were performed in patients who had recurrent disease most commonly to monitor the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions and 16% resulted in a change in clinical decision making. There were 110 recurrences identified in 62 patients, as some patients experienced more than one recurrence over time. Compared with serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels, ctDNA results correlated better with radiologic imaging. CONCLUSION Routine ctDNA monitoring for MRD detection has been adopted in clinical practice; however, 84% of ctDNA assays performed did not result in a change in clinical management. This suggests the need for further clinical research data to guide routine clinical use of ctDNA MRD testing in CRC.
Neoadjuvant Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Localized Deficient Mismatch Repair Colorectal Cancer
Emiloju, Oluwadunni E. , Emiloju, Oluwadunni , Sinicrope, Frank A.

JAMA Oncology | September 7, 2023 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1708

10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.3323 Get It

Importance Colorectal cancers (CRCs) with deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) account for 15% of all CRCs. Deficient MMR is a predictive biomarker associated with responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in solid tumors, including CRC. The remarkable effectiveness of ICIs in metastatic CRC has led to their evaluation in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment of localized disease. Observations Multiple prospective phase 2 studies in limited numbers of patients with localized dMMR CRC demonstrate high complete clinical and pathological response rates (60%-100%) to neoadjuvant ICIs, with low rates of grade 3 or higher ICI-related toxic effects. Given the median follow-up of 12 to 25 months in these studies, longer-term monitoring is needed to determine the durability of response and to ensure that oncologic outcomes are not compromised in patients undergoing nonoperative management. Neoadjuvant ICI therapy is especially attractive for patients with rectal cancer given the significant morbidity that accompanies pelvic irradiation and total mesorectal excision. Ongoing and planned prospective phase 2 trials will provide further data on important issues, including optimal neoadjuvant treatment duration, ICI monotherapy vs combination, and the need for adjuvant ICI therapy. Conclusions and Relevance While this review found that early results of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for localized dMMR CRC show high rates of major and complete pathological response, longer-term follow-up data are needed to ensure that oncologic outcomes are not compromised and are ideally improved. Neoadjuvant ICI therapy in localized dMMR CRC represents a potential paradigm shift with implications for organ preservation.
Synchronous Neoplasia Rates at Colonoscopic Diagnosis of Early-Onset vs Average-Onset Colorectal Cancer
Emiloju, Oluwadunni E. , Emiloju, Oluwadunni , Saberzadeh-Ardestani, Bahar , Sinicrope, Frank A.

JAMA Network Open | July 18, 2023 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 7 | Pages: e2324038

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.24038 Get It

ImportanceThe incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) (age, &amp;lt;50 years) continues to increase globally within high-income countries.ObjectiveTo examine and compare rates of synchronous neoplasia found in patients at colonoscopic diagnosis of early-onset CRC with rates found at diagnosis of average-onset CRC.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this multisite retrospective and cross-sectional study conducted at Mayo Clinic sites and in the Mayo Clinic Health System from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2022, 150 randomly selected patients with early-onset CRC were identified from the electronic health record and matched with 150 patients with average-onset CRC based on sex and colonoscopic indication. Patients with known hereditary syndromes, past history of CRC, or inflammatory bowel disease were excluded.Main Outcomes and MeasuresColonoscopic findings (polyp size, number, site) and related histopathologic findings (adenoma, advanced adenoma, sessile serrated polyp) were analyzed in association with cancer clinicopathologic features and molecular data (mismatch repair status, KRAS, and BRAFV600E).ResultsAmong 300 patients (156 men [52%]), the median age at diagnosis was 43 years (IQR, 39-47 years) for those with early-onset CRC and 67 years (IQR, 57-76) for those with average-onset CRC. Overall, 85% of patients were symptomatic at CRC diagnosis. Cancer stage, grade, molecular features, body mass index, and family history did not differ significantly between these groups. Among patients with colon cancer, the overall prevalence of synchronous neoplasia was similar, yet advanced adenomas were 3 times more frequent in those with early-onset vs average-onset cancers (31 of 75 [41%] vs 10 of 75 [13%]; P &amp;lt; .001). This difference was not associated with cancer stage or primary location. Among patients with rectal cancer, nonadvanced adenomas were less frequent among the early-onset group than the average-onset group (21 of 75 [28%] vs 36 of 75 [48%]), and although the prevalence of advanced adenomas was similar (11 of 75 [15%] vs 14 of 75 [19%]), they were more commonly located in the rectum (early onset, 5 of 11 [45%] vs average onset, 1 of 14 [7%]). Patients with early-onset cancer of the colon were significantly more likely than those with early-onset cancer of the rectum to have a synchronous advanced adenoma (31 of 75 [41%] vs 11 of 75 [15%]; P &amp;lt; .001).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cross-sectional study, synchronous advanced adenomas were more commonly found in patients with early-onset colon cancer compared with average-onset colon cancer, and they were distributed throughout the colon. In contrast, advanced adenomas were not increased in patients with rectal cancer and, when detected, were predominantly located in the rectum.