Bartho, Murray J.

Abstract Selective myectomy has gained popularity for treating facial synkinesis. We examined the combined effectiveness of depressor anguli oris (DAO), partial buccinator, and platysma myectomies. Retrospective case series. Pre- and postoperative botulinum toxin-A (BTX-A) treatments of selective myectomy patients were collected. Facial photographs were analyzed using Emotrics + . Facial Asymmetry Index (FAI) and electronic facial paralysis assessment (eFACE) scores were calculated. Twenty patients underwent myectomies. Improvements (mean ± standard error) were seen in several smile metrics, including FAI by 2.80 ± 0.68 mm, nasolabial fold angle by 4.78 ± 1.83 degrees, and smile angle by 4.43 ± 1.18 degrees (all p < 0.05). Postoperative FAI was 2.79 mm. Total BTX-A decreased by 10.85 ± 4.48 units (p = 0.03). eFACE revealed improved oral commissure movement and platysmal synkinesis (p < 0.05 for both). Combined myectomies of the DAO, partial buccinator, and platysma clinically and statistically improve smile in facial synkinesis.

AbstractObjectiveThe primary goal of this study was to measure health‐state utility values (HUVs) in patients with facial paralysis before and after treatment. A secondary objective was to compare these values with those of other chronic diseases and currently available treatments.Study DesignA retrospective chart review.SettingA tertiary medical center.MethodsAdults with flaccid and non‐flaccid facial paralysis were included. Baseline demographics, medical comorbidities, facial paralysis history, treatment details, and disease‐specific quality‐of‐life scores were collected. Utility values were derived using the Short‐Form 6D health index at baseline and after treatment.ResultsThe mean baseline Short‐Form 6D utility value for patients with facial paralysis (n = 134) was 0.73 (± 0.14) (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71‐0.75). Baseline utility values significantly correlated with disease‐specific quality of life as measured by the Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale (r = 0.400; P < .001), but not with Sunnybrook Facial Grading Scale or Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire scores. Post‐treatment utility values showed a mean improvement of 0.03 (95% CI: −0.01 to 0.08; P = .14) in the overall cohort. The flaccid group showed a greater average improvement compared to the non‐flaccid group (0.05 [± 0.17] vs 0.02 [± 0.17]; P = .62).ConclusionPatients with flaccid and non‐flaccid facial paralysis reported HUVs that were significantly lower than the US population norm. Treatment improved utility values in both groups. These findings provide initial data for future cost‐effectiveness analyses of surgical and non‐surgical treatment options for facial paralysis.