Man, Olivia

Abstract Background Leishmaniasis is a rare protozoan parasitic disease transmitted through the bite of infected Phlebotomus and Lutzomyia sandflies. Clinical presentation is variable due to numerous species and host immunity differences. We present our clinical experiences with CL to guide timely diagnosis and treatment in returning travelers. Methods We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of adult patients 18+ years old who were diagnosed with CL from 2005 and 2025. We describe the demographic, clinical, and diagnostic features of CL. Results Biopsy-confirmed CL was diagnosed in 20 returning travelers (Table 1) from various endemic regions, most commonly Costa Rica (Fig. 1). The median time from travel to symptom onset was 36.5 days (SD 102), with an additional 75.5 days (SD 87) prior to biopsy diagnosis. All patients were evaluated by dermatology and 70% were evaluated by infectious disease (n=14). On initial presentation, lesions were described as ulcerated (50%, n=10), nodular (30%, n=6), painful (20%, n=4), and necrotic (10%, n=2; Fig. 2). Most lesions were located on the upper extremity (55%, n=11), followed by the face (35%, n=7), lower extremity (30%, n=6), and trunk (15%, n=3). 15% of individuals (n=3) had constitutional symptoms. No patients had definitive mucosal involvement, however, 10% (n=2) endorsed lip edema. No patients had visceral involvement. Species level identification occurred in 14 cases (70%), of which the most common was L.V. panamensis (50%), L.L. mexicana (21%), L. V. guyanensis (14%), L. L. tropica (7%), and L. V. braziliensis (7%). Initial treatments included azoles, liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome), and miltefosine (each 20%); cryotherapy and parenteral pentamidine (each 10%); with compounded topical paromomycin added in 15% of cases. 35% of individuals (n=7) failed initial treatment and required additional treatment courses due to persistent lesions (57%) or relapse following initial resolution (14%). 10% (n=2) required a third treatment course due to persistent/recurrent lesions. Conclusion While CL in travelers has a variety of clinical manifestations, travel history, knowledge of key clinical features, and lesion patterns can aid in early diagnosis and treatment. CL is associated with early treatment failure rate for uncertain reasons. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Abstract Background We examined how the COVID-19 pandemic influenced influenza vaccination, healthcare engagement, and patient satisfaction. Methods We retrospectively analyzed influenza vaccination records and patient experience surveys of adult primary care patients in southeastern Minnesota during two 3-year phases: Prepandemic (1 January 2017–28 February 2020) and Pandemic-Plus (1 March 2020–31 December 2023). Vaccination status was defined as “always vaccinated” (AV), “never vaccinated” (NV), or “intermittently vaccinated” (IV) for seasonal influenza. Results During the Pandemic-Plus phase, 7.0% (n = 3556) of the Prepandemic AV and 48.7% (n = 16 710) of the Prepandemic IV patients never received another influenza vaccine. Compared to AV, IV and NV patients were more likely to reside in areas with greater socioeconomic deprivation (odds ratio [OR], 1.58 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.53–1.62] and 1.99 [1.94–2.05], respectively), have a high school education or less (2.86 [2.74–2.98] and 3.38 [3.23–3.53]), and report healthcare disengagement (1.59 [1.55–1.64] and 4.21 [4.09–4.33]). After adjusting for Area Deprivation Index and medical comorbidities, healthcare disengagement increased among the NV versus AV between phases (3.33 [3.24–3.41] and 4.23 [4.10–4.35]). In a subgroup analysis those with severe comorbidities were less likely AV (NV vs AV: 1.21 [1.14–1.27]) and more dissatisfied with care (NV vs AV: 1.25 [1.18–1.33]). Conclusions The COVID-19 pandemic altered vaccination behaviors and healthcare satisfaction, especially among those at high risk of developing influenza-related complications. Medical providers and public health officials should be aware of factors associated with vaccine refusal to better target interventions.

Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored challenges with patient adherence to medical directives, particularly vaccine acceptance. While sociodemographic factors have been linked to non-COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, the relationships between patient experience, the COVID-19 pandemic, and adherence to routine vaccinations are uncertain.Figure 1:Yearly influenza vaccine refusal, influenza vaccine administrations, and overall patient satisfaction since establishing care with a primary care provider from 2017-2023.Panel A (Influenza Refusals): the number of vaccine refusals among individuals who are Intermittently Vaccinated and Never Vaccinated for seasonal influenza since establishing care with a primary care provider over time.Panel B (Influenza Vaccinations): the number of vaccines administered over time since establishing care with a primary care provider among those who are Always Vaccinated and Intermittently Vaccinated for seasonal influenza.Panel C (Overall Satisfaction): the number of patients who indicated that they were maximally satisfied with their overall care following any interaction with the healthcare system over time. Methods We retrospectively analyzed influenza vaccination records of adult primary care patients in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Vaccination history was examined during two phases: Pre-Pandemic (1/1/2017—2/28/2020) and Pandemic-Plus (3/1/2020—12/31/2023). Vaccination status was defined as “always vaccinated” (AV), “never vaccinated” (NV), or “intermittently missed years of vaccinations” (IV) for seasonal influenza. Patient dissatisfaction was determined if patients negatively ranked their overall quality of care on standard patient experience surveys. We explored the relationship between influenza vaccination rates, healthcare engagement, and patient satisfaction.Figure 2:Multinomial logistic regression of patient satisfaction on vaccination status across the phases of the COVID-19 Pandemic, adjusted for engagement in the health care system, participation, and area of deprivation index (ADI) for patients that were (A) intermittently vaccinated compared to always vaccinated and (B) never vaccinated comparted to always vaccinated. The “Pre-pandemic phase” refers to influenza immunization data and patient satisfaction data prior to March 2020. The “Pandemic-plus phase” refers to immunization data and patient satisfaction data from March 2020 to January 2024. Low ADI ranking refers to areas with a low level of deprivation, whereas high ADI ranking refers to areas with a high level of deprivation. Individuals were considered low if they came from an area with a state ADI ranking from 1 to 5 and were considered high if they came from an area with a state ADI ranking from 6 to 10. Results From 1/1/2017 to 12/31/2023, 21% of individuals were AV (n=36,632), 52% were IV (n=90,776), and 27% were NV (n=46,418) for seasonal influenza. Post-pandemic onset, 7% (n=3,556) of the Pre-Pandemic AV and 32% (n=16,710) of the Pre-Pandemic IV never received another influenza vaccine. In the Pandemic-Plus phase, the IV and NV had a higher likelihood of disengagement with the healthcare system [odds ratio (OR) (95% CI): 1.59 (1.55, 1.64); 4.21 (4.09, 4.33)], residing in areas of greater deprivation [1.58 (1.53, 1.62); 1.99 (1.94, 2.05)], and self-identifying their race as Black [2.29 (2.09, 2.51); 3.29 (3.01, 3.60)] compared to the AV. After adjusting for healthcare engagement and area of deprivation, dissatisfaction OR increased from 1.03 (0.99,1.07) Pre-Pandemic to 1.07 (1.03,1.12) in the Pandemic-Plus phase among IV compared to AV. Similarly, the OR of dissatisfaction rose from 1.11 (1.05, 1.18) Pre-Pandemic to 1.16 (1.09, 1.24) in the Pandemic-Plus phase among those who were NV compared to those AV. Conclusion Higher healthcare dissatisfaction was observed among those inconsistently adherent to vaccination recommendations. Targeted efforts to enhance patient satisfaction may boost vaccination rates. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures