Rehman, Muhammad Aemaz Ur

ABSTRACT Background : Tirofiban is a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, an anti‐platelet drug that is used in ischemic stroke or acute coronary syndromes. The goal of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the drug in patients who have suffered an acute ischemic stroke. Methods : A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to December 2025 yielded randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing Tirofiban and conventional management in patients with acute ischemic stroke. We assessed the risk of bias using the revised Cochrane “Risk of bias” tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0). We analyzed the outcomes using RevMan 5.4, with risk ratio (RR) as the effect measure. Results : A total of 9 RCTs with 4210 patients were included in our meta‐analysis. According to our meta‐analysis, the tirofiban group was associated with a statistically significant increase in the patients showing functional independence at 90 days, measured by patients with Modified Rankin Score (mRS) of 0–2 (RR 1.13; CI = 1.06–1.20) and excellent outcome (mRS score 0–1) at 90 days (RR 1.17; CI = 1.05–1.29). We found no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding mortality (RR 0.94; CI = 0.63–1.40). The tirofiban group had an increased incidence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (RR 1.25; CI = 1.06–1.47) but had a similar incidence of symptomatic ICH as compared to the control group (RR 1.48; CI = 0.98–2.24). Conclusion : This meta‐analysis suggests that tirofiban may improve favorable functional outcomes (mRS 0–2) in acute ischemic stroke, although the certainty of evidence was moderate. While no significant increase in sICH was observed, some analyses showed a higher rate of overall intracranial hemorrhage. These findings should therefore be interpreted cautiously, and further high‐quality randomized trials are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of tirofiban before routine guideline use.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS) is associated with an increased risk of early recurrent ischemic stroke. We evaluated whether biomarkers of impaired distal perfusion—specifically, anterior circulation borderzone infarct, and hypoperfusion mismatch volume—were associated with recurrent ischemic stroke within 90 days. METHODS: The BIORISK ICAS (Biomarkers and Recurrence Risk in Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerosis) is a multicenter retrospective international study (35 sites) that included hospitalized patients with symptomatic ICAS (50%–99% luminal stenosis of the intracranial vertebral, basilar, distal internal carotid, or proximal middle cerebral artery) from January 2019 to June 2024. The primary outcome was recurrent ischemic stroke in the territory of the symptomatic artery within 90 days. In the primary analysis, the exposure was an acute anterior circulation borderzone infarct. In secondary analysis of the subset with presentation within 72 hours of last known normal and perfusion imaging completed, the exposure of interest was prespecified as hypoperfusion mismatch volume at T max (time to maximum) threshold of 6 seconds, dichotomized at the Youden index. We performed multivariable Cox regression to test associations between exposure variables and the outcome, adjusting for clinically relevant variables and those associated with the outcome ( P <0.1). RESULTS: Of 2050 patients with symptomatic ICAS, 1737 (84.7%) presented within 72 hours of symptom onset, among whom 509 (29.3%) underwent perfusion imaging. The primary analysis included 1891 patients; 174 (9.2%) patients had recurrent ischemic stroke in the symptomatic arterial territory. In adjusted Cox regression models, there was an association between anterior circulation borderzone infarct and recurrent ischemic stroke at 90 days (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.02–1.93]). In the perfusion imaging analysis, hypoperfusion mismatch of ≥10 mL was associated with recurrent ischemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.03–3.28]). CONCLUSIONS: Biomarkers of impaired distal perfusion, anterior circulation borderzone infarct, and hypoperfusion mismatch were associated with increased risk of recurrent ischemic stroke. These findings support the use of perfusion imaging in ICAS as well as future trials investigating early reperfusion in high-risk patients with ICAS.

Background Mechanical thrombectomy for ischemic stroke has traditionally been performed via transfemoral access (TFA). However, newer literature on the subject suggests that transradial access (TRA) may be equally efficacious. Methods Online databases (including PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and Cochrane) were queried from inception until May 2024. Abstracts and full texts were screened according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Risk of bias assessment was performed using standardized screening tools. All dichotomous outcomes were reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). RevMan was used to perform the statistical analysis. Results Thirteen observational studies and one randomized clinical trial (RCT) were included in this meta-analysis. The total sample size was 4973, 4074 patients (81.2%) were in the TFA group, and 899 (18.8%) were in the TRA group. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of successful recanalization (OR = 0.92; 95% CI 0.66–1.27; p = 0.60), first-pass recanalization (OR = 0.84; 95% CI 0.69–1.01, p = 0.06), access to reperfusion time (mean difference −2.99 min; 95% CI −8.33 to 2.44, p = 0.27), and favorable functional outcome. Mortality and rates of intracranial hemorrhage were comparable between the two groups, but access site complications were significantly lower in the TRA group (OR = 0.57; 95% CI 0.37–0.88; p = 0.01). Conclusion TRA for thrombectomy in large vessel ischemic strokes is comparable to TFA in terms of efficacy and has a lower incidence of access site complications. RCT data comparison of the two techniques is limited, underscoring the importance of conducting trials.

Introduction Mechanical thrombectomy for ischemic stroke has traditionally been performed via transfemoral access (TFA). However, newer literature on the subject suggests that trans‐radial access (TRA) may be equally efficacious. Materials and Methods Using relevant keywords, online databases (including Pubmed, Google Scholar, Embase, and Cochrane) were queried from inception until May 2024. Abstracts and full texts were screened according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analysis (PRISMA) guidelines to shortlist studies that met the inclusion criteria. Risk of bias assessment was performed according to the New Castle Ottawa Scale and Cochrane risk of bias tool 2.0. All dichotomous outcomes were reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). RevMan software was used to perform the statistical analysis. Results Thirteen observational studies and one randomized clinical trial were included in this meta‐analysis. The total sample size was 4973, of which 4074 patients (81.2%) were included in the TFA group and 899 (18.8%) were included in the TRA group. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of successful recanalization (OR=0.92; 95% CI 0.66‐1.27; p =0.60), first‐pass recanalization (OR=0.84; 95% CI 0.69‐1.01, p =0.06), access to reperfusion time (mean difference ‐2.99 minutes; 95% CI ‐8.33 to 2.44, p =0.27) and favorable functional outcome. Mortality and rates of intracranial hemorrhage were comparable between the two groups as well, but access site complications were significantly lower in the TRA group (OR=0.57; 95% CI 0.37‐0.88; p =0.01). Conclusion Trans‐radial access for thrombectomy in large vessel acute ischemic strokes is comparable to trans‐femoral access in terms of efficacy and has a lower incidence of access site complications. Randomized clinical trial data on head‐to‐head comparison of two techniques is limited, underscoring the importance of conducting pragmatic clinical trials.